lsd
The Oracle
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2016
- Messages
- 11,211
28 next season we need to cash in as soon as possible. He is not going to be what we need and the difference between having to play him instead of Casemiro is shocking
All were better because we were winning.
Take away the trophies and it would have been a different story.
Yes. You're going to say they helped us win but it was the core if the team that won the trophies, with the help of the fringe players. The same can't be said for today's starting 11.
Again. McTominay wasnt tje worst player in the pitch tonight. Not by a longshot.
Nothing like revisionism and hindsight.No they were better players, it’s laughable to compare him to Butt or Fletcher as a midfielder. Johnsen was a much better player whose career was blighted by injury. Park was an excellent team player who ran himself into the ground (not a ball watcher like Mctominay) and O’Shea was very versatile and dependable.
Mctominay has no right to be mentioned alongside those players. Cleverley, Gibson are his peers.
Funny thing is. I remember the exact same thing being said about the players mentionedMcTomminay wouldnt get anywhere near the teams they played in
Hes been a midfielder his whole fecking life, how earlier could you get?The point is simply that McTominay was given time to develop as he became a midfielder so late, and he is an academy product.
He has not developped. He wasn't good enough 4 seasons ago with the Jose pity trophy and he's not good enough. Not his fault really, but United need to move on, and fast.
Hes been a midfielder his whole fecking life, how earlier could you get?
YepNot really, was a striker in the academy IIRC
No they were better players, it’s laughable to compare him to Butt or Fletcher as a midfielder. Johnsen was a much better player whose career was blighted by injury. Park was an excellent team player who ran himself into the ground (not a ball watcher like Mctominay) and O’Shea was very versatile and dependable.
Mctominay has no right to be mentioned alongside those players. Cleverley, Gibson are his peers.
If we were a league-winning team, McTominay likely would not be a part of it.Nothing like revisionism and hindsight.
If we were winning leagues and trophies then the same would be said about McTominay
Fletcher and Park were much better players than McTominay. I don't really remember the performances from Butt and Johnson. I did have a problem with O'Shea. I thought he was a pretty average/poor player. Similar to McTominay.I'd guarantee the large majority of poster on here would have had an issue with players like Fletcher, Park, O'Shea, Butt and Johnson
You need a squad of players. You need a different mix of players but more importantly you need players who are willing to remain a fringe player and step in when needed.
I'd guarantee the large majority of poster on here would have had an issue with players like Fletcher, Park, O'Shea, Butt and Johnson
You need a squad of players. You need a different mix of players but more importantly you need players who are willing to remain a fringe player and step in when needed.
Nothing like revisionism and hindsight.
If we were winning leagues and trophies then the same would be said about McTominay
This guy needs to go or be transitioned to cb. He’s simply not skilled enough to play midfield for Manchester United.
Yes really, you remember incorrectly. He played about half a season for the u21s as a striker because they didn't have any. His first appearance as a striker came in a match alongside 8 defenders and a defensive midfielder. They had no striker in the squad so cycled through McTominay, Willock, and others in the striker role. His u21s debut was in midfield. His u19s debut was in midfield.Not really, was a striker in the academy IIRC
For being so far up his ass you'd think you'd at least know a little about him.
They were better players who played a key role in better teams. They were intelligent, technically sound and worked their arses off, they could play in a number of positons. They didn't hide from the ball and didn't tackle with their hands first. Which is why they were kept as utility players.
McT has no redeeming features, even as a fringe player. Is there one aspect of his game that he's consistently shown to be useful?
He plays CB for Scotland NT. And as above poster mentioned, he played as CF in youth teamHes been a midfielder his whole fecking life, how earlier could you get?
And as I mentioned with countless links of proof just two posts above this, no he didn't.He plays CB for Scotland NT. And as above poster mentioned, he played as CF in youth team
It would make a difference because we have absolutely no mf if we sell him and case gets injured. That's how thin our squad is right now. I am surprised we are not selling elanga and trying to buy a midfield cover.Just let Newcastle have him in January, cash in while we have the chance. I don't think it would make big difference anyway.