In French, 'footballistiquement' is a word that's used, I guess Wenger just tried to use it in English without thinking.
Remember the last time Liverpool received £50 million for a player.
Anyway, if i was Liverpool i'd take the £40 million. They'd be able to get a good CB/good striker with that, and it would be better for the team overall. They'd be rid of a player who has honestly made the club be considered in much lower regard, plus it might be better in footballing terms for the long term as being wholly reliant on Suarez means they'll never be top 4, a bit like Spurs and Bale.
Its too big a risk selling him to Arsenal. They are the only team Liverpool can catch to get in the CL in the short term. If Wenger could actually get him to behave the gap between Liverpool and Arsenal would be too much.
Its too big a risk selling him to Arsenal. They are the only team Liverpool can catch to get in the CL in the short term. If Wenger could actually get him to behave the gap between Liverpool and Arsenal would be too much.
Remember the last time Liverpool received £50 million for a player.
Anyway, if i was Liverpool i'd take the £40 million. They'd be able to get a good CB/good striker with that, and it would be better for the team overall. They'd be rid of a player who has honestly made the club be considered in much lower regard, plus it might be better in footballing terms for the long term as being wholly reliant on Suarez means they'll never be top 4, a bit like Spurs and Bale.
Remember the last time Liverpool received £50 million for a player.
Anyway, if i was Liverpool i'd take the £40 million. They'd be able to get a good CB/good striker with that, and it would be better for the team overall. They'd be rid of a player who has honestly made the club be considered in much lower regard, plus it might be better in footballing terms for the long term as being wholly reliant on Suarez means they'll never be top 4, a bit like Spurs and Bale.
Well the last time, they got Andy Carroll so I hope history repeats itself for themRemember the last time Liverpool received £50 million for a player.
Anyway, if i was Liverpool i'd take the £40 million. They'd be able to get a good CB/good striker with that, and it would be better for the team overall. They'd be rid of a player who has honestly made the club be considered in much lower regard, plus it might be better in footballing terms for the long term as being wholly reliant on Suarez means they'll never be top 4, a bit like Spurs and Bale.
It will be Montecristo 520s.You're right that strategically it makes no sense for Liverpool to sell to Arsenal. I think that's what Liverpool's owner was getting at when he asked what Arsenal had been smoking.
It will be Montecristo 520s.
Who can Liverpool get who'd be good enough to replace Suarez' goals? What would be the lure of playing for Liverpool today? And if this is going to happen it would be in both teams' interest to have it done ASAP. Arsenal should look elsewhere rather soon if they want to avoid another hectic deadline day, no?
Why exactly does Suarez think the media will be nicer to him in London than it was in Liverpool?
Nah, it will be one of those poncy electronic cigarettes. Not the real deal anymore.
Wenger of course admitted to being a smoker when he was young. A cheeky jazz woodbine I'll wager.
Remember the last time Liverpool received £50 million for a player.
Anyway, if i was Liverpool i'd take the £40 million. They'd be able to get a good CB/good striker with that, and it would be better for the team overall. They'd be rid of a player who has honestly made the club be considered in much lower regard, plus it might be better in footballing terms for the long term as being wholly reliant on Suarez means they'll never be top 4, a bit like Spurs and Bale.
In recent years they haven't been great at selecting a good striker.
Don't be silly. Higuain was never worth that much money.