SARS CoV-2 coronavirus / Covid-19 (No tin foil hat silliness please)

I'd be careful with a direct comparison of different countries. As the New York Times and the Economist have reported, Sweden is one of the countries that count Covid-related deaths correctly and their mortality has barely increased compared to the same period last year. Other places such as Lombardy and the Netherlands have a big gap between excess mortality and official Covid death tolls suggesting massive undercounting of the latter. Unfortunately that analysis didn't include data for the other Scandinavian countries.

On the other hand, Germany has actually had fewer deaths compared to last year. Not sure what to make of that. While we've had stricter measures than Sweden, we never went into lockdown either and could go outside as much and as often as we want.
Did Germany not lock their borders down pretty quickly?
 
Hang on Wibs... why have Belgium done so poorly? They locked down early and their response was superb: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_coronavirus_pandemic_in_Belgium#Government_response

Lockdowns had feck all effect for France, Belgium because they were riddled with the virus pre-lockdown. France locked down extremely "well" in anyone's eyes on 17th March, Belgium on the 18th, 5 days before Australia. Australia locked down on the same day as the UK ffs.

The alps seeded Europe in a huge way, and Australia & NZ fortunately are on the other side of the World.
Re Belgium
Because they are an international hub of major Organizations with people flying in from everywhere, I’m guessing they got it pre-lockdown too.

Imho the best or most important part of lockdown is how quickly you lock down your borders over everything else. Then you can trace and test. So obviously the quicker your border is locked down the better.

UK fecked up in this area despite banging on for years about taking control of their own borders. They literally ran brexit on that policy. Here was their chance to show it and they fecked up
 
So they were riddled with it and got it under control but still according to you lockdown had feck all effect? Right

Feck all effect with the death number so far or with them keeping it out of care homes so far.

Did you even read the conversation before responding?

I didn’t say they haven’t now managed to get deaths per day down, but so have non-lockdown Sweden. Which was the point, the poster was arguing that Sweden not locking down is the reason they have so many deaths now, and my response was that lockdown in Belgium and their brilliant response didn’t keep deaths so far down. Both countries responses have flattened the curve though and got the deaths per day on the slide.
 
Last edited:
UK fecked up in this area despite banging on for years about taking control of their own borders. They literally ran brexit on that policy. Here was their chance to show it and they fecked up


Utter bollocks. So the millions of British nationals returning from their european Feburary holiday including god knows how many school trips should have been refused entry because of Brexit. What is your excuse then for Italy, Spain and France amongst others?
 
Re Belgium
Because they are an international hub of major Organizations with people flying in from everywhere, I’m guessing they got it pre-lockdown too.

Imho the best or most important part of lockdown is how quickly you lock down your borders over everything else. Then you can trace and test. So obviously the quicker your border is locked down the better.

UK fecked up in this area despite banging on for years about taking control of their own borders. They literally ran brexit on that policy. Here was their chance to show it and they fecked up

Locking borders sounds sensible in theory but just isn’t possible in practice. Especially in the EU, where so many fragile supply chains rely on freedom of movement. Not to mention the right of freedom of movement for citizens. You can’t just stop thousands of people coming home from holiday and ask other countries to look after our citizens instead. In Ireland school trips seems to be the source of a lot of cases. Should we not have allowed those kids return to their families?
 
Malmö county has done as well, if not better than Oslo county, not because of lockdown, but because both Oslo and Malmö started a long way back from Stockholm. Not everyone started this race on the same start line, not even close. Belgium is clear evidence of that because their response has been excellent, yet they got fecked anyway.

With all due respect, this is getting very, very tiresome. I've just laid out for you how Norway in general, just like Stockholm, (and unlike Malmö according to your holiday analysis), had the virus unexpectedly and silently imported from Austria, and you've chosen to blatantly ignore it. When Norway introduced the restrictions, Stockholm had just over 300 confirmed cases in their 2,3 million population. Oslo had 166 confirmed cases in their 700k population. In other words, Oslo had a worse starting point than Stockholm, with a recently estimated R0 of 3.47 in March before the restrictions (in other words; rampant), reduced to 0.88 a month later.

I'm really not here to pick a fight, but please refrain from making sh*t up.
 
Utter bollocks. So the millions of British nationals returning from their european Feburary holiday including god knows how many school trips should have been refused entry because of Brexit. What is your excuse then for Italy, Spain and France amongst others?
That’s ridiculous - off course you let your citizens back in, with tests and quarantine if necessary.
They literally had an opportunity to show how they could control the borders and did feck all. How is that bollocks?

So I take it you are saying then that airports should just have been open willy nilly?
 
Locking borders sounds sensible in theory but just isn’t possible in practice. Especially in the EU, where so many fragile supply chains rely on freedom of movement. Not to mention the right of freedom of movement for citizens. You can’t just stop thousands of people coming home from holiday and ask other countries to look after our citizens instead. In Ireland school trips seems to be the source of a lot of cases. Should we not have allowed those kids return to their families?


I was listening to a podcast yesterday whereby they talking about the severe problems locked borders could cause unless relaxed soon, due to breaking down of supply chains for essential food etc. Apparently the UN have flagged that unless this is relaxed soon, millions of people could starve to death around the world - another example of lockdowns causing far more damage than the virus itself unless we're very careful. Which again, is why soon enough most countries will be using the 'lack of approach' Sweden have used - the alternative is the threat to the human race altogether.
 
Locking borders sounds sensible in theory but just isn’t possible in practice. Especially in the EU, where so many fragile supply chains rely on freedom of movement. Not to mention the right of freedom of movement for citizens. You can’t just stop thousands of people coming home from holiday and ask other countries to look after our citizens instead. In Ireland school trips seems to be the source of a lot of cases. Should we not have allowed those kids return to their families?
Maybe my post wasn’t clear, as people are missing the point.

Off course let your citizens return home. Test, quarantine and keep track of them.

Close airports, land borders and sea borders to everyone else apart from essential supply chains. There was no need for Heathrow just letting thousands in every day (can’t be all people returning from short holidays!), for weeks, without ANY checks. Taking control of borders? Literally no control!
 
Locking borders sounds sensible in theory but just isn’t possible in practice. Especially in the EU, where so many fragile supply chains rely on freedom of movement. Not to mention the right of freedom of movement for citizens. You can’t just stop thousands of people coming home from holiday and ask other countries to look after our citizens instead. In Ireland school trips seems to be the source of a lot of cases. Should we not have allowed those kids return to their families?
the issue is more taking zero precautions when people come and go, see samsky earlier in this thread thinking it's fine for him to go about his life after international travel because there was nothing telling him otherwise

the supply chain is one thing, people travelling then immediately mingling with others is hella bad - the school trips kids and their families should have been in 2 weeks isolations soon as the kids got in for example
 
the issue is more taking zero precautions when people come and go, see samsky earlier in this thread thinking it's fine for him to go about his life after international travel because there was nothing telling him otherwise

the supply chain is one thing, people travelling then immediately mingling with others is hella bad - the school trips kids and their families should have been in 2 weeks isolations soon as the kids got in for example
Exactly
 
I dont know why people keep comparing the situation in Belgium with, lets say Sweden. We are one of the densest populated countries in the world, an international hub of transport, we hold tons of big organisations that require travel, massive amounts of Belgians travel abroad each year and a ton of people work across the border. Do we have a high death toll? Yes. About 60% of all deaths occur in nursing homes and are suspected Covid victims. Would other countries have a much higher death toll if they counted the same way? Absolutely. Would we have a massive amount of extra deaths if the lockdown wouldn't have happened? Without a doubt. The Belgian people are happy with the lockdown and are looking forward to the restrictions being lifted.

I live in a small town of about 5000 people. 30 people have died in 1 nursing home because of Covid, as one nurse who came back from Austria was infected. Thank feck for the lockdown or it could have happened across the entire country.
 
Utter bollocks. So the millions of British nationals returning from their european Feburary holiday including god knows how many school trips should have been refused entry because of Brexit. What is your excuse then for Italy, Spain and France amongst others?
Youve totally misunderstood what he was saying
 
the issue is more taking zero precautions when people come and go, see samsky earlier in this thread thinking it's fine for him to go about his life after international travel because there was nothing telling him otherwise

the supply chain is one thing, people travelling then immediately mingling with others is hella bad - the school trips kids and their families should have been in 2 weeks isolations soon as the kids got in for example

Agree with last couple of sentences. Said something similar myself yesterday. Not doing that was most obvious single issue balls up by many countries. School trips from Northern Italy mingling with everyone else at school the very next day. Madness.
 
Isn't it a problem having Johnson - whose entire public image is about positivity and optimism (read: mindless cheer-leading & jingoism) - in charge of a decision about ending the lockdown?
 



Yep. The scare-mongering is in force again. Germany have not even suggested remotely that they are so worried about that miniscule fluctuation (that was overblown in the headlines), they've just advised people to continue to be mindful and use social distancing, nothing else. But people can't wait to jump on these negative headlines as proof that lockdown is 'failing' in Germany.

Anyone with a brain know that the infection rate is going to bobble up and down, to some degree.

Bad news sells, basically. Nobody is clickign on a headline that says "Nothing has changed in Germany". That doesn't make for sensational news.
 
I dont know why people keep comparing the situation in Belgium with, lets say Sweden. We are one of the densest populated countries in the world, an international hub of transport, we hold tons of big organisations that require travel, massive amounts of Belgians travel abroad each year and a ton of people work across the border. Do we have a high death toll? Yes. About 60% of all deaths occur in nursing homes and are suspected Covid victims. Would other countries have a much higher death toll if they counted the same way? Absolutely. Would we have a massive amount of extra deaths if the lockdown wouldn't have happened? Without a doubt. The Belgian people are happy with the lockdown and are looking forward to the restrictions being lifted.

I live in a small town of about 5000 people. 30 people have died in 1 nursing home because of Covid, as one nurse who came back from Austria was infected. Thank feck for the lockdown or it could have happened across the entire country.

I really wonder how many lives would have been spared if the Austrian afterski bars had taken precautions and been open with their customers. It seeems like all neighboring countries and scandinavia imported thousands upon thousands of cases from Austria. approx 600 came back positive to Norway from there. I remember a norwegian employee at a bar there was warned by her boss when she tried discussing the infection dangers, and when she warned others on Facebook the owner wrote please stop this is damaging to our business. People were crammed in those places and people working were sick already and still worked.
 
When Norway introduced the restrictions, Stockholm had just over 300 confirmed cases in their 2,3 million population. Oslo had 166 confirmed cases in their 700k population.

You realise surely that ”confirmed cases” means absolutely zitch here right?

or just explain to me why Malmö county is doing better than Oslo? Can you give me any explanation for that?

Tiresome indeed. You’re completely fecking ignoring that Stockholm had week 9 half term, Malmö, Oslo, GBG week 7-8... how can you ignore just what a massive difference that is in the alps during that period? Anyone who understands anything about exponential growth understands how important that variable is.

My entire point isn’t to say that Sweden is doing as well or better than Norway or Belgium or any other country, for the record I think Norway has done a tremendous job thus far, but I also think the Belgian response was exemplary.
My point is that none of us know the most important variable, and confirmed cases tell us absolutely nothing with this virus, as it barely effects the majority of people. Comparing countries and their strategies/responses at this stage is still utterly ridiculous and utterly unscientific, wait a few more months, then we’ll know much better.
 
Last edited:
Yep. The scare-mongering is in force again. Germany have not even suggested remotely that they are so worried about that miniscule fluctuation (that was overblown in the headlines), they've just advised people to continue to be mindful and use social distancing, nothing else. But people can't wait to jump on these negative headlines as proof that lockdown is 'failing' in Germany.

Anyone with a brain know that the infection rate is going to bobble up and down, to some degree.

Bad news sells, basically. Nobody is clickign on a headline that says "Nothing has changed in Germany". That doesn't make for sensational news.
I remember the posts on here regarding it, it's almost as if they were getting off on breaking the news to us.
 
I dont know why people keep comparing the situation in Belgium with, lets say Sweden. We are one of the densest populated countries in the world, an international hub of transport, we hold tons of big organisations that require travel, massive amounts of Belgians travel abroad each year and a ton of people work across the border. Do we have a high death toll? Yes. About 60% of all deaths occur in nursing homes and are suspected Covid victims. Would other countries have a much higher death toll if they counted the same way? Absolutely. Would we have a massive amount of extra deaths if the lockdown wouldn't have happened? Without a doubt. The Belgian people are happy with the lockdown and are looking forward to the restrictions being lifted.

I live in a small town of about 5000 people. 30 people have died in 1 nursing home because of Covid, as one nurse who came back from Austria was infected. Thank feck for the lockdown or it could have happened across the entire country.

It’s still a massive outlier in lockdown theory, the earliest lockdown in Europe IIRC but even when all is said and done may be one of the worst very affected countries in Europe per capita. The excess death figures that the FT came up with suggest that could be the case.

https://www.ft.com/content/6bd88b7d-3386-4543-b2e9-0d5c6fac846c

Sweden is the other obvious outlier but Singapore should be considered too because they didn't close schools either, which I think will be the biggest single social harm from lockdown.
 
Youve totally misunderstood what he was saying

No I was not. Linking the U.K. response to Brexit was bollocks. And yes please overlook as he did the sheer impracticality of any country tracking and tracing millions of citizens returning from holiday or enforcing self isolation on them.
 
No I was not. Linking the U.K. response to Brexit was bollocks. And yes please overlook as he did the sheer impracticality of any country tracking and tracing millions of citizens returning from holiday or enforcing self isolation on them.
Didn't South Korea give a blueprint for how to do exactly that?
 
Close airports, land borders and sea borders to everyone else apart from essential supply chains. There was no need for Heathrow just letting thousands in every day (can’t be all people returning from short holidays!), for weeks, without ANY checks. Taking control of borders? Literally no control!

The other thing is the US travel ban >

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-51883728 (happened first)

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-51891662 (then 2 days later)

Effectively, for 48 hours, UK airports became a breeding ground for Covid. Anyone travelling from anywhere else in Europe wanting to get to the US had to do so via a UK airport. I was gobsmacked at the time that somebody didn't step in and stop this from happening. It's little wonder that London cases took off like they did with workers from these airports then traveling on packed public transport in the following weeks.
 
No I was not. Linking the U.K. response to Brexit was bollocks. And yes please overlook as he did the sheer impracticality of any country tracking and tracing millions of citizens returning from holiday or enforcing self isolation on them.
Other countries did it
 
I remember the posts on here regarding it, it's almost as if they were getting off on breaking the news to us.

Spoiler for you mate.....

They were.

There's a portion of the UK that want us to remain in lockdown for rational concern and educated doubts. There's a few extremely knowledgeable and balanced guys posting on here that fall under that category.

However, in the UK we've also got Some paranoid basket cases and some are likely to be loners who finally feel 'normal' for the first time in their lives.

Both parties are dreading lockdown ending and are hoping it is prolonged over and over again.
 
No I was not. Linking the U.K. response to Brexit was bollocks. And yes please overlook as he did the sheer impracticality of any country tracking and tracing millions of citizens returning from holiday or enforcing self isolation on them.
You’ve entirely missed the point because you jump on the phrase brexit.

Point - campaigned on controlling borders - first opportunity to really control borders and they didn’t. They let thousands flow through the airports every day even as the numbers were going crazy in Italy and Spain
 
The other thing is the US travel ban >

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-51883728 (happened first)

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-51891662 (then 2 days later)

Effectively, for 48 hours, UK airports became a breeding ground for Covid. Anyone travelling from anywhere else in Europe wanting to get to the US had to do so via a UK airport. I was gobsmacked at the time that somebody didn't step in and stop this from happening. It's little wonder that London cases took off like they did with workers from these airports then traveling on packed public transport in the following weeks.
I remember looking at the TV in disbelief when Trump announced that he was stopping travel from all of Europe, except the UK... as if somehow the UK were immune to this pandemic or something because they speak English or something (I'm spitballing for a reason for doing this here)
 
overlook as he did the sheer impracticality of any country tracking and tracing millions of citizens returning from holiday or enforcing self isolation on them.

That’s alright then let’s not do it because it’s too hard
 
The other thing is the US travel ban >

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-51883728 (happened first)

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-51891662 (then 2 days later)

Effectively, for 48 hours, UK airports became a breeding ground for Covid. Anyone travelling from anywhere else in Europe wanting to get to the US had to do so via a UK airport. I was gobsmacked at the time that somebody didn't step in and stop this from happening. It's little wonder that London cases took off like they did with workers from these airports then traveling on packed public transport in the following weeks.

Interesting. It’s estimated that between 3 and 5 million Londoners use TFL too. The other issue to is how central London is to everything England. People commute there for work from all corners of the country.
 
Last edited:
The other thing is the US travel ban >

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-51883728 (happened first)

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-51891662 (then 2 days later)

Effectively, for 48 hours, UK airports became a breeding ground for Covid. Anyone travelling from anywhere else in Europe wanting to get to the US had to do so via a UK airport. I was gobsmacked at the time that somebody didn't step in and stop this from happening. It's little wonder that London cases took off like they did with workers from these airports then traveling on packed public transport in the following weeks.

Exactly, it was lunacy then and with hindsight it’s still lunacy
 
The problem with easing the lockdown is that people in this country are far too thick and far too arrogant to actually follow the rules of social distancing. The Government's lack of clarity at the time didn't help, but to be frank, I don't think it would have made a blind bit of difference in any case.

In the event of an easing of the lockdown, we'll likely see the crowds come out again and people thinking it's a case of being back to normal, and the rate of infections will shoot up. The people in Germany are seemingly following the social distancing rules, but it hasn't stopped the R0 to rise, even if it was a little. What hope have we here, where people had to be forced to not go out even though days earlier the government was pleading with everyone to stay in?

Tbh, even this situation isn't a full-scale lockdown, and we have people going on like their martyrs. Get a fecking grip, ffs. Do what is needed to be done, and we'll come out of this. There will likely need to be an easing up, but it won't be a case of us being back to normal until a vaccine comes up. A lot of these restrictions will be in place for the foreseeable.
 
You’ve entirely missed the point because you jump on the phrase brexit.

Point - campaigned on controlling borders - first opportunity to really control borders and they didn’t. They let thousands flow through the airports every day even as the numbers were going crazy in Italy and Spain
Honestly, these recent posts have been some of the most cringeworthy in the 800 pages so far. Can you just think of some of the implications of what you are suggesting and generate sustainable solutions for the inevitable wide-scale problems you would create? Even the Conservatives are at least far more aware of how interconnected the modern world is – and with great benefits for the vast majority.

Golden Blunder could well be a nickname for Trump and that’s exactly who you are channelling here.