The Trump Presidency | Biden Inaugurated

Status
Not open for further replies.
IBM have never accepted its role in holocaust so obviously they would release that kind of statement.
 
WikiLeaks were trustworthy until a couple of months ago so nothing is certain anymore, but Anonymous have just said they will release the evidence they have. If and when they do that and if it is verified then I think they have to be taken seriously. Until then though it just looks like more BS and election insanity, but as I said, mad sub plots and confusion everywhere.
How a voting machine could be hacked if is not connected to the internet?
 
How a voting machine could be hacked if is not connected to the internet?
The same way a computer can be hacked . If you have physical access to the machine it can be done. They are not, after all, some servers locked away in vaults.For example you can:

1) Manually tamper with the device, for the whole duration of the process.
2) Attach a RF device to a USB or other port the device uses for external communication.
3) Compromise any firmware update images that the device is about to receive.
 
I think Americans have a better chance of hacking voting machines in the US than Russian agents with funny accents! How has paranoia made the impossible leap from cyberspace hanky panky to real world, hands on sabotage of voting machines on American soil?
 
I think Americans have a better chance of hacking voting machines in the US than Russian agents with funny accents! How has paranoia made the impossible leap from cyberspace hanky panky to real world, hands on sabotage of voting machines on American soil?
You seem to be confusing the terms a little bit. An agent is someone native to the country you want to acquire intelligence from. The guys with the presumed funny accents are case officers, the ones that handle the agents.
 
You seem to be confusing the terms a little bit. An agent is someone native to the country you want to acquire intelligence from. The guys with the presumed funny accents are case officers, the ones that handle the agents.

That wasn't how things were done in my time! The good old days.

I still have the first cyanide pill I was ever issued. I keep it in a box of smarties. It's the same shape as a smarty, so whenever life is a little dull I close my eyes and take a lucky dip. When you bite into that sweet and realize you're not going to die an agonizing death in the next thirty seconds it gives you quite a fillip!
 
How a voting machine could be hacked if is not connected to the internet?

As @firestarter said. You dont need to be online to be vulnerable to attack. Feck, we used to hack fruit machines back in the 80's and early 90's with magnets, cooking lighters or strimmer wire. If it's electronic it will have flaws 100%
 
So much evil coming out of greed for energy from deep beneath the ground. Great to see rapid advances being made re: solar energy.
 
Wow, I never thought I'd see the US have as many openly corrupt bandits running government as Pakistan does. Corrupt yes, but this brazen, no. What a state of events.
 
Harvard professor says there are 'grave concerns' about Donald Trump's mental stability
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...n-donald-trump-mental-stability-a7482586.html

Three leading professors of psychiatry have written to Barack Obama to express their “grave concern” over Donald Trump’s mental stability.

In the letter addressed to the US president, doctors from Harvard Medical School and the University of California have urged him to order a “full medical and neuropsychiatric evaluation” before the President-elect takes office in January.

The group said it could not speculate on a diagnosis, but Mr Trump’s “grandiosity, impulsivity, hypersensitivity to criticism” led them to believe he was unfit for office.

“Professional standards do not permit us to venture a diagnosis for a public figure whom we have not evaluated personally,” the letter signed by Judith Herman, Nanette Gartrell and Dee Mosbacher, and published by the Huffington Post, reads.

“Nevertheless, his widely reported symptoms of mental instability — including grandiosity, impulsivity, hypersensitivity to slights or criticism, and an apparent inability to distinguish between fantasy and reality — lead us to question his fitness for the immense responsibilities of the office.”
 
Harvard professor says there are 'grave concerns' about Donald Trump's mental stability
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...n-donald-trump-mental-stability-a7482586.html

People have been saying that for years, it's so obvious to anyone really. This is one of the things I have been saying is unbelievable for months and months. It's clear he is medically unfit for office, it's astonishing that he's been allowed to get this far with clear psychological and personallity problems. He's a sick man, in more ways than one, but because he's got money he's ok? It's pure insanity.
 
Harvard professor says there are 'grave concerns' about Donald Trump's mental stability


This is what the pointless Electorial College are meant to stop. It's obvious to anyone that he as issues. But the news media are trying their best to normalize him.
 
I'd like enough electors to not vote for him to make it embarrassing for him, without altering the result.
 
civil war or world war... tough decisions
The very fact that Trump and his associates would likely incite Americans to violent protest in the event of him failing to become President speaks of his unsuitability.
 
I'd like enough electors to not vote for him to make it embarrassing for him, without altering the result.

He's already delegitimized through the popular vote and Russian hacks, so rogue electors voting him would pretty much complete the narrative.
 
Last edited:
He's already delegitimized through the popular vote and Russian hacks, so rogue electors voting him would pretty much complete the narrative.

saw from some interviews last week, the Dems are distancing themselves from the call to flip the Electoral votes. At least those in congress.
This is wise. They are looking at long term.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
saw from some interviews last week, the Dems are distancing themselves from the call to flip the Electoral votes. At least those in congress.
This is wise. They are looking at long term.

Probably would make them look bad to be complaining about Russia subverting the process then to turn around and openly try to get electors to change who they vote for. Granted there is a difference between citizens of the US trying to urge people to vote one way and an outside government trying to influence that, but you know how certain people would view it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.