Deleted member 101472
Guest
Nah, the ring generalship was clearly with Canelo.
feck off adelaide
Nah, the ring generalship was clearly with Canelo.
Stats (scroll right)
Nah, the ring generalship was clearly with Canelo.
Canelos best was better than GGGs best for me. Better movement, defence, work to the body, creating angles and punch selection. I don't like GGGs straight line style and tonight he brought none of his usual tricks like switch hitting etc.
8 punches to the body over 12 rounds, that's got to be a record.
Except GGG threw more and landed more.Precisely and that how i saw it and it looks like the judges agree. The ability to take a punch is admirable but the fact that you are taking those punches still means you are being scored against. GGG has a habit of blocking punches with his face rather than his gloves which isn't gonna do you many favors in boxing in the long run.
Except GGG threw more and landed more.
Sounds like it.He's clearly wumming
GGG didn't have to do anything, he felt canelos power and just thought feck it, another fighter I can just walk through their punches.
GGG set lots of traps tonight with his footwork, canelo smart enough to not fall for them. Neither really dazzled technically to be honest, but canelo certainly didn't look like more of a boxer than GGG
I had no idea that in order to score points you had to land 'truly great' punches. GGG landed plenty of clean shots. He cut the ring off and backed Alvarez up against the ropes consistently.Golovkin outlanded Canelo, yes. But how many truly great scoring punches did Golovkin actually land on Canelo - most were slipped or partially blocked by his gloves. Canelo landed some extremely clean blows on Golovkin consistently through the bout, except for a small period during the middle rounds.
I think Canelo's strategy should be to wait til GGG gets closer to 40, which would guarantee success.
There won't be an immediate re-match. If that was the case they would have gave the win to Canelo. Golden Boy will drag out the re-match hoping that another 6 months to 1 year will see GGG slow down a bit more.
The judge who gave it 118 - 112 to Canelo should be struck off.
not the specialized media at least
http://mmadecisions.com/decision/8418/Gennady-Golovkin-vs-Saúl-Álvarez
Landing clean shots is pretty much the number one criteria when scoring a fight, and Canelo definitely had the edge there.I had no idea that in order to score points you had to land 'truly great' punches. GGG landed plenty of clean shots. He cut the ring off and backed Alvarez up against the ropes consistently.
'Ring generalship' now equates to being punched more?
feck off adelaide
Landing clean shots is pretty much the number one criteria when scoring a fight, and Canelo definitely had the edge there.
What I do give Golovkin tons of credit for is outworking the younger fighter.
Golovkin outlanded Canelo, yes. But how many truly great scoring punches did Golovkin actually land on Canelo - most were slipped or partially blocked by his gloves. Canelo landed some extremely clean blows on Golovkin consistently through the bout, except for a small period during the middle rounds.
No, he didn't. If you listened to the HBO commentary, though, I could see why you might think that. It was ridiculous.Landing clean shots is pretty much the number one criteria when scoring a fight, and Canelo definitely had the edge there.
Except GGG threw more and landed more.
He lost 8 rounds and was gifted a draw. GGG threw more, landed more and was the aggressor throughout.Landing at a higher PCT especially with power punches is key. Nobody is saying Canelo didn't get caught, but he manged those periods against GGG and controlled the fight better with the smarter more educated work coming from him.
Indeed. And GGG landed more scoring punches than Alvarez.Not at a higher PCT and not with power punches. What constitutes a scoring punch is key to this argument.
Really? Lampley and Lederman were both biased towards Golovkin, while Max and Roy were leaning towards Canelo. So on the whole, was fairly balanced.No, he didn't. If you listened to the HBO commentary, though, I could see why you might think that. It was ridiculous.
Really? Lampley and Lederman were both biased towards Golovkin, while Max and Roy were leaning towards Canelo. So on the whole, was fairly balanced.
He lost 8 rounds and was gifted a draw. GGG threw more, landed more and was the aggressor throughout.
Kellerman was over the top ridiculous in his Alvarez love. Lederman scored the fight like 90% of people.Really? Lampley and Lederman were both biased towards Golovkin, while Max and Roy were leaning towards Canelo. So on the whole, was fairly balanced.
He did, but during the fight, he said Golovkin would have given away the first 3 rounds in the eyes of many and that Canelo turned the screw in the last 3.Kellerman said GGG won the fight after.
Or maybe 90% of people scored the bout like Lederman...Kellerman was over the top ridiculous in his Alvarez love. Lederman scored the fight like 90% of people.
He did, but during the fight, he said Golovkin would have given away the first 3 rounds in the eyes of many and that Canelo turned the screw in the last 3.
Byrd had Canelo winning while she was eating her lunch.Pretty much everyone had GGG winning before anyone knew the punch stats....