SARS CoV-2 coronavirus / Covid-19 (No tin foil hat silliness please)

I see that the UK now has had the most deaths in Europe now. Time for Boris and Hancock to resign over their handling of this?
 
These really are excellent points
Slightly ashamed but I just totally verbatim stole this and mentioned it during a Microsoft Teams MDT meeting I'm having right now in response to our line manager who's anti-lockdown. Hoping they don't test my VPN to see that I get all my original COVID-19 ideas from a man utd fan online forum

:lol:
 
Can't wait for the independent enquiry, led by Sir Montmorency Hyde-Cecil and Lady Beezlebub Tiffin, former Chairs of the Conservative Party.
 
These really are excellent points
Slightly ashamed but I just totally verbatim stole this and mentioned it during a Microsoft Teams MDT meeting I'm having right now in response to our line manager who's anti-lockdown. Hoping they don't test my VPN to see that I get all my original COVID-19 ideas from a man utd fan online forum

If this isn't worthy of some kind of tagline, I don't know what is.
 
An interesting story from the BBC on "pool testing" of samples for coronavirus in Ghana. Basically taking samples from a group of (ten for example) people and testing them all simultaneously. Then, if you get a positive result, you test the ten samples individually.

Obviously the advantages of such an approach would only be felt if coronavirus is a rarity in the group you're testing.

It did make me start thinking about testing entire football squads, or classes of kids, or families, or even carehomes every couple of days. Though, I must admit I was surprised that the approach might work at all in lab terms - it does say Germany and India have tried it as well, so hopefully there's good news on that front.

The BBC story:
Ghana has adopted "pool testing" of samples to maximise the use of coronavirus test kits that are in short supply globally.

It involves testing up to 10 samples in a single test. If any of the samples tests positive, then the entire batch is tested individually to identify the infected sample.

Scientists believe that the method is a valuable time saver in the fight against Covid-19 and has seen Ghana test more than 100,000 samples so far.

But it is only efficient while Ghana's infection rates remain low and the accuracy of the method has been disputed in some quarters.

"The limitations come in when the majority of the wells test positive in which case you have to rerun the majority of the pooled samples again and you lose the benefit of the efficiency of doing them concurrently," says Nana Kofi Quakyi, a research fellow at New York University’s School of Public Health.

Germany and India have adopted similar methods in testing for the virus - allowing them to expand their screening capacity and improve detection in communities.

Ghana's medical drones have being deployed to deliver Covid-19 samples directly to laboratories, the first country to do so in the world.

This enables authorities to identify and isolate infected persons quickly and contain the spread of the virus.
Is that a smart way of doing things? I read somewhere that the tests could work if there were 3000 copies/mL .. any lower and it would register a negative..
Even if that is improved with time, wouldnt mixing 10 samples dilute it and potentially lead to more false negatives?
 
Fair enough which is why I said so, but you don't think my opinions hold any merit at all? The fact of the matter is, there are countries where a lockdown hadn't been imposed and are doing well due to a solid testing, tracing and isolating regime, although admittedly this is easier said than done.

I think your points were just about totally wrong - in some cases because there is nuance involved.

Where you.started lockdown from has a huge affect. Sometimes it is early enough to limit and virtually eliminate the virus and in others it happens too late, so minimising spread is the best case scenrio. In all cases lockdown provides a health benefit.

Just look at California compared to other states.
 
I see that the UK now has had the most deaths in Europe now. Time for Boris and Hancock to resign over their handling of this?

They are still trying to convince the public that they are world leaders in the fight against the Corona Virus.
 
Im on an NFL forum as well and have just seen a guy post this about the wearing of masks in public:

"It’s just a symbol of oppression. Showing that gov is controlling you"

It’s galling that America’s response has pivoted so hard.

It’s as if someone verbalised the thought “They don’t care that they’re dying...” and acted accordingly.
 
Definitely, that's a bigger rate limiting step than the swabs which will have to be overcome if this antibody test comes through. From the phleb clinics I've seen in most GP practices and in hospital outpatients or cancer units they can do blood sampling remarkable quickly and see a lot of patients but its trickier I think with PPE etc.

Most importantly I've lost a lot of trust in government to sort out healthcare problems that require heavy-duty or mass scale logistics. Will be more than happy to be proven wrong on this.

there is a govt backed consortium who are making a finger prick home based antibody test. Should hopefully be ready end of may.
Google odx they are the company who will be making them.
 
They are still trying to convince the public that they are world leaders in the fight against the Corona Virus.
I don't understand why they even use this Trumpian tactic. Do they think it really matters to those who are suffering, have suffered, or might potentially suffer, if Britain is the best or worst on the planet? Who, exactly, are the government trying to impress and to what purpose?
 
I see that the UK now has had the most deaths in Europe now. Time for Boris and Hancock to resign over their handling of this?

A conservative leadership election and lame duck stand in PM is just what we need.

I can get behind the emotion of the idea but in practice...
 
My mum has severe mental health issues and I'm not even allowed to see her to check she is ok.

Walking on eggshells to not sound even vaguely antagonistic here....

But what’s stopping you seeing her?

No obligation to answer. At all.

If it’s physical locked doors and red tape, I get it.

But if it’s just government messaging, I don’t think you shouldn’t listen to it, if you can ignore it responsibly.
 
there is a govt backed consortium who are making a finger prick home based antibody test. Should hopefully be ready end of may.
Google odx they are the company who will be making them.

Just did. That's great news. Can't find any figures on sensitivity and specificity (unlike Roche who published theirs) but has been validated by St.George's in London and Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine and results submitted to Public Health England. Also good is their aim to deliver up to 46000 tests per day. Encouraging.
 
I don't understand why they even use this Trumpian tactic. Do they think it really matters to those who are suffering, have suffered, or might potentially suffer, if Britain is the best or worst on the planet? Who, exactly, are the government trying to impress and to what purpose?

It is simply because they believe that the public will be happy to swallow all of the lies and propaganda they boast about.
 
"At least 46,000 more people have died during the coronavirus pandemic than the official Covid-19 death counts report, a review of mortality data in 14 countries shows — providing a clearer, if still incomplete, picture of the toll of the crisis. "

l2CMvi8.jpg



AreaPCT. above normalExcess
deaths
Reported Covid-19 deaths=Difference
U.K.
Mar. 14 - Apr. 17
55%31,50020,904=10,600
Ecuador
Mar. 1 - Apr. 22
82%9,900842=9,000
Spain
Mar. 16 - Apr. 12
82%25,40016,921=8,500
France
Mar. 16 - Apr. 12
47%20,60014,266=6,400
New York City
Mar. 11 - Apr. 25
309%20,80016,673=4,200
Netherlands
Mar. 16 - Apr. 12
52%6,1003,151=3,000
Jakarta
March
57%1,60084=1,500
Istanbul
Mar. 9 - Apr. 26
31%3,1001,683=1,400
Belgium
Mar. 16 - Apr. 12
62%5,3004,500=800
Switzerland
Mar. 16 - Apr. 12
31%1,500988=500
Germany
Mar. 16 - Apr. 12
3%1,4001,330=100
Sweden
Mar. 16 - Apr. 19
24%2,1001,998=100
Denmark
Mar. 16 - Apr. 19
4%200354=<0
Norway
Mar. 16 - Apr. 12
Below normal-100124=<0

"These numbers undermine the notion that many people who have died from the virus may soon have died anyway. In Paris, more than twice the usual number of people have died each day, far more than the peak of a bad flu season. In New York City, the number has spiked to six times the normal amount.


The city has become the epicenter of the outbreak in the United States. More than 27,000 people have died since the beginning of March — 20,900 more than normal, and 4,200 more than have been captured by official death statistics."


Early lockdowns appeared to prevent excess deaths

In a handful of countries, including Norway and Denmark, there has been no clear sign of increased mortality this year. Demographers say this is due in part to a less severe flu season this winter — and because these countries implemented early, severe restrictions to slow the spread of the virus when their outbreaks were smaller and easier to contain.

vng8Tbx.jpg



Denmark announced a nationwide lockdown on March 11 before it had registered a single confirmed death. Norway announced a lockdown the next day, with just one confirmed death. In comparison to neighboring Sweden, which never implemented a national lockdown, Norway and Denmark have each recorded fewer than 500 Covid-19 deaths. Sweden has tallied over 2,500.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/04/21/world/coronavirus-missing-deaths.html
 
Johnson said this morning that he plans to ease some lockdown restrictions. Does he not realise that numerous citizens will now take it as read to behave exactly as they please?
 
"At least 46,000 more people have died during the coronavirus pandemic than the official Covid-19 death counts report, a review of mortality data in 14 countries shows — providing a clearer, if still incomplete, picture of the toll of the crisis. "

l2CMvi8.jpg



AreaPCT. above normalExcess
deaths
Reported Covid-19 deaths=Difference
U.K.
Mar. 14 - Apr. 17
55%31,50020,904=10,600
Ecuador
Mar. 1 - Apr. 22
82%9,900842=9,000
Spain
Mar. 16 - Apr. 12
82%25,40016,921=8,500
France
Mar. 16 - Apr. 12
47%20,60014,266=6,400
New York City
Mar. 11 - Apr. 25
309%20,80016,673=4,200
Netherlands
Mar. 16 - Apr. 12
52%6,1003,151=3,000
Jakarta
March
57%1,60084=1,500
Istanbul
Mar. 9 - Apr. 26
31%3,1001,683=1,400
Belgium
Mar. 16 - Apr. 12
62%5,3004,500=800
Switzerland
Mar. 16 - Apr. 12
31%1,500988=500
Germany
Mar. 16 - Apr. 12
3%1,4001,330=100
Sweden
Mar. 16 - Apr. 19
24%2,1001,998=100
Denmark
Mar. 16 - Apr. 19
4%200354=<0
Norway
Mar. 16 - Apr. 12
Below normal-100124=<0

"These numbers undermine the notion that many people who have died from the virus may soon have died anyway. In Paris, more than twice the usual number of people have died each day, far more than the peak of a bad flu season. In New York City, the number has spiked to six times the normal amount.


The city has become the epicenter of the outbreak in the United States. More than 27,000 people have died since the beginning of March — 20,900 more than normal, and 4,200 more than have been captured by official death statistics."


Early lockdowns appeared to prevent excess deaths

In a handful of countries, including Norway and Denmark, there has been no clear sign of increased mortality this year. Demographers say this is due in part to a less severe flu season this winter — and because these countries implemented early, severe restrictions to slow the spread of the virus when their outbreaks were smaller and easier to contain.

vng8Tbx.jpg



Denmark announced a nationwide lockdown on March 11 before it had registered a single confirmed death. Norway announced a lockdown the next day, with just one confirmed death. In comparison to neighboring Sweden, which never implemented a national lockdown, Norway and Denmark have each recorded fewer than 500 Covid-19 deaths. Sweden has tallied over 2,500.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/04/21/world/coronavirus-missing-deaths.html

Uk topping the charts again.
 
These really are excellent points
Slightly ashamed but I just totally verbatim stole this and mentioned it during a Microsoft Teams MDT meeting I'm having right now in response to our line manager who's anti-lockdown. Hoping they don't test my VPN to see that I get all my original COVID-19 ideas from a man utd fan online forum

:D

Yeah, nothing professional for me of course, but I've even found myself fudging my sources when talking to the family.

I sent a couple of them oximeters with explanations of their role from here. I warned another friend who's on blood thinners that monitoring her blood could be even more critical than normal at the moment (- she can self test but had run out of lancets, and was nervous about collecting them).

"I pick up my covid news on a United forum," doesn't sound that convincing.
 
Hong Kong installed them about 5 years ago. Even Italy, possibly the most disorganised country on the planet, is going as far as putting them in railway stations too.
It's the same old press thing of zero challenge to our shite response.
 
Given how densely populated London is, how we're we not expected to top the charts? If I'm not mistaken the covid 0 patients passing it here was during a time no other country had locked down or closed borders. It seemed pretty inevitable, but I would also like to think earlier flight closures could have helped massively.
 
It's the same old press thing of zero challenge to our shite response.
The British notion that foreigners are, compared to us, always a disorganised rabble is ingrained, and won't change (except very gradually). Even my father & grandfather - from whom I literally never heard a racist word - would look at old news footage of, say, Egyptian workers in the Valley of the Kings and say things like: "Ha, look at that lot - every one of them wants to be the leader, and nothing's getting done properly. It's chaos."
 
Is that a smart way of doing things? I read somewhere that the tests could work if there were 3000 copies/mL .. any lower and it would register a negative..
Even if that is improved with time, wouldnt mixing 10 samples dilute it and potentially lead to more false negatives?
That's what I mean about the, does it really work in lab tests question. I assume (but have no idea) that they have to dilute/wash the samples off the swabs anyway in individual tests - so maybe it's not a fundamental issue. Intriguing though, if it works, as it might open up a new route for (potentially faster) localised testing.
 
New York City and State are off the charts in regards to 10-19 million pop and 25k+ deaths. In areas like this it's spread far before the deaths roll in.

If the aim is to save lives where is the evidence that it is doing that?

Looking at Spain and Italy is a good way to see what happens.

In Spain it spread very fast in Madrid and Spain started outpacing Italy by double the amount of deaths in a country with a much smaller population and is now under Italy by locking down. There's still many deaths and unfortunately for large countries with large tourism and travel with densely populated areas it's got a grip before they can possibly react but you' don't let the fire burn the whole mansion down, you put it out. There's millions of old people and people of all ages with underlying conditions in each country which have avoided this virus so far and we can buy some time to get test labs and stations in place, equipment made and ordered, take stock and come out different with routine testing, tracing and distancing, maybe even find treatments and better ways to manage patients plus most of all avoid overwhelming the hospitals.

Italy Dates​
Italy Deaths​
Spain Dates​
Spain Deaths​
Feb-23rd​
3​
Mar 5th​
3​
Feb 24th​
7​
Mar 6th​
8​
Feb 25th​
11​
Mar 7th​
10​
Feb 26th​
12​
Mar 8th​
17​
Feb 27th​
17​
Mar 9th​
30​
Feb 28th​
21​
Mar 10th​
36​
Feb 29th​
29​
Mar 11th​
55​
Mar 1st​
41​
Mar 12th​
86​
Mar 2nd​
52​
Mar 13th​
133​
Mar 3rd​
79​
Mar 14th​
196​
Mar 4th​
107​
Mar 15th​
294​
Mar 5th​
148​
Mar 16th​
342​
Mar 6th​
197​
Mar 17th​
533​
Mar 7th​
233​
Mar 18th​
638​
Mar 8th​
366​
Mar 19th​
833​
Mar 9th​
463​
Mar 20th​
1,093​
Mar 10th​
631​
Mar 21st​
1,381​
Mar 11th​
827​
Mar 22nd​
1,813​
Mar 12th​
1,016​
Mar 23rd​
2,207​
Mar 13th​
1,266​
Mar 24th​
2,696​
Mar 14th​
1,441​
Mar 25th​
3,434​
Mar 15th​
1,809​
Mar 26th​
4,145​
Mar 16th​
2,158​
Mar 27th​
4,858​
Mar 17th​
2,503​
Mar 28th​
5,690​
Mar 18th​
2,978​
Mar 29th​
6,528​
Mar 19th​
3,405​
Mar 30th​
7,340​
Mar 20th​
4,032​
Mar 31st​
8,189​
Mar 21st​
4,825​
Apr 1st​
9,053​
Mar 22nd​
5,475​
Apr 2nd​
10,003​
Mar 23rd​
6,077​
Apr 3rd​
10,935​
Mar 24th​
6,820​
Apr 4th​
11,744​
Mar 25th​
7,503​
Apr 5th​
12,418​
Mar 26th​
8,215​
Apr 6th​
13,055​
Mar 27th​
9,134​
Apr 7th​
13,798​
Mar 28th​
10,023​
Apr 8th​
14,555​
Mar 29th​
10,779​
Apr 9th​
15,238​
Mar 30th​
11,591​
Apr 10th​
15,843​
Mar 31st​
12,428​
Apr 11th​
16,353​
Apr 1st​
13,155​
Apr 12th​
16,972​
Apr 2nd​
13,915​
Apr 13th​
17,489​
Apr 3rd​
14,681​
Apr 14th​
18,056​
Apr 4th​
15,362​
Apr 15th​
18,579​
Apr 5th​
15,887​
Apr 16th​
19,130​
Apr 6th​
16,523​
Apr 17th​
19,478​
Apr 7th​
17,127​
Apr 18th​
20,043​
Apr 8th​
17,669​
Apr 19th​
20,453​
Apr 9th​
18,279​
Apr 20th​
20,852​
Apr 10th​
18,849​
Apr 21st​
21,282​
Apr 11th​
19,468​
Apr 22nd​
21,717​
Apr 12th​
19,899​
Apr 23rd​
22,157​
Apr 13th​
20,465​
Apr 24th​
22,524​
Apr 14th​
21,067​
Apr 25th​
22,902​
Apr 15th​
21,645​
Apr 26th​
23,190​
Apr 16th​
22,170​
Apr 27th​
23,521​
Apr 17th​
22,745​
Apr 28th​
23,822​
Apr 18th​
23,227​
Apr 29th​
24,275​
Apr 19th​
23,660​
Apr 30th​
24,543​
Apr 20th​
24,114​
May 1st​
24,824​
Apr 21st​
24,648​
May 2nd​
25,100​
Apr 22nd​
25,085​
May 3rd​
25,264​
Apr 23rd​
25,549​
May 4th​
25,428​
Apr 24th​
25,969​
May 5th​
25,613​
Apr 25th​
26,384​
May 6th​
25,857​
Apr 26th​
26,644​
Apr 27th​
26,977​
Apr 28th​
27,359​
Apr 29th27,682
Apr 30th27,967



 
Last edited:
Isn’t part of the argument, that the government response (lockdown) has the potential knock on effect of killing people?!

Fear and huge financial strain caused by economic fallout leading increased stress/anxiety, causing increases in suicide rates etc.

more routine treatment/operations being missed, postponed, deferred resulting in undiagnosed or untreated cancers etc

These are probably some of the reasons why the government of my country, Indonesia, in the last minute decided to go against a lockdown and opted for a large-scale enforced social distancing in so-called 'danger zones' such as Jakarta instead. People living in poverty, to which there are millions here, are stressed enough without these countermeasures let alone a full lockdown. Here, offices but a few exceptions for several key sectors, factories, retail stores and shopping malls are closed; social, cultural and religious events are banned; restaurants and street hawkers (a major source of livelihood for many) are takeaway only; banks, supermarkets, most informal markets (another very large source of livelihood for many) and corner shops are open with social distancing protocols in place. Intra-province public transport is open whilst inter-province travel is banned for everyone unless for extraordinary circumstances and this requires a special permit. Those measures have fortunately slowed down the growth of corona cases and deaths in Jakarta, although testing hasn't been up to par.

I just don't think there's a one-size-fits-all solution in slowing down the spread of virus. Lockdowns in general help, of course, but it's not the be all and all. Take Jakarta. You have hundreds of thousands, most likely even millions, of people here living in squalid conditions in our shantytowns. Folks there earn their meagre wages daily, a twenty square meter room is often shared with five to six people and toilets are public. How are you going to impose a lockdown for an extended period of time when taking such circumstances into account? Without sacrificing people's livelihoods and probably even lives, you can't, because the government of a developing economy like Indonesia just don't have enough money to support the livelihoods of millions for an extended period of time. This is why I've always been sceptical when governments (especially of developing countries) shout lockdown left and right without considering its long-term implications.

As difficult to implement as it may be, I'm proponent of a more balanced approach for this reason: a 'soft' lockdown and coupled with an overzealous test, track and isolate regime, but then again different countries are different! In Indonesia's case -- despite the fact that our government, in my opinion, has done the right thing by opting against a full lockdown -- needs to do a lot more in the testing, tracking and isolating front.

I wonder what @Sky1981 has to say about this.
 
Just did. That's great news. Can't find any figures on sensitivity and specificity (unlike Roche who published theirs) but has been validated by St.George's in London and Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine and results submitted to Public Health England. Also good is their aim to deliver up to 46000 tests per day. Encouraging.

there have been a few indications that it’ll be 99%+
just waiting on confirmation from phe which should be in the next day or two (was submitted a couple of weeks ago and it usually takes a couple of weeks). then the design will be frozen and they can get on with making them.
Boris is making a big announcement on Sunday and I expect he’ll trumpet this as a success.
 
Given how densely populated London is, how we're we not expected to top the charts? If I'm not mistaken the covid 0 patients passing it here was during a time no other country had locked down or closed borders. It seemed pretty inevitable, but I would also like to think earlier flight closures could have helped massively.

London isn't even that densely populated is it? not on the face of it when compared to Paris, Barcelona or Brussels etc. There could be more nuanced details like possibly Londoners work in closer proximity or have more packed transport but shouldn't be enough to excuse the death toll.
 
London isn't even that densely populated is it? not on the face of it when compared to Paris, Barcelona or Brussels etc. There could be more nuanced details like possibly Londoners work in closer proximity or have more packed transport but shouldn't be enough to excuse the death toll.

The population of London is greater than Paris, Barcelona and Brussels combined isn't it? It's densely populated enough to spread like wildfire and with that many people it seems a higher death total was an inevitability.
 
The biggest mindfeck for me on all of this is why have the UK not got stricter on border control / enforcing quarantine on people entering the country?!

It seems that those countries that have been stricter here have faired far better than we have!

“Taking back control” means doing bugger all when the shit is hitting the fan
 
It’s a flawed argument because letting the virus spread unchecked will also cause all of the above.

When hospitals are overrun and news channels full of footage of young people dying for lack of a ventilator everyone will be so shit scared the vast majority will go into self imposed lockdown. They certainly won’t be out spending money like usual.

You’ll still get people with possible cancer too frightened to go to hospital to get checked out and the non-Covid healthcare services will be much worse hit than they are now, with a higher death rate across the board. There’s also an interesting phenomenon now where no sports, very little traffic and no pubs/clubs is keeping A&E departments quiet. Doesn’t bear thinking about the impact of unchecked Covid on top of business as usual.
My neighbours had to take their kid to temple street the other day - hurt himself in the trampoline. Apparently there were 3 other trampoline related injuries waiting too
 
I hear you, what I will say is that at around the peak of the pandemic in this country a major hospital ran out of oxygen, ICU capacity was reaching its peak

What we are seeing incidentally in people post-extubation in recovery from COVID19 is high instances of PTSD and withdrawal symptoms from the heavy sedation that have profound psychosocial implications including guilt and suicidal ideation. What would happen if we hadn't had the lockdown and indeed been or go back to business as usual is an even exponentially worse psychological impact on society.

Nobody underestimates the cost the lockdown is having on society. But mass graves, funerals with nobody attending, hospitals which consist not mainly of patients but of body bags, no oxygen or treatment was and still is a possibility if we let this thing overwhelm us.

I am grateful for still having family members of mine who are immunocompromised, frail for not having caught this thing including a niece who is 1 year old with an aggressive brain tumour that renders her white cell count at zero post-chemo. This disease is oxygen and ventilator-dependant and affects young and old. It has an incredibly profound impact not just on families of the dead but even those who recover.

That being said I agree that we need more with regards to improving safety nets for those impacted in addition to finding a way to ease restrictions and allow people to return to work but this has to be in adjunct with mass testing and surveillance programme to minimise spread.
Thanks for your posts in this thread, I always find them insightful and full of real clarity.
Thanks for your hard work too obviously!
 


Wrong questions, he should be asking for the modelling to be made publically available. There will have been models that show how many fewer cases we theoretically would have had if we'd have locked down earlier. On top of that the impact of us abandoning community test and trace.

Of course there's an argument that it's delaying the inevitable but you can have the debate now in the context of decisions we've already made. The current numbers alone aren't a useful indictator of effectiveness.
 
Second phase of downsizing the lockdown in Belgium starts on Sunday, some small changes:

- 4 persons can come and visit you, but always the same 4.
- All shops can reopen on Monday. Only 1 customer per 10 m², and a maximum of 30 minutes inside the shop.
- Masks are recommended. Mandatory on public transport.

Next steps will be taken on May 18th, if everything goes according to plan. Museums and libraries would probably reopen, hairdressers can go back to work, more people allowed at weddings and funerals...

Nothing about bars and restaurants yet. Competitive sports are forbidden until 31/07.

We are at about 40.000 tests per million inhabitants at the moment.
 
Only halfwits and Daily Mail readers must be dim enough to actually believe in the rubbish this government is spouting.
A worrying proportion do believe it though- the UK equivalent of those millions in the US who've never had a passport.