Kidders
Full Member
United should really sign this fella if he is available, especially at the price being quoted, unfortunately I suspect as soon as we show any interest in price will rise.
Yeah, it is like groundhog dayI feel like this is the 10th time L'equipe have said this.
That's correctAm I right in thinking that L'Equipe are pushing the Spurs angle, and Paris United are pushing the United angle?
Oops!!Wrong thread?
Obviously if we want him we have nothing to fear from Spurs. But frankly the sources linking him with us aren't what I'd call credible.
That's what was said when chasing after Bale at S'hampton.
Aurier isn't 16 years old and trying to be a professional footballer in the PL though.
Actually Bale was nearly 18 at the time. But if you don't like that example, try Paul Gascoigne instead.
or he'd behave like 99.9999% of adults and prefer to be paid more.I prefer Paul Gascoigne.
But in general the idea that a club has nothing to worry about an other one is in my opinion poor, because the context will have a big influence, a player might prefer a City or he could be seduced by the manager during a meeting.
Actually Bale was nearly 18 at the time. But if you don't like that example, try Paul Gascoigne instead.
or he'd behave like 99.9999% of adults and prefer to be paid more.
If United aren't willing to pay him Spurs, clearly Jose doesn't rate him very highly, no loss.And that's where we need to be careful because we don't really know how much United are willing to pay for a player, we don't know the status of the player either.
Doesn't matter if he does rate him or not. He actually may rate him very high, but after his interview about carefully choosing players and making sure they have the right attitude to fit in with the current dressing room makes sense if we don't go for this guy.If United aren't willing to pay him Spurs, clearly Jose doesn't rate him very highly, no loss.
If United aren't willing to pay him Spurs, clearly Jose doesn't rate him very highly, no loss.
That's what was said when chasing after Bale at S'hampton.
Excellent, choose a player who has openly admitted his biggest regret was joining Spurs over United. Suppose Spurs could do that to a player though...Actually Bale was nearly 18 at the time. But if you don't like that example, try Paul Gascoigne instead.
Strange if Spurs sign him after all these talks about trusting Trippier to fill this position and extending his contract.
Well, I trust Jose to handle the player should he sign him.Doesn't matter if he does rate him or not. He actually may rate him very high, but after his interview about carefully choosing players and making sure they have the right attitude to fit in with the current dressing room makes sense if we don't go for this guy.
That's very true, but it's not like we're bidding blind, I'm sure his agent will be like "Spurs are offering xxx per week, can you better them?" and if Jose decides he's worth it, we will.Not necessarily, we already have a starting right back which means that Aurier status in the team would most likely be different from United's POV than it would from Spurs's POV, generally the wage offered match the role of the player within the team, you can rate a player but have a lesser need for him.
Excellent, choose a player who has openly admitted his biggest regret was joining Spurs over United. Suppose Spurs could do that to a player though...
But yeah, if you still wanna bang that drum it was for football reasons he chose you
Paul Gasciogne reveals he snubbed Manchester United for Tottenham because Spurs gave him a house and his sister a sunbed
Agree. I'd say it would be about 90% in our favour though, but yeah the odd one would choose you over us.You can rationalise away as much as you like, but the simple (and proven) fact is that just because United want a player that Spurs also want doesn't necessarily mean that Spurs won't end up getting that player ahead of United.
No thanks we did alright without both while you lot won......um.
If United aren't willing to pay him Spurs, clearly Jose doesn't rate him very highly, no loss.
Obviously if Spurs sign this will be your reasoning. He preferred Spurs all along.Classic. If he signs for Spurs, it means United didn't want him very much (if at all).
No doubt if he signs for United then this will be acclaimed the inevitable result of United's pulling power compared to Spurs:
The process: a flexible interpretation that will swing with the wind to ensure a claimed "win-win" for United, regardless of the outcome.
Obviously if Spurs sign this will be your reasoning. He preferred Spurs all along.
I agree with your point, as each player will have a different set of values, objectives or preferences.You can rationalise away as much as you like, but the simple (and proven) fact is that just because United want a player that Spurs also want doesn't necessarily mean that Spurs won't end up getting that player ahead of United.
No, it's nothing to do with pulling power, just spending power. No one can argue we CAN offer much higher wages than you can.Classic. If he signs for Spurs, it means United didn't want him very much (if at all).
No doubt if he signs for United then this will be acclaimed the inevitable result of United's pulling power compared to Spurs:
The process: a flexible interpretation that will swing with the wind to ensure a claimed "win-win" for United, regardless of the outcome.
That's what was said when chasing after Bale at S'hampton.
Actually Bale was nearly 18 at the time. But if you don't like that example, try Paul Gascoigne instead.