"a real bomber wouldn't make his affiliations that obvious. #falseflag"
Or something like that.
True that. Extremist pricks should always be careful when they speak.They're blaming his exceedingly partisan rhetoric. And they're not wrong honestly. If you keep screaming half the country are the enemy of the people, some looney is bound to take action at some point.
Should be interesting...
Won't say the name CNN
Trying to be anti-racist. Failed.
What's he said about the shooting?
The feck is this about?
Random poor gay person found out he could make money by selling his soul to Fox News.The feck is this about?
Can he not for once just show a bit of class.
Global Atheism figures indicate that in 2020 less than 2% of humanity is atheist. So your statement is a bit of a stretch. Most of us don't know diddley diddley squad.
Vast swathe of China is atheist in name only, many practice folk religion and Buddhist derived religions. There is no concrete stats for number of atheist.Stats? I've seen figures as high as 1 in 5.
2% seems far too low. I'd say that Chinese atheists probably break that barrier.
Can he not for once just show a bit of class.
Can he not for once just show a bit of class.
You know he wants to. He'll slip at some point...I bet all my worldly possessions that he mentions Soros at some point.
Vast swathe of China is atheist in name only, many practice folk religion and Buddhist derived religions. There is no concrete stats for number of atheist.
I got my figures from wikipedia I have to admitStats? I've seen figures as high as 1 in 5.
2% seems far too low. I'd say that Chinese atheists probably break that barrier.
Speak louder against right-wing extremism, then.
I got my figures from wikipedia I have to admit
But in for instance Latin America or Asia a lot of people are religious arent they? I have the same echo chamber you do. Almost everyone I know is an atheist.
Probably his daughter, then.Based on his standard syntax, I am betting that he didnt write that tweet.
Indeed. Could be a base rate bias. The population of London and Auckland together is just a little over 0.1% of the world population. Even if your circle is 0.1% of the populations of London + Auckland, it is still a small base from which to estimate worldwide numbers.So 2% is wrong?
I may be living a weird life, but my world in London and Auckland involves around 70% aethiests.
I can't compute a number of 2% globally.
Maybe that's just an echo chamber in full effect.
There is quite literally 0% chance that he wrote that last tweet. I've never been more certain of anything in my entire life.