Lothar Matthäus at his peak is arguably one of the hardest player of replicate because of the completeness of his game. Now, that term is thrown around quite flippantly these days, but Matthäus is the poster child for complete midfielders, and for good reason. And although there were a few other complete midfielders in the pool, from a skillset comparison standpoint, the more I rewatched Gündogan's games at Dortmund, the more similarities started to emerge. Just to break down Matthäus' skillset into three key segments:
Dribbling:
This is one thing that immediately stands out - his propensity to penetrate the heart of the opposition lines. Lothar was a class apart from a lot of other quality box-to-box midfielders because of that ability to drive relentlessly from the center of the park. Which is something that Ilkay is also very good at:
Dortmund's breakneck speed counter-attacks frequently called for him to carry the ball forward from deeper areas, be elusive, and provide 'rushes' in quick transitions.
Inventive passing:
For all the hustle and bustle, and buzzing around - Matthäus also had a remarkable eye for passes, which also elevated him over other box-to-box players that weren't as strong in this aspect, and not as technically refined. And over the last few years, Gündogan has emerged as one of the best deep/ central midfield passers in European football - and that element of expansive technical ability is what elevated him over someone like Arturo Vidal (another good consideration for the Matthäus role).
And from everywhere on the pitch:
Workrate:
Matthäus's ability to effect all phases of the game is well documented. And Gündogan is one of the best post-modern midfielders when it comes to buzzing all over the pitch in Klopp's infamous Gegenpress setup which called for him to be ultra-mobile in a young, energetic team. That element of dynamism and 'being at several places at once' is going to be key in the West Germany '90 setup.
And in terms of the defensive side of the game:
With the hardworking Ribéry and Turan in front of him, Gündogan will have relative freedom to improvise and become an all-encompassing figure, much like Matthäus had with Littbarski and Häßler. The one big differentiation between Gündogan and Matthäus is their contrasting ability to score goals, but in terms of what he brings to the overall team framework, Gündogan tallies up on most counts.
“Ilkay brings a great attitude,” said Klopp when Gundogan signed. “He has a great passing game, is a complete player, and fits perfectly into our footballing system.”