Regulus Arcturus Black
Full Member
Your last sentence doesn’t really make sense to me. I’m not talking about a “win” for anything based on Sweden’s experience. I’m just saying you can’t put nursing home infections/fatalities to one side, when assessing the overall effectiveness of a government’s strategy. Which you seem to be keen to do here. If anything, nursing home residents are the canary in the coal mine.
Arruda was though, not you.
And I’m not putting them aside, they are an extremely important part of the figures of course And some thing that needs to be considered a mass failure in the countries they get hit hardest there.
Something that is not surprising and what is completely forgotten here when people try to discuss Sweden strategy is that Gothenburg which has a population similar to Dublin Lisbon Copenhagen Oslo has a very low death rate.
Why is that the case if the Swedish strategy is so wrong? Is it not just the case that more populated cities like Stockholm end up more fecked because they were already on the ”pretty fecked” path once Italy kicked off.
Or can anyone explain to me why Gothenburg, a city of 590,000 has had it so well considering Sweden’s non lockdown strategy is so poor?