balaks
Full Member
You just got fooled mister.
OMG well played. Fool me once, er.. dont get fooled again - a great man once said.
You just got fooled mister.
Spurs fans need to realise that to obtain strength in depth you don't sign squad players.
You bring in similar or superior quality to what you have.
"Building depth" gets you Sissoko and Janssen. They should be chasing potential upgrades. Not understudies. Tough on a budget. But clearly possible
We also bought Wanyama who has been an outstanding success. Every transfer is a gamble - Janssen hasnt worked out so far but it was a decent type of signing to make. Sissoko on the other hand... I'm still speechless.
Spurs fans need to realise that to obtain strength in depth you don't sign squad players.
You bring in similar or superior quality to what you have.
"Building depth" gets you Sissoko and Janssen. They should be chasing potential upgrades. Not understudies. Tough on a budget. But clearly possible
I agree with you about Sissoko, but I'm prepared to give Janssen another season because he's only 22 and this is his first season in the Prem.
But building in depth has also brought us Trippier and Davies - both definite understudies to Walker and Rose, yet both very decent fullbacks in their own right who have come in when needed and mostly done a good job for us.
Contrary to my own expressed views at the time, I was told on here last summer by many folk that Spurs needed to focus on improving their first XI, rather than on squad development and bringing through youngsters, or else we had little or no chance of top 4 against the big-spenders. Well, it's not going too badly for us so far.
Alli has improved further, as have Walker and Rose, and we have brought in from our academy another diamond-in-the-making (IMO) ... young Harry Winks.
Davies is bang average and a clear weakness when you have to rely on him. Agreed with the rest though.
He can do a job but yeah he isn't good enough really. I expect him to be replaced in the summer with a younger Rose type left-back - possibly that kid from Fulham.
Davies is bang average and a clear weakness when you have to rely on him. Agreed with the rest though.
Agree about both Davies and Sissoko, although last season Davies was a lot better imo, not sure what happened. Still a decent option to have since I doubt he's on a lot of money, and doesn't seem to be the type who complain about lack of gametime, but I won't be surprised if he is replaced by a younger understudy to Rose if we find one.
Regarding Sissoko, I'm not sure what the logic behind the signing was even, give us an option to play a more direct style with someone who can carry the ball? Doesn't seem to have worked out at all, and was a very un-spurs like signing. Still, we do need depth, so we needed someone.
Has Sissoko been that bad?
Spurs fans need to realise that to obtain strength in depth you don't sign squad players.
You bring in similar or superior quality to what you have.
"Building depth" gets you Sissoko and Janssen. They should be chasing potential upgrades. Not understudies. Tough on a budget. But clearly possible
Probably wanted extra muscle and went for two players in Wanyama and Sissoko hoping one would work out. The issue with Sissoko is that he has zero end product, gets into pretty decent positions but then does nothing with the ball. You'll still get decent money for him if you did sell him on though.
So in your eyes, what do you need to go to the next level? You are quite far off this years leaders. How do you take their place? I am thinking you are an Alexis Sanchez or Hazard away. These players are hard to get or create though as they cost a lot.I agree with you about Sissoko, but I'm prepared to give Janssen another season because he's only 22 and this is his first season in the Prem.
But building in depth has also brought us Trippier and Davies - both definite understudies to Walker and Rose, yet both very decent fullbacks in their own right who have come in when needed and mostly done a good job for us.
Contrary to my own expressed views at the time, I was told on here last summer by many folk that Spurs needed to focus on improving their first XI, rather than on squad development and bringing through youngsters, or else we had little or no chance of top 4 against the big-spenders. Well, it's not going too badly for us so far.
Alli has improved further, as have Walker and Rose, and we have brought in from our academy another diamond-in-the-making (IMO) ... young Harry Winks.
So in your eyes, what do you need to go to the next level? You are quite far off this years leaders. How do you take their place? I am thinking you are an Alexis Sanchez or Hazard away. These players are hard to get or create though as they cost a lot.
So in your eyes, what do you need to go to the next level? You are quite far off this years leaders. How do you take their place? I am thinking you are an Alexis Sanchez or Hazard away. These players are hard to get or create though as they cost a lot.
A better reserve left-back, possibly another midfielder with creativity and a fast attacking player. We can't afford to buy a proven world class player so we need to look at players with potential with the right attributes for what we need.
So I guess it is reasonable to assume that for the moment at least, you guys are happy with qualifying for the champions league, giving it a go when you do make it and aren't too bothered as to whether you make that next leap yet?With the stadium costs we just can't afford to buy established top players. This will remain the case for some years to come. So we have to rely on our academy continuing to produce the goods, on our scouting network to find another Alli or two and on Poch's coaching to further improve the players we already have.
Of course they'll be some money for new players, but not much in net terms: I'd be surprised if we spent more than 20m net this summer.
If we can upgrade on Davies as LB understudy, then fine, but for me it's not that big a priority. The main thing IMO is another striker, because if Kane gets injured we can't rely just on Janssen.
So I guess it is reasonable to assume that for the moment at least, you guys are happy with qualifying for the champions league, giving it a go when you do make it and aren't too bothered as to whether you make that next leap yet?
Don't they have an easy run in anyways? Or easiest of the top clubs, maybe? Doubt they'll struggle that much without Kane.
So what will MP do with Kane looking like he'll be out for a while?
Son as a striker or trust in the CF he brought in over the Summer (Janssen)? Gonna be really interesting to see how it plays out.
I think he'll go with Son tbh.
Son played in the victory vs Man City as striker and he tends to get quite a few goals against teams that aren't that strong so hopefully he'll be more than enough against Southampton, Watford, Bournemouth, Burnley and Swansea. Not saying they'll be easy games but probably not horrendous in terms of fixtures there. That takes us to about 5 weeks. 6 weeks also covers Leicester away, who we seem to be crap against. Longer than that and it will be a lot more difficult.
Its worth noting that at the beginning of the season, the team as a whole wasn't playing all that well so that probably contributed partly to how few goals we were scoring without Kane.
We'll have to see really. Its not ideal either way.
Son up front would do fine IMO.
One thing about Son, I think it's weird on how certain players can go from looking almost lower league quality in a match, then five minutes later hit the top corner from 25 yards.
Leicester away is semi-final weekend so we need to push for as late a rescheduling as possible.
One thing about Son, I think it's weird on how certain players can go from looking almost lower league quality in a match, then five minutes later hit the top corner from 25 yards.
I think he'll go with Son tbh.
Son played in the victory vs Man City as striker and he tends to get quite a few goals against teams that aren't that strong so hopefully he'll be more than enough against Southampton, Watford, Bournemouth, Burnley and Swansea. Not saying they'll be easy games but probably not horrendous in terms of fixtures there. That takes us to about 5 weeks. 6 weeks also covers Leicester away, who we seem to be crap against. Longer than that and it will be a lot more difficult.
Its worth noting that at the beginning of the season, the team as a whole wasn't playing all that well so that probably contributed partly to how few goals we were scoring without Kane.
We'll have to see really. Its not ideal either way.
When did Kane get injured?
Ah ok, cheers for the good response mate.
Personally, though I want Utd to finish above Spurs, I'd rather do it with Kane fit and playing. I don't like seeing a young in-form player hobble off injured (even with Liverpool and City).
Even though I know they get paid the Earth and are pampered beyond sense - I can't help feel but sad for them, reminds me of when I was younger and would injure myself and be out for a month or two (different sport than football), and you just feel so shit in that moment.
So even though I'm a firm believer in Spurs bottling it (as my posts in here will show), if their season capitulates without Kane, that to me wouldn't be them bottling it, and it'd be a shame (though I'd gladly replace them in the Top 4).
One point though, about Pochettino, is that Janssen is his man - brought in for 20m - if he doesn't play him now, you have to wonder what Levy will make of that when it comes time to sign future deals .
Making larger signings and then managing them is the one area of Pochettino's managerial ability that hasn't really been tested yet at this level, and if he's not gonna play Janssen, added to the flop of Sissoko, there's 50m spent that isn't being used. It's these type of things that can make a difference at the highest level.
What's this normally, 6-8 weeks?
What's this normally, 6-8 weeks?