For a start, reduced European confidence in the US leadership from 85% to 16% in just 3 years. Put forward the joke that is Brett Kavanaugh (and no, he wasn't the GOP choice, he was Trump's against the wishes of McConnell). Cut taxes to the very wealthy (never something Romney pushed in previous campaigns, and the corporate tax changes are actually not ridiculous).
The entire handling of the border.
I know he's spoken against Obamacare, but given how successful statewide system in MA was under him, I'm sure he wouldn't have been as against the concept.
Wouldn't have left the Paris accord.
Also wouldn't have weaponsied stupidity and grown the influence of Fox News.
I'm not saying he's a saint, but again, there are differing levels of evil within the GOP.
You think all of these things have significant long-term implications? In the case of Kavanaugh for example, it's obviously long-term and it's clear that was a Trump pick, but what impact do you think he'll have that you'd deem significant(ly negative)?
What would Romney have done with the border? None of the drama but harsh border control seems inevitable for the GOP.
Very generous about Obamacare given the countless things he's said about it since.
Not sure what evidence you have for the tax cuts. It's very counterintuitive so there must be something backing it up?
Fox news and European confidence are issues but long-term ones...in what sense?
His views on the environment are often ridiculous so what makes you in any way confident he'd have done anything to protect it, given the overall GOP narrative?
Don't you think there's other things he would've done that are more damaging to society too?
He's a ridiculous individual but he hasn't done half the things people predicted he would do to begin with, and almost all of the stuff he has done is staple GOP with some additional appeals to the GOP base.
For me the only thing unique about the Trump administration is disorganisation, egotism, corruption and a lack of diplomacy. They are all bad but seem like very short term things to me. Compare that to all the stuff predicted about him starting numerous wars abroad, causing a civil war, etc. and it seems clear people exaggerate Trump's influence because of the things he says rather than the things he does. The goalposts get shifted all the time to make the narrative plausible.
Someone more competent and more keen on implementing GOP ideas doesn't seem less dangerous to me. As long as people are able to stop Trump doing something truly irreconcilable purely because of some personal vendetta or emotional meltdown, which it seems they can so far, he might even be less dangerous long-term IMO.