Sparky Rhiwabon
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2013
- Messages
- 16,945
I see that the UK now has had the most deaths in Europe now. Time for Boris and Hancock to resign over their handling of this?
I know the right wing press has been churning out their jingoistic shit about Britain leading the global fight against coronavirus but are people actually swallowing this?
Today in The Sun they have a piece saying Heathrow is to trial thermal camera imaging in the fight against corona with this quote.
WTf? Singapore had this at least in mid-February, yet we're talking about Britain pioneering some amazing new technology
These really are excellent points
Slightly ashamed but I just totally verbatim stole this and mentioned it during a Microsoft Teams MDT meeting I'm having right now in response to our line manager who's anti-lockdown. Hoping they don't test my VPN to see that I get all my original COVID-19 ideas from a man utd fan online forum
These really are excellent points
Slightly ashamed but I just totally verbatim stole this and mentioned it during a Microsoft Teams MDT meeting I'm having right now in response to our line manager who's anti-lockdown. Hoping they don't test my VPN to see that I get all my original COVID-19 ideas from a man utd fan online forum
Is that a smart way of doing things? I read somewhere that the tests could work if there were 3000 copies/mL .. any lower and it would register a negative..An interesting story from the BBC on "pool testing" of samples for coronavirus in Ghana. Basically taking samples from a group of (ten for example) people and testing them all simultaneously. Then, if you get a positive result, you test the ten samples individually.
Obviously the advantages of such an approach would only be felt if coronavirus is a rarity in the group you're testing.
It did make me start thinking about testing entire football squads, or classes of kids, or families, or even carehomes every couple of days. Though, I must admit I was surprised that the approach might work at all in lab terms - it does say Germany and India have tried it as well, so hopefully there's good news on that front.
The BBC story:
Ghana has adopted "pool testing" of samples to maximise the use of coronavirus test kits that are in short supply globally.
It involves testing up to 10 samples in a single test. If any of the samples tests positive, then the entire batch is tested individually to identify the infected sample.
Scientists believe that the method is a valuable time saver in the fight against Covid-19 and has seen Ghana test more than 100,000 samples so far.
But it is only efficient while Ghana's infection rates remain low and the accuracy of the method has been disputed in some quarters.
"The limitations come in when the majority of the wells test positive in which case you have to rerun the majority of the pooled samples again and you lose the benefit of the efficiency of doing them concurrently," says Nana Kofi Quakyi, a research fellow at New York University’s School of Public Health.
Germany and India have adopted similar methods in testing for the virus - allowing them to expand their screening capacity and improve detection in communities.
Ghana's medical drones have being deployed to deliver Covid-19 samples directly to laboratories, the first country to do so in the world.
This enables authorities to identify and isolate infected persons quickly and contain the spread of the virus.
If this isn't worthy of some kind of tagline, I don't know what is.
Fair enough which is why I said so, but you don't think my opinions hold any merit at all? The fact of the matter is, there are countries where a lockdown hadn't been imposed and are doing well due to a solid testing, tracing and isolating regime, although admittedly this is easier said than done.
I see that the UK now has had the most deaths in Europe now. Time for Boris and Hancock to resign over their handling of this?
Im on an NFL forum as well and have just seen a guy post this about the wearing of masks in public:
"It’s just a symbol of oppression. Showing that gov is controlling you"
Definitely, that's a bigger rate limiting step than the swabs which will have to be overcome if this antibody test comes through. From the phleb clinics I've seen in most GP practices and in hospital outpatients or cancer units they can do blood sampling remarkable quickly and see a lot of patients but its trickier I think with PPE etc.
Most importantly I've lost a lot of trust in government to sort out healthcare problems that require heavy-duty or mass scale logistics. Will be more than happy to be proven wrong on this.
I don't understand why they even use this Trumpian tactic. Do they think it really matters to those who are suffering, have suffered, or might potentially suffer, if Britain is the best or worst on the planet? Who, exactly, are the government trying to impress and to what purpose?They are still trying to convince the public that they are world leaders in the fight against the Corona Virus.
I see that the UK now has had the most deaths in Europe now. Time for Boris and Hancock to resign over their handling of this?
My mum has severe mental health issues and I'm not even allowed to see her to check she is ok.
there is a govt backed consortium who are making a finger prick home based antibody test. Should hopefully be ready end of may.
Google odx they are the company who will be making them.
I don't understand why they even use this Trumpian tactic. Do they think it really matters to those who are suffering, have suffered, or might potentially suffer, if Britain is the best or worst on the planet? Who, exactly, are the government trying to impress and to what purpose?
Area | PCT. above normal | Excess deaths | − | Reported Covid-19 deaths | = | Difference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
U.K. Mar. 14 - Apr. 17 | 55% | 31,500 | − | 20,904 | = | 10,600 |
Ecuador Mar. 1 - Apr. 22 | 82% | 9,900 | − | 842 | = | 9,000 |
Spain Mar. 16 - Apr. 12 | 82% | 25,400 | − | 16,921 | = | 8,500 |
France Mar. 16 - Apr. 12 | 47% | 20,600 | − | 14,266 | = | 6,400 |
New York City Mar. 11 - Apr. 25 | 309% | 20,800 | − | 16,673 | = | 4,200 |
Netherlands Mar. 16 - Apr. 12 | 52% | 6,100 | − | 3,151 | = | 3,000 |
Jakarta March | 57% | 1,600 | − | 84 | = | 1,500 |
Istanbul Mar. 9 - Apr. 26 | 31% | 3,100 | − | 1,683 | = | 1,400 |
Belgium Mar. 16 - Apr. 12 | 62% | 5,300 | − | 4,500 | = | 800 |
Switzerland Mar. 16 - Apr. 12 | 31% | 1,500 | − | 988 | = | 500 |
Germany Mar. 16 - Apr. 12 | 3% | 1,400 | − | 1,330 | = | 100 |
Sweden Mar. 16 - Apr. 19 | 24% | 2,100 | − | 1,998 | = | 100 |
Denmark Mar. 16 - Apr. 19 | 4% | 200 | − | 354 | = | <0 |
Norway Mar. 16 - Apr. 12 | Below normal | -100 | − | 124 | = | <0 |
"At least 46,000 more people have died during the coronavirus pandemic than the official Covid-19 death counts report, a review of mortality data in 14 countries shows — providing a clearer, if still incomplete, picture of the toll of the crisis. "
![]()
Area PCT. above normal Excess
deaths− Reported Covid-19 deaths = Difference U.K.
Mar. 14 - Apr. 1755% 31,500 − 20,904 = 10,600 Ecuador
Mar. 1 - Apr. 2282% 9,900 − 842 = 9,000 Spain
Mar. 16 - Apr. 1282% 25,400 − 16,921 = 8,500 France
Mar. 16 - Apr. 1247% 20,600 − 14,266 = 6,400 New York City
Mar. 11 - Apr. 25309% 20,800 − 16,673 = 4,200 Netherlands
Mar. 16 - Apr. 1252% 6,100 − 3,151 = 3,000 Jakarta
March57% 1,600 − 84 = 1,500 Istanbul
Mar. 9 - Apr. 2631% 3,100 − 1,683 = 1,400 Belgium
Mar. 16 - Apr. 1262% 5,300 − 4,500 = 800 Switzerland
Mar. 16 - Apr. 1231% 1,500 − 988 = 500 Germany
Mar. 16 - Apr. 123% 1,400 − 1,330 = 100 Sweden
Mar. 16 - Apr. 1924% 2,100 − 1,998 = 100 Denmark
Mar. 16 - Apr. 194% 200 − 354 = <0 Norway
Mar. 16 - Apr. 12Below normal -100 − 124 = <0
"These numbers undermine the notion that many people who have died from the virus may soon have died anyway. In Paris, more than twice the usual number of people have died each day, far more than the peak of a bad flu season. In New York City, the number has spiked to six times the normal amount.
The city has become the epicenter of the outbreak in the United States. More than 27,000 people have died since the beginning of March — 20,900 more than normal, and 4,200 more than have been captured by official death statistics."
Early lockdowns appeared to prevent excess deaths
In a handful of countries, including Norway and Denmark, there has been no clear sign of increased mortality this year. Demographers say this is due in part to a less severe flu season this winter — and because these countries implemented early, severe restrictions to slow the spread of the virus when their outbreaks were smaller and easier to contain.
![]()
Denmark announced a nationwide lockdown on March 11 before it had registered a single confirmed death. Norway announced a lockdown the next day, with just one confirmed death. In comparison to neighboring Sweden, which never implemented a national lockdown, Norway and Denmark have each recorded fewer than 500 Covid-19 deaths. Sweden has tallied over 2,500.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/04/21/world/coronavirus-missing-deaths.html
These really are excellent points
Slightly ashamed but I just totally verbatim stole this and mentioned it during a Microsoft Teams MDT meeting I'm having right now in response to our line manager who's anti-lockdown. Hoping they don't test my VPN to see that I get all my original COVID-19 ideas from a man utd fan online forum
It's the same old press thing of zero challenge to our shite response.Hong Kong installed them about 5 years ago. Even Italy, possibly the most disorganised country on the planet, is going as far as putting them in railway stations too.
The British notion that foreigners are, compared to us, always a disorganised rabble is ingrained, and won't change (except very gradually). Even my father & grandfather - from whom I literally never heard a racist word - would look at old news footage of, say, Egyptian workers in the Valley of the Kings and say things like: "Ha, look at that lot - every one of them wants to be the leader, and nothing's getting done properly. It's chaos."It's the same old press thing of zero challenge to our shite response.
That's what I mean about the, does it really work in lab tests question. I assume (but have no idea) that they have to dilute/wash the samples off the swabs anyway in individual tests - so maybe it's not a fundamental issue. Intriguing though, if it works, as it might open up a new route for (potentially faster) localised testing.Is that a smart way of doing things? I read somewhere that the tests could work if there were 3000 copies/mL .. any lower and it would register a negative..
Even if that is improved with time, wouldnt mixing 10 samples dilute it and potentially lead to more false negatives?
If the aim is to save lives where is the evidence that it is doing that?
Italy Dates | Italy Deaths | Spain Dates | Spain Deaths |
Feb-23rd | 3 | Mar 5th | 3 |
Feb 24th | 7 | Mar 6th | 8 |
Feb 25th | 11 | Mar 7th | 10 |
Feb 26th | 12 | Mar 8th | 17 |
Feb 27th | 17 | Mar 9th | 30 |
Feb 28th | 21 | Mar 10th | 36 |
Feb 29th | 29 | Mar 11th | 55 |
Mar 1st | 41 | Mar 12th | 86 |
Mar 2nd | 52 | Mar 13th | 133 |
Mar 3rd | 79 | Mar 14th | 196 |
Mar 4th | 107 | Mar 15th | 294 |
Mar 5th | 148 | Mar 16th | 342 |
Mar 6th | 197 | Mar 17th | 533 |
Mar 7th | 233 | Mar 18th | 638 |
Mar 8th | 366 | Mar 19th | 833 |
Mar 9th | 463 | Mar 20th | 1,093 |
Mar 10th | 631 | Mar 21st | 1,381 |
Mar 11th | 827 | Mar 22nd | 1,813 |
Mar 12th | 1,016 | Mar 23rd | 2,207 |
Mar 13th | 1,266 | Mar 24th | 2,696 |
Mar 14th | 1,441 | Mar 25th | 3,434 |
Mar 15th | 1,809 | Mar 26th | 4,145 |
Mar 16th | 2,158 | Mar 27th | 4,858 |
Mar 17th | 2,503 | Mar 28th | 5,690 |
Mar 18th | 2,978 | Mar 29th | 6,528 |
Mar 19th | 3,405 | Mar 30th | 7,340 |
Mar 20th | 4,032 | Mar 31st | 8,189 |
Mar 21st | 4,825 | Apr 1st | 9,053 |
Mar 22nd | 5,475 | Apr 2nd | 10,003 |
Mar 23rd | 6,077 | Apr 3rd | 10,935 |
Mar 24th | 6,820 | Apr 4th | 11,744 |
Mar 25th | 7,503 | Apr 5th | 12,418 |
Mar 26th | 8,215 | Apr 6th | 13,055 |
Mar 27th | 9,134 | Apr 7th | 13,798 |
Mar 28th | 10,023 | Apr 8th | 14,555 |
Mar 29th | 10,779 | Apr 9th | 15,238 |
Mar 30th | 11,591 | Apr 10th | 15,843 |
Mar 31st | 12,428 | Apr 11th | 16,353 |
Apr 1st | 13,155 | Apr 12th | 16,972 |
Apr 2nd | 13,915 | Apr 13th | 17,489 |
Apr 3rd | 14,681 | Apr 14th | 18,056 |
Apr 4th | 15,362 | Apr 15th | 18,579 |
Apr 5th | 15,887 | Apr 16th | 19,130 |
Apr 6th | 16,523 | Apr 17th | 19,478 |
Apr 7th | 17,127 | Apr 18th | 20,043 |
Apr 8th | 17,669 | Apr 19th | 20,453 |
Apr 9th | 18,279 | Apr 20th | 20,852 |
Apr 10th | 18,849 | Apr 21st | 21,282 |
Apr 11th | 19,468 | Apr 22nd | 21,717 |
Apr 12th | 19,899 | Apr 23rd | 22,157 |
Apr 13th | 20,465 | Apr 24th | 22,524 |
Apr 14th | 21,067 | Apr 25th | 22,902 |
Apr 15th | 21,645 | Apr 26th | 23,190 |
Apr 16th | 22,170 | Apr 27th | 23,521 |
Apr 17th | 22,745 | Apr 28th | 23,822 |
Apr 18th | 23,227 | Apr 29th | 24,275 |
Apr 19th | 23,660 | Apr 30th | 24,543 |
Apr 20th | 24,114 | May 1st | 24,824 |
Apr 21st | 24,648 | May 2nd | 25,100 |
Apr 22nd | 25,085 | May 3rd | 25,264 |
Apr 23rd | 25,549 | May 4th | 25,428 |
Apr 24th | 25,969 | May 5th | 25,613 |
Apr 25th | 26,384 | May 6th | 25,857 |
Apr 26th | 26,644 | | |
Apr 27th | 26,977 | | |
Apr 28th | 27,359 | | |
Apr 29th | 27,682 | ||
Apr 30th | 27,967 |
Isn’t part of the argument, that the government response (lockdown) has the potential knock on effect of killing people?!
Fear and huge financial strain caused by economic fallout leading increased stress/anxiety, causing increases in suicide rates etc.
more routine treatment/operations being missed, postponed, deferred resulting in undiagnosed or untreated cancers etc
Just did. That's great news. Can't find any figures on sensitivity and specificity (unlike Roche who published theirs) but has been validated by St.George's in London and Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine and results submitted to Public Health England. Also good is their aim to deliver up to 46000 tests per day. Encouraging.
Given how densely populated London is, how we're we not expected to top the charts? If I'm not mistaken the covid 0 patients passing it here was during a time no other country had locked down or closed borders. It seemed pretty inevitable, but I would also like to think earlier flight closures could have helped massively.
London isn't even that densely populated is it? not on the face of it when compared to Paris, Barcelona or Brussels etc. There could be more nuanced details like possibly Londoners work in closer proximity or have more packed transport but shouldn't be enough to excuse the death toll.
The biggest mindfeck for me on all of this is why have the UK not got stricter on border control / enforcing quarantine on people entering the country?!
It seems that those countries that have been stricter here have faired far better than we have!
My neighbours had to take their kid to temple street the other day - hurt himself in the trampoline. Apparently there were 3 other trampoline related injuries waiting tooIt’s a flawed argument because letting the virus spread unchecked will also cause all of the above.
When hospitals are overrun and news channels full of footage of young people dying for lack of a ventilator everyone will be so shit scared the vast majority will go into self imposed lockdown. They certainly won’t be out spending money like usual.
You’ll still get people with possible cancer too frightened to go to hospital to get checked out and the non-Covid healthcare services will be much worse hit than they are now, with a higher death rate across the board. There’s also an interesting phenomenon now where no sports, very little traffic and no pubs/clubs is keeping A&E departments quiet. Doesn’t bear thinking about the impact of unchecked Covid on top of business as usual.
I thought the same. But it is surprising how effective their PR is.Only halfwits and Daily Mail readers must be dim enough to actually believe in the rubbish this government is spouting.
Thanks for your posts in this thread, I always find them insightful and full of real clarity.I hear you, what I will say is that at around the peak of the pandemic in this country a major hospital ran out of oxygen, ICU capacity was reaching its peak
What we are seeing incidentally in people post-extubation in recovery from COVID19 is high instances of PTSD and withdrawal symptoms from the heavy sedation that have profound psychosocial implications including guilt and suicidal ideation. What would happen if we hadn't had the lockdown and indeed been or go back to business as usual is an even exponentially worse psychological impact on society.
Nobody underestimates the cost the lockdown is having on society. But mass graves, funerals with nobody attending, hospitals which consist not mainly of patients but of body bags, no oxygen or treatment was and still is a possibility if we let this thing overwhelm us.
I am grateful for still having family members of mine who are immunocompromised, frail for not having caught this thing including a niece who is 1 year old with an aggressive brain tumour that renders her white cell count at zero post-chemo. This disease is oxygen and ventilator-dependant and affects young and old. It has an incredibly profound impact not just on families of the dead but even those who recover.
That being said I agree that we need more with regards to improving safety nets for those impacted in addition to finding a way to ease restrictions and allow people to return to work but this has to be in adjunct with mass testing and surveillance programme to minimise spread.
Apparently, and I quote, there are a number of different ways to measure deaths.I see that the UK now has had the most deaths in Europe now. Time for Boris and Hancock to resign over their handling of this?
I thought the same. But it is surprising how effective their PR is.
A worrying proportion do believe it though- the UK equivalent of those millions in the US who've never had a passport.Only halfwits and Daily Mail readers must be dim enough to actually believe in the rubbish this government is spouting.