Eh? They're issuing a new interim for what reason?
That bit makes no sense.
Eh? They're issuing a new interim for what reason?
Eh? They're issuing a new interim for what reason?
It's probably the right call to strip mcgregor of the belt at this stage
Fairly pointless making another interim belt
Aldo, UFC champ for the 2nd time without having to fight anyone
That's not too bad10:47 am
I think that's a harsh narrative, he beat Edgar to win the interim and the champ refused to defend his belt, and laughs off the idea of ever fighting him again whenever asked about it.Yeah that'll make for a great trivia question in a few years. Awarded the title twice, weird.
feck i jinxed it
It was the fw title not the lwGot to imagine McGregor is getting at least some of what he wants if he has given up the LW belt so easily
I honestly think McGregor would do it in the morningI really think a McGregor vs Mayweather fight would be a huge and low risk move for UFC and McGregor. First of all Mayweather is 40 so it is almost certain that he won't be at his peak. Despite this of course he would be a huge favourite and it is almost certain he would win. I would expect McGregor to put everything into the training camp however perhaps Mayweather would take his foot off the gas somewhat as maybe he wouldn't see Mayweather as a credible opponent.
Also Mayweather is not a heavy puncher so I'd imagine McGregor could survive perhaps four or five rounds which would be a decent return. Also you never know if McGregor can get into Mayweather's head and he also has that vicious left hand which gives him a "punchers chance". He could make a huge amount of money from the fight as well. If (when) he loses he can also challenge Mayweather to an MMA fight which he would decline and hence can play the morale victory card in the future.
With the featherweight title gone what are the chances of this?
Aldo in particular, funnily enough.That's not to say champions haven't gone a year or more without defending before, they have plenty of times.
It was the fw title not the lw
Although UFC have said McGregor has voluntarily given it up, there are also reports that is not true at all
I think there is a storm coming
Fwiw I think UFC have made the right call. That's not to say champions haven't gone a year or more without defending before, they have plenty of times. But I don't think anyone is capable of defending two belts on a regular basis
Difference is McGregor is healthy and fighting, just not in the division he's champion in. people excused the RDA fight and first Nate fight, that was fine but then to rematch nate instead of defend title was not right... well it was right in terms of money.Aldo in particular, funnily enough.
I think that's a harsh narrative, he beat Edgar to win the interim and the champ refused to defend his belt, and laughs off the idea of ever fighting him again whenever asked about it.
It's like saying Barao was awarded the BW title when Cruz was stripped.
He did win it in the ring... He beat Edgar.Eh? I'm not creating any narrative. Simply stating fact and that i find it weird that both times Aldo became champion he was awarded it and didn't win it in the ring.
I'm not saying i disagree with the decision, they had to do something with the FW belt as McGregor isn't fighting again for another 6-8 months and when he does it's unlikely to be at 145.
He did win it in the ring... He beat Edgar.
Would it have made you feel better if they'd have announced the Aldo Edgar fight as a "vacant title" fight instead of interim? Because that's what it was effectively.
I just disagree with the statement that he was "awarded" the title. If the fight with Edgar had been called the vacant title fight you'd say he won the belt. So if he's fighting Frankie on July 9th, if Mcgregor is stripped on the 8th, Aldo has legitimately won the title. If Conor is stripped after the fight, on the 10th, then Aldo hasn't won the title, he's been awarded it and didn't win it in the ring. It's reaching a bit for me.For some reason you seem to have gotten the idea i am criticizing the decision, which is odd as i specifically said i don't disagree with it. Its what i thought they would do, and the only sensible thing they could do given the situation with McGregor.
All i was doing was simply stating facts, Aldo was promoted to champion he didn't beat the current champion. So he didn't actually win it in the ring, he beat Edgar yes but he wasn't and has never been the 145 champ. And that was only for the interim belt. Again i'm simply stating facts but you seem to have taken issue with that.
Hope Whittaker gets a top opponent for his next fight, he deserves it and he's an easy fighter to root for. Seems like a nice guy and always seems to be involved in exciting fights. As Australia and New Zealand's top fighter he should be quite marketable for the UFC too.
In fact Weidman seems like a fight that makes sense for Whittaker. A serious step up in competition for him, but a huge scalp if he can pull it off and also a chance for Weidman to get back on track after losing his last two.
I just disagree with the statement that he was "awarded" the title. If the fight with Edgar had been called the vacant title fight you'd say he won the belt. So if he's fighting Frankie on July 9th, if Mcgregor is stripped on the 8th, Aldo has legitimately won the title. If Conor is stripped after the fight, on the 10th, then Aldo hasn't won the title, he's been awarded it and didn't win it in the ring. It's reaching a bit for me.
I'm assuming you agree that Barao never actually won the BW title either, rather awarded..
Yeah re the Aldo stuff I think it's a bit unfair to say he's been "awarded" a title both times.
The UFC FW title lineage starts in WEC. He beat Mike Brown for the title and then the UFC bought WEC and then the WEC Belt was basically no longer around. He didn't decide on that but he did win the title.
I think the more stupid decision is the one to have the Holloway vs. Pettis fight as an interim title fight. I'd guess it's just to increase PPV numbers by having a "Title" on the line.
I'm pointing out how ludicrous your logic is. If Conor is stripped 2 minutes before the Edgar fight, Aldo's earned the belt in the ring. If he's stripped 2 minutes after the Edgar fight, Aldo has been gifted the belt.Who's creating a narrative now mate?
The Aldo Edgar fight wasn't for a vacant title so stop pretending that it was, it was for the interim and only then because of unique circumstances. McGregor wasn't stripped before that fight he was the legitimate champ at the time. So Aldo won an interim title vs Edgar, in Aldo's opinion the interim title means nothing.
Aldo became the 145 champion because the UFC decided to make him the champ thats a fact, he didn't beat McGregor the current champ, and he didn't beat anyone for a vacant title in the ring. You can dislike the fact he was awarded the title all you want mate, and choose to imagine he became champ via alternative scenarios. But it's fact he was awarded the title, don't know why you are having a hard time accepting that.
It's no stain on Aldo's record to have been awarded the title he was the best FW for years, McGregor beat him but now has no interest in fighting him again any time soon. So the UFC had to do something with the division and i think most would agree that Aldo's the best candidate to make Champ and basically reset the division to how it was a year ago and move on from there without McGregor. Which is basically what they've done.
Yes he was also promoted to champion after winning an interim belt. Though interestingly in that situation Cruz was allowed to remain the champion for over 2 years without defending his title before being stripped. And Barao was defending the interim belt for 18 months before being promoted.
Seemed to me like you were almost taking a shot at Aldo for no apparent reason.
It's a bit of a silly argument to be perfectly honest. Whether you want to keep arguing that it's a fact or not banging on about "Aldo was awarded it and didn't win it in the ring" is a bit ridiculous.
Hope Whittaker gets a top opponent for his next fight, he deserves it and he's an easy fighter to root for. Seems like a nice guy and always seems to be involved in exciting fights. As Australia and New Zealand's top fighter he should be quite marketable for the UFC too.
In fact Weidman seems like a fight that makes sense for Whittaker. A serious step up in competition for him, but a huge scalp if he can pull it off and also a chance for Weidman to get back on track after losing his last two.
I'm pointing out how ludicrous your logic is. If Conor is stripped 2 minutes before the Edgar fight, Aldo's earned the belt in the ring. If he's stripped 2 minutes after the Edgar fight, Aldo has been gifted the belt.
The best candidate to make champ Yeah I think most would go along with that, with him holding the title and everything.