If it's the same pick - then yeah.I've left my picks though, should I get 30?
Yeah.If it's the same pick - then yeah.
I actually just woke up and posted it at the same time as (but right after) you so deleted it.I've left my picks though, should I get 30?
Yeah, that's why I asked.This system needs a lot of tweaking tbh. You left your pick with me "for the next 6-7 hours", the pick materialised almost 12 hours and about 1h30m late.
It can't be that leaving your pick serves as max 30mins insurance, yet if you do pick yourself before the 30mins you may argue it should be shorter
So once you leave a pick it's 30mins, no matter if you come back and post in 0mins, right?Yeah, that's why I asked.
I think we should clear it up with @2mufc0So once you leave a pick it's 30mins, no matter if you come back and post in 0mins, right?
nah I think we had that in the past. If you are online you can post it yourself and clock it compared to the last pick/tag.So once you leave a pick it's 30mins, no matter if you come back and post in 0mins, right?
But then leaving your pick acts as a 30mins insurance of sorts even if you end up taking 90. It's a bit like how when you overcharge clients complain but if you don't you aren't told.nah I think we had that in the past. If you are online you can post it yourself and clock it compared to the last pick/tag.
If you aren't then we have the default 30 mins rule.
TBH, I think the problem with him and others at Milan around that time is the same: " not van Basten" is how I felt about any of them at the time.Can't believe no one had picked Massaro earlier. Had Cantona-esque spell at the end of 1993/94 season for Milan.
"antohan, post: 22024177, member: 3500"] I actually just woke up and posted it at the same time as.
This system needs a lot of tweaking tbh. "For the next 6-7 hours", the pick materialized almost 12 hours and about 1h30m late.
30mins insurance, if you have to pick yourself before the 30mins you may be shorter.
Christ, that sounds like one of my puzzles, but you know what I mean I hope. [/ QUOTE]
But then leaving your pick acts as a 30mins insurance of sorts even if you end up taking 90. It's a bit like how when you overcharge clients complain but if you don't you aren't told.
But then, if it incentivises leaving picks I guess that's good for all.
What's important is being clear.
Everyone else makes 14 separate picks which all clock up time. You and Raees make 7 so need to clock double the time each time.Why an I getting 30x2 pick times? I usually post both at same time.
I didn't get 8hrs twice for earlier rounds!
Everyone else makes 14 separate picks which all clock up time. You and Raees make 7 so need to clock double the time each time.
Ok, whatever, their double picks get doubled, that's all.EAP makes 8 , Raees makes 7
By far my favorite tie breaker rule. The pace has been great.Ok, whatever, their double picks get doubled, that's all.
It's already relatively unfair on those in the middle to have to keep tabs more frequently as opposed to being at the end of the snake where you know it's coming back very soon.
Benefits far outstrip these caveats though.
By far my favorite tie breaker rule. The pace has been great.
By far my favorite tie breaker rule. The pace has been great.
Not really. The penalty of not picking within 8 hrs is also double for both ends than anyone in middle. If this rule is in place, I'd expect 16hrs time frame to avoid suffering a double penalty in case I get delayed it was sleeping during my pick times.And no, it has nothing to do with the 8 hour thing because the 8 hour limit is about everyone's responsibility to pick within an agreeable timeframe, while this is about ranking for a tie-break rule.
Technically you do have 16hrs for your 2 picks.Not really. The penalty of not picking within 8 hrs is also double for both ends than anyone in middle. If this rule is in place, I'd expect 16hrs time frame to avoid suffering a double penalty in case I get delayed it was sleeping during my pick times.
For all intents and purposes,the ends pick 2 players in 1 pick. You just can't change a rule for tie breakers.
That Guivarch-esque display in the 1994 final is probably seared in folks' brains. Love the Grun pick though, he could have gone earlier IMO.Can't believe no one had picked Massaro earlier. Had Cantona-esque spell at the end of 1993/94 season for Milan.
fair enough.That Guivarch-esque display in the 1994 final is probably seared in folks' brains. Love the Grun pick though, he could have gone earlier IMO.
Not really. The penalty of not picking within 8 hrs is also double for both ends than anyone in middle. If this rule is in place, I'd expect 16hrs time frame to avoid suffering a double penalty in case I get delayed it was sleeping during my pick times.
For all intents and purposes,the ends pick 2 players in 1 pick. You just can't change a rule for tie breakers.
Or check up the thread when his turn is about to come.All you have to do is leave your picks. Simples.