After 10 rounds, they realise they're allowed to hit each other.
The RedCafe Boxing Thread
- Thread starter CLK_FPC
- Start date
First good round 
Much better!
Could the commentary be any more pro Quigg? A joke.
If Quigg wasn't so cautious, playing the percentages all the time, I could have been at home tucked up in bed by now.
I'm guessing draw.
Frampton by 2 for me.
Frampton has won cosily, 2-3 rounds. Jim Watt should be sectioned.
After all the needle before the fight, good to see the mutual respect shown at the end
Frampton came back into it towards the end, but Quigg still shaded it for me
Wrong!
Wrong!
really close imo
He's atrocious. Like a drunk in the corner of a pub with memory loss.
Frampton easily - Those tentative first rounds cost Quigg
Levi Martinez should never be allowed judge a fight again
Crowd were brilliant, Frampton deserved it but it was a shit fight tbf.
A draw was the right decision imo
I had Frampton by two. Quigg was too tentative in the early rounds. Not really up for a rematch TBH.
Frampton
That made Fury vs Wlad a GOAT
That made Fury vs Wlad a GOAT
Last edited:
Deserved for Frampton, but was a rubbish fight.
Quigg was so negative for the first 5-6 rounds. Maybe hoping for a late knockout to be fair.
Quigg was so negative for the first 5-6 rounds. Maybe hoping for a late knockout to be fair.
Agree with that card except Quigg won the fourth and one or two could have been 10 10
Thought the end made up for the terrible start, good fight
People again not understanding how to score a boxing match. Look up the rules FFS. If both fighters failing to engage then you can win the round by controlling the centre of the ring.
Had it 116-112 Frampton.
The judge that gave that fight to Quigg by 2 shows you how corrupt this sport is. He barely threw a punch in the first 7 rounds.
Matthew Macklin agrees FWIW.
He had a dodgy score in the Canelo/Lara fight as well.
Was it the English guy?
As I said, easy work for Frampton. Gave Quigg maybe 3 or 4 rounds.
Also, Sky's coverage was a joke, so biased towards Quigg
Also, Sky's coverage was a joke, so biased towards Quigg
That was a simple Frampton win -- no controversy whatsoever. In fact, the only controversial point was the judge who gave the nod to Quigg.
Had Frampton by 4 fwiw.
Had Frampton by 4 fwiw.
Really? The main commentator said all the way through he had Frampton ahead.
Ya but Jim Watts rantings drown him out. I find Skys boxing commentary borderline unbearable these days.
End of round highlights were clearly favoured towards Quigg.
Also, they usually show Jim Watt's scorecard at various points during the fight. Wonder why they didn't for this one.
Because Nick Halling announced that he had it 5-1 to Frampton after the 6th and Jim Watt said it was equal. Producer made the right call.
Actually the right call would have been to disconnect his mic, but still, close enough.
Shit fight though, let's be honest. No one wants a rematch of that atrocious crap.
Ah fair enough, I turned off after the decision. Anything to avoid Froch talking about himself.