The Trump Presidency | Biden Inaugurated

Status
Not open for further replies.
No modifications till it comes down officially through SecDef....
It goes back to my point about this tweet...


He obviously didn't

SecDef gets asked about the tweet and basically responds with "I dunno, ask the White House"

Joint Chiefs respond with "We're not doing anything till it comes from the SecDef"
 
I didn't think the President could just change the rules on stuff like that? Isn't it a matter of the Uniform Code, which can only be changed by Congress?

Or am I completely wrong?
 
I didn't think the President could just change the rules on stuff like that? Isn't it a matter of the Uniform Code, which can only be changed by Congress?

Or am I completely wrong?
Technically, he's the Commander in Chief, so new enlistees don't really have much protection unless they successfully make a Constitutional challenge in court.

Those currently serving though... he's opening the US up to lawsuit.
http://www.newsweek.com/lgbt-advoca...nsgender-military-ban-and-well-see-you-642464

Those people have contracts with the military, they have retirement and medical benefits tied to those contracts that they'll only receive if they are given an honorable discharge.

Not to mention the fact that they'll need to be replaced... and the military is a hell of a lot more than just slugging a rifle through the mud. We're talking high ranking NCO's and Officers in intelligence services and the like.
 
Technically, he's the Commander in Chief, so new enlistees don't really have much protection unless they successfully make a Constitutional challenge in court.

Those currently serving though... he's opening the US up to lawsuit.
http://www.newsweek.com/lgbt-advoca...nsgender-military-ban-and-well-see-you-642464

Those people have contracts with the military, they have retirement and medical benefits tied to those contracts that they'll only receive if they are given an honorable discharge.

Not to mention the fact that they'll need to be replaced... and the military is a hell of a lot more than just slugging a rifle through the mud. We're talking high ranking NCO's and Officers in intelligence services and the like.
Thanks. Hopefully it won't come to court cases and he'll just back down quietly.
 
I can understand acceptance of transgender people in armed forces, but don't really get why the military should pay for the surgery itself?
First, that's not my point. Paying for surgeries is one of the justifications given for the ban. Secondly, if the issue was paying for surgeries, it would be much easier to just require that any gender reassignment surgeries be paid for privately rather than through Tri-care rather than to attempt to ban an entire class of people from serving their country. Finally, the reason why the surgeries are paid for by the government is because the soldiers are entitled to Tri-care services as part of their service to the nation in the armed forces.
 
First, that's not my point. Paying for surgeries is one of the justifications given for the ban. Secondly, if the issue was paying for surgeries, it would be much easier to just require that any gender reassignment surgeries be paid for privately rather than through Tri-care rather than to attempt to ban an entire class of people from serving their country. Finally, the reason why the surgeries are paid for by the government is because the soldiers are entitled to Tri-care services as part of their service to the nation in the armed forces.

Not a critical view, just a query. Your last line clarified it.
 
I can understand acceptance of transgender people in armed forces, but don't really get why the military should pay for the surgery itself?

To put in context, it allegedly costs $8m per year for this issue whereas POTUS has so far this year spent $60m on his personal trips.

This topic is about cost saving to save for his wall. He should look in a mirror



Love Trae Crowder
 
Last edited:
An authoritative 2016 study by the Rand Corporation suggests the concern is unfounded. The study estimated that transgender health care costs for the estimated 2,450 active duty

transgender troops would increase the health budget by $2.4m to $8.4m annually - just 0.04% to 0.13%.

By comparison, the Pentagon spends about $84m annually on erectile dysfunction medication, according to a Military Times analysis - 10 times the upper estimate for transgender related costs.

Gotta keep the GOP looneys happy
 


:lol: Yeah, good luck with getting rid of gangs. What a fool.



Me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me.... It's exhausting, his ego knows no bounds.
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/ryan-...house-leakers-reince-priebus-and-steve-bannon

Jesus Christ.

I would like to exit this simulation and come back to the real world where Hillary is president.

So...Mooch is blaming Priebus and Bannon, and presumably doesn't like either of them. Priebus and Bannon also don't like each other, while Bannon and Kushner have also got beef. Trump's aligned closely with Bannon, but Kushner's sleeping with someone Trump probably used to sleep with :nervous:, and so they're closely aligned. Then you've got Trump's entire party, who's he's kind of aligned with default but doesn't actually like. What a mess.:lol:
 
So...Mooch is blaming Priebus and Bannon, and presumably doesn't like either of them. Priebus and Bannon also don't like each other, while Bannon and Kushner have also got beef. Trump's aligned closely with Bannon, but Kushner's sleeping with someone Trump probably used to sleep with :nervous:, and so they're closely aligned. Then you've got Trump's entire party, who's he's kind of aligned with default but doesn't actually like. What a mess.:lol:

And all because a reporter reported on a dinner with Sean Hannity.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.