its always the cover up...
They will most likely succeed with the obstruction of justice charges.
They will most likely succeed with the obstruction of justice charges.
The Trump Presidency | Biden Inaugurated
- Thread starter Raoul
- Start date
- Status
Here's the kicker... in his interview with Chris Wallace, right after telling Wallace that Trump wasn't under investigation, he said that Trump is under investigation
Watch the video...
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/chris-wa...igation-inconsistencies-oh-boy-this-is-weird/
(And really, watch the whole thing... it gets pretty funny watching Trump's lawyer have a meltdown on Fox)
Last edited:
Sekulow is such a moron. Used to follow him for years when he represented Pat Robertson and the 700 Club. Not at all surprised he's with Drumpf now.He goes full meltdown mode on Chris Wallace. Contradicts himself 3 or 4 times
'I respect attorney-client privilege, unlike Comey...'
Comey wasn't Trump's attorney(?)
Thank you!
Is that the character that lionel hut was based on?
Any American lawyer worth their salt won't contradict facts on national tv, let alone the potus lawyer
Any American lawyer worth their salt won't contradict facts on national tv, let alone the potus lawyer
Yeah I wish Wallace had caught that one too. I was scratching my head for sure
talk about getting your knickers in a twist.
What's amazing is if you go on Twitter and search "Wallace Sekulow" you'll see scores of Trumpites saying Wallace "got schooled".
I'm not sure which was my favorite bit, either saying Trump wasn't under investigation, then a minute later twice saying he was under investigation, or talking about "Constitutional theory" and then trying to correct Wallace by saying it's not theory it's the Constitution, before having it pointed out that was his own phrase.
I posted on Facebook something making fun of Newt Gingrich for saying that a president can't obstruct justice when he included obstruction in his own House's impeachment of Bill Clinton.
My Trumpite uncle's response to it...
"The articles of impeachment against Clinton were in regards to SWORN TESTIMONY"
My response...
"And...? They included obstruction of justice. Plain as day. Newt's ignoring history he helped make."
My uncle...
"Trump hasn't given any sworn testimony though"
I don't think he gets that since the POTUS has been impeached before for obstruction, it's quite literally impossible that the POTUS can't obstruct.
My Trumpite uncle's response to it...
"The articles of impeachment against Clinton were in regards to SWORN TESTIMONY"
My response...
"And...? They included obstruction of justice. Plain as day. Newt's ignoring history he helped make."
My uncle...
"Trump hasn't given any sworn testimony though"
I don't think he gets that since the POTUS has been impeached before for obstruction, it's quite literally impossible that the POTUS can't obstruct.
Last edited:
Yup, because bullshit baffles their brains and also because they live in an alternate reality. They couldn't ever admit to being wrong. Also, Wallace just lets him talk, and later on, rant, so of course that's all they hear, because they aren't really listening.
All this will have to eventually go to the Supreme Court I suppose.
5-4
5-4
Or that he repeatedly stated his inability to read minds but later wants to show what Wallace is "trying to do here".
He somehow saved the story about the investigation. It's not directly contradictive if he was builduing his statement on a theoretical series of events which he tried to frame it as later on.
He could have presented his case easily better though. 1. Trump got no memo about being under investigation. 2. Trump's tweet is to be read as an answer to a possible series of events. 3. Trump has the right to fire Rosenstein under the constitution. No comment about any questions about what the feeling in Trump's team is about these events.
Another fine part of a brilliant 10 minutes.
That's always the scariest thing to me. Happens with every political interview, no matter how one sided it may seem. Makes you think they don't really matter.
2:40 in that video. I had to watch it twice He says more than once that Trump is being investigated, then says "I didn't say that". They should have shown a video of what he just said 
He says more than once that Trump is being investigated, then says "I didn't say that". They should have shown a video of what he just said Brilliant. Announces he's under investigation in the first two minutes, spends the next 5 explaining he isn't under investigation and talking about his theory on mind reading, and then spends the last 2 minutes explaining that expanding legal team is there purely in preparation for or response to an investigation.
2:40 in that video. I had to watch it twice
Unreal!
Jason Chaffetz: Trump is ‘almost worse’ than Obama — and Jeff Sessions is ‘worse’ than Loretta Lynch
“The reality is, sadly, I don’t see much difference between the Trump administration and the Obama administration,” Chaffetz told the conservative host. “I thought there would be this, these floodgates would open up with all the documents we wanted from the Department of State, the Department of Justice, the Pentagon.”
“In many ways, it’s almost worse because we’re getting nothing, and that’s terribly frustrating and, with all due respect, the attorney general has not changed at all,” he added. “I find him to be worse than what I saw with Loretta Lynch in terms of releasing documents and making things available. I just, that’s my experience, and that’s not what I expected.”
http://www.rawstory.com/2017/06/jas...nd-jeff-sessions-is-worse-than-loretta-lynch/
Rubio and Sanders.
An incredibly salient narrative runs throughout this video. Worth a watch.
Well, to twitter for me then.
If ever I wished some information was real, it's this. Just imagine the whole WH running around like headless Chickens while Trump shouts at the TV like a demented old man. Priceless.Maybe he thinks the people on the telly are talking to him.
Sadly I feel this might be close to the truth
Steve Bannon is Under Investigation for Obstruction & Physical Threats
http://www.inquisitr.com/4300817/st...-startling-allegations-claims-bannon-is-done/
http://www.inquisitr.com/4300817/st...-startling-allegations-claims-bannon-is-done/
That story's all hinging on Claude Taylor's source's credibility (and Claude's).
Would love for it to be true, but I'd play that cautiously.
Maybe he prefers the Gestapo rule.
Basically a real life Banana Splits episode.
- Status