acnumber9
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2006
- Messages
- 22,565
With such a great team and superior manager you'd wonder why Spurs aren't more than 3 points ahead of Utd.
Only 2 united players? I know you're biased but you can at least try to be a little objective. Unbeleivable that you pick Lloris ahead of De Gea. I'd have Valencia and Bailly in the defense but it's close between them and the spurs players so fair enough. Also you can't have Alli there ahead of Mkhitaryan, that's just stupid.
De Gea
Valencia - Alderweireld - Bailly - Shaw
Wanyama
Alli - Pogba
Eriksen - Zlatan - Mkhitaryan
That team would crush yours
With such a great team and superior manager you'd wonder why Spurs aren't more than 3 points ahead of Utd.
With such a great team and superior manager you'd wonder why Spurs aren't more than 3 points ahead of Utd.
Who has said that? I cant recall ever seeing somebody saying Poch is superior to Jose. I think both teams are fairly even in terms of ability and it comes down to opinion on individuals. No need to bring sarcasm into it.
I don't think you'd need to go far to find a Spurs fan on this site with that opinion. It's a flippant post but if you're saying Utd only have two players on their team that would get into Spurs team then it's going to provoke responses.Who has said that? I cant recall ever seeing somebody saying Poch is superior to Jose. I think both teams are fairly even in terms of ability and it comes down to opinion on individuals. No need to bring sarcasm into it.
I don't think you'd need to go far to find a Spurs fan on this site with that opinion. It's a flippant post but if you're saying Utd only have two players on their team that would get into Spurs team then it's going to provoke responses.
But you haven't applied that logic elsewhere. A big part of Pogba's form is the midfield around him. So why not pick United's midfield then? I'm also not sure that Eriksen is an automatic pick ahead of Mata or Mkhitaryan. Or Martial for that matter.Well its all opinion however to be fair to me I did say De Gea could easily be selected ahead of Lloris but my own preference was Hugo and I also said Valencia could easily have been my RB also which would have been 4 players from Utd which I think is a fair reflection imo. Spurs defence is better than Utd's, I dont think many could argue that so thats why I went Lloris because he is a big part of that. Take the defence out of it then you have to pick Zlatan, Alli, Eriksen and Pogba which only leaves 2 places left out of the 11 to be debated about I think.
But you haven't applied that logic elsewhere. A big part of Pogba's form is the midfield around him. So why not pick United's midfield then?
Jan Vertonghen? Really? You're arguing against your own logic. I think my initial point was fair. With such great players Spurs really should be in a better position.Indivdually and collectively I believe that our defense is superior to Utd - not by a huge amount but by enough for me to select them all (I could easily have De Gea in there instead of Hugo of course). This is not the case in midfield or attack obviously which is when I start selecting the likes of Pogba and Zlatan as they are shoe-in's
Jan Vertonghen? Really? You're arguing against your own logic. I think my initial point was fair. With such great players Spurs really should be in a better position.
I'd take any or our centre backs other than Rojo ahead of him. You think Spurs would have 9 of a combined team so I'm not surprised you'd think that. Out of interest if you were picking from the entire league who would you leave out of your defence?Who do you think Utd have that is better than Vertonghen? I honestly don't think you have anybody better.
I'd take any or our centre backs other than Rojo ahead of him. You think Spurs would have 9 of a combined team so I'm not surprised you'd think that. Out of interest if you were picking from the entire league who would you leave out of your defence?
But would you take any in the league ahead of him? It's a fairly biased opinion I would say.Well its all opinion of course but I wouldn't take any of your centre backs ahead of him.
But would you take any in the league ahead of him? It's a fairly biased opinion I would say.
It's a form of superstition that there's such a thing as a 'Spurs mentality'. There's absolutely no reason whatsoever for the current team to have some sort of mental bridge to the Spurs sides of yore, which would predetermine their failure. It's all very good banter, especially if it irks Glaston and the like, but I'm surprised to see that this spiel has caught on to such an extent now, that people affect to put it forward as a serious argument.
I think it's partly because some posters want to "rationalise" away and downplay the degree to which Spurs have developed a pretty good team. So last season our 3rd place finish was apparently because other teams had "under-performed" whilst Spurs had "over-performed". But now that - this season - that argument lacks even the semblance of credibility, we're apparently going to crash and burn because of weak mentality.
Personally I think the current Spurs team has a very strong mentality and tremendous team spirit. I'm not sure if it's still the case without checking, but I heard some commentator say recently that no team had come back from losing positions in league games as many times as Spurs this season.
They did under-perform absolutely. But I think the point is that we didn't do well because they under-performed, we did well because we did well.Those teams did underperform. Spurs have improved on what they were last year as well though, so credit to them.
I wonder if Pochettino will now start to play with 3 at the back as the norm, seeing as he's met with success (as far as I recall) each time he's used it so far this season?
The system would seem to suit us very well, since Dier is competent on the right, Alderweireld is excellent in the centre and Vertonghen is well suited to playing on the left, and also since both Walker and Rose have the pace and engine to get back and make it a 5 when needed.
Moreover, the system allows Rose and Walker to play an even more attacking game than they usually do, whilst Wanyama is quite disciplined in staying back most of the time, and so can provide a screen in front of the back 3 and drop back even deeper when/if needed.
The thing with Spurs is, I can't ever see them making a step as a proper big club. They'll always be Spurs in my eyes, in or around the top four, Arsenal lite kind of club. They're just a bit bland aren't they?
Seeing the build up to the Spurs match, they seem to be talking about their impending stadium move as if it's going to take them to the next level
Is it just me who thinks it's going to set them back a bit? We see with West Hams move that it's made more harm than good for the moment. And Arsenal had a few years of losing their best talents because of the costs of moving to Emirates
I feel it's poorly timed from them. They'll need to balance the books and they're going to be tested with offers for Alli and co at some stage. I can't see Poch being there much longer before he gets an offer elsewhere he has to consider too.
There is no comparison with West Ham. Their new stadium is a dog's breakfast - an Olympic's stadium that was never designed for football, and which they only rent. The Spurs stadium, in contrast, will be wholly owned by the club, is purpose designed for football and will be state-of-the-art. And we will complete the project with less of a debt burden than faced by Arsenal.
As for losing players - almost all of our key players have recently signed new contracts and are clearly happy to be at Spurs. The biggest danger is losing Pochettino ... but then he has spoken of establishing a dynasty at Spurs and is also clearly happy at the way his young squad continues to develop and improve. I'd be surprised of he leaves before we start playing in our new stadium the season after next.
See Bentaleb, Mason, Carroll, Livermore, etc.If/when Dembele's performances start to slide due to age (he turns 30 this summer) I think we already have his replacement in young Harry Winks, who has impressed in pretty much every start/appearance so far.
Pochettino appears to rate him highly:
"Today, he was fantastic. He is working very hard. I think he is a special player. It is only time before he achieves big things but, in that way, he can achieve big things quickly. He knows very well the key is to work hard and have a good mentality. Every day he is showing that."
So in the first season in our new stadium, the season after next, by which time Winks will be 22, I reckon he has a very good chance of being a starting XI regular for Spurs.
See Bentaleb, Mason, Carroll, Livermore, etc.
Haven't seen much of Winks. What kind of player is he? Anyone you would compare him too in playing style?If/when Dembele's performances start to slide due to age (he turns 30 this summer) I think we already have his replacement in young Harry Winks, who has impressed in pretty much every start/appearance so far.
Pochettino appears to rate him highly:
"Today, he was fantastic. He is working very hard. I think he is a special player. It is only time before he achieves big things but, in that way, he can achieve big things quickly. He knows very well the key is to work hard and have a good mentality. Every day he is showing that."
So in the first season in our new stadium, the season after next, by which time Winks will be 22, I reckon he has a very good chance of being a starting XI regular for Spurs.
I don't foresee us losing any major talents yet in the near future. Right now we're in a very good place, new contracts, good players, and a great manager.Seeing the build up to the Spurs match, they seem to be talking about their impending stadium move as if it's going to take them to the next level
Is it just me who thinks it's going to set them back a bit? We see with West Hams move that it's made more harm than good for the moment. And Arsenal had a few years of losing their best talents because of the costs of moving to Emirates
I feel it's poorly timed from them. They'll need to balance the books and they're going to be tested with offers for Alli and co at some stage. I can't see Poch being there much longer before he gets an offer elsewhere he has to consider too.
Haven't seen much of Winks. What kind of player is he? Anyone you would compare him too in playing style?
He has a bit of Carrick qualities to him: His best attributes are his passing and positioning. Though he's not an AM as he sits a little deeper and picks his passes very well. He's always open to receive the ball and he moves it along quickly and almost always forward.Haven't seen much of Winks. What kind of player is he? Anyone you would compare him too in playing style?
Sounds promising. Pochettino is building a proper squadHe's a CM with an all-round game both defensively and attacking-wise. He rarely gets caught in possession and has a 90.6% pass completion rate this season (521 minutes of football). He plays positively, always looking to move the ball forwards, is quite mobile, with a decent turn of pace and acceleration.
I'm not sure whose playing style I'd compare him to. Perhaps Modric a little bit, but obviously at a far lower level.
Thanks, thats a really good detailed post. He sounds like a really good talent and I hope he does well (if it means you kick Liverpool out of Europe )He has a bit of Carrick qualities to him: His best attributes are his passing and positioning. Though he's not an AM as he sits a little deeper and picks his passes very well. He's always open to receive the ball and he moves it along quickly and almost always forward.
One of the more impressive qualities I've liked about his is his composure and his ability as a "press breaker". In this modern game where pressing systems are so rampant players like Winks who are so composed on the ball and never seem to suffer when under pressure are very valuable. He's always moving to stay open, and his touches and passes allow him to move the ball around the press with ease it seems.
What I'd like to see is more of his defensive game. Often when he's played we've dominated or we're just closing a game out so I haven't seen if he can match the defensive work Dembele puts in. Especially if Winks is going to be the heir apparent to Dembele's spot, even though they play very different stylistically.
It might eventually, but don't most teams moving to a new stadium suffer an initial downturn in performances whilst everyone gets used to playing there?Seeing the build up to the Spurs match, they seem to be talking about their impending stadium move as if it's going to take them to the next level
It might eventually, but don't most teams moving to a new stadium suffer an initial downturn in performances whilst everyone gets used to playing there?
Next season could be very chaotic for them. Where are they playing home games?