wr8_utd
Ripped :'(
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2008
- Messages
- 38,891
5/17 on BP. He's just been atrocious converting all tournament.Feck break point for Nadal on Thiem's second serve and straight into the net ffs
5/17 on BP. He's just been atrocious converting all tournament.Feck break point for Nadal on Thiem's second serve and straight into the net ffs
You were saying?Nadal is an absolute choker. HOW MANY BREAK POINTS DO YOU NEED BLOODY HELL.
USO had them for a while nowWait, they have started tie breaks in the fifth sets now?
Nadal has always enough left in the tank in a tournament. I so often thought he must be done after a previous 5-setter just to take the next one again in a draining 5-setter, rinse repeat.4.5 hours vs Khachanov, 3 hours vs Basil, 5 hours vs Thiem. Wonder what Nadal's got left in the tank for Del Po and potentially Djoko. Two of the Top 3 matches this tournament have featured Nadal.
Long way to go but if Nadal wins this tournament then I’d give him very good odds of catching or overhauling Federer. To equal Federer would only require him being the best player at the French twice more in his career. And if he’s still at that level I can’t see him not nicking another one or two elsewhere to go ahead.
Fitness permitting, obviously but at 32 he has plenty of time, in relative terms.
I don't think he will quite reach it, but outside of the slams, I'd like to see him win Miami, Paris and the World Tour Finals to complete that collection.Long way to go but if Nadal wins this tournament then I’d give him very good odds of catching or overhauling Federer. To equal Federer would only require him being the best player at the French twice more in his career. And if he’s still at that level I can’t see him not nicking another one or two elsewhere to go ahead.
Fitness permitting, obviously but at 32 he has plenty of time, in relative terms.
He's only a year younger than Nadal, think he could overtake Nadal, but another 7 slams (assuming he wins here) is a massive ask to have more than Federer assuming he doesn't win any more.And if Djokovic wins this tournament then he’s got a very good chance of oovertaking one or both of them.
I don't think he will quite reach it, but outside of the slams, I'd like to see him win Miami, Paris and the World Tour Finals to complete that collection.
Picking up an Australian Open would also make him the only player to have won each of the slams at least twice. Though for Novak it's the same, but with Roland Garros.
He's only a year younger than Nadal, think he could overtake Nadal, but another 7 slams (assuming he wins here) is a massive ask to have more than Federer assuming he doesn't win any more.
First set obviously skewing things but interesting nonetheless.
Nadal has always enough left in the tank in a tournament. I so often thought he must be done after a previous 5-setter just to take the next one again in a draining 5-setter, rinse repeat.
The good thing was that Del Po looked absolutely drained as well. If the match is the morning session, it could affect Del Po more than Rafa.I think the only things that work in favour of Nadal here is that Del Po's match against Isner was 3.5 hours during the day and correct me if I'm wrong but both SFs are on Friday, so he'll get two days rest.
Certainly won't be able to afford a long match against Del Potro as Djokovic will take him out again in the final.
He's always had enough in the tank at younger ages. At this point, he's had some pain in his knees, the heat and humidity and the long matches make it hard on him.
He's only a year younger than Nadal, think he could overtake Nadal, but another 7 slams (assuming he wins here) is a massive ask to have more than Federer assuming he doesn't win any more.
I dunno. At 31, winning 6 more grand slams is certainly doable, but I think it’d be a much bigger ask. I still have no idea whether winning slams at 36 or 37 is just an outlier or not. I suspect it is, or at least it can’t be assumed for all players. If, at 36 or 37, both Nadal and Djokovic are still at the sort of level Federer has been at the last couple of years, then I think both could overtake him. Over, say, the next 5 years, it wouldn’t be outlandish to suggest Djokovic to win 6 or 7 and/or Nadal to win 5 or 6, fitness permitting, as always. I suspect it won’t work out quite like that, though.And if Djokovic wins this tournament then he’s got a very good chance of oovertaking one or both of them.
If Nishikori makes the SFs then I struggle to see Novak losing that.We're all running on the assumption that Djoko makes the finals but he's not been very good himself and he's also got Cilic/Kei in the semis.
It's as easy as Nadal's draw last year except that his Del Po in the SF is harder than Cilic/Kei here. I am not very sure Djoko will beat Kei or Cilic. He'll definitely be favorite but he's not played well at all other than the Gasquet match.If Nishikori makes the SFs then I struggle to see Novak losing that.
Cillic will definitely be a good challenge, his first of the tournament. A lovely route to the final, so difficult to judge where he's at.
R1 - Fucsovics
R2 - Sandgren
R3 - Gasquet
R4 - Sousa
QF - Millman
SF - Cillic or Nishikori
He had a similar run in 2016 where he made the final under cooked (played 3 injured players though) but lost to Stan who hadn't exactly been blitzing through his draw.
Is this likely or another Zverev-esque prediction?Wow.....Naomi Osaka continues to steamroll the opposition. Future #1
Is this likely or another Zverev-esque prediction?
It is more likely than Zverev due to the volatile nature of the WTA.Is this likely or another Zverev-esque prediction?