SARS CoV-2 coronavirus / Covid-19 (No tin foil hat silliness please)

The way i see it. It's better than none. Just dont take it as 100 percent safe.

But you know letting commoners with common sense is never gonna work.
I’m no scientist and really don’t know if this right. But with viral load being possibly a case, would wearing a mask that you’ve contaminated accidentally with covid19 increase the viral load if you’re just walking around with it Stuck to the front of your face constantly breathing it in?
 
A french professor talked about this months ago now and slowly he's turning heads in France after being considered as a mad man at first.
@JPRouve I just watched on LCI a doctor say that we should consider the reluctance of many of doctors have of using plaquenil+azythromicine as caused by the presure they are put under big labs who are racing for a vaccine. Imaginine curing most covid 19 cases with cheap medicine, I'm sure it would piss off some greedy cnuts at the helm of certain companies

Not really. The second french clinical test independent from Raoult has shown that most patients don't react to plaquenil+azythromycin and a chinese clinical trial goes in the same direction. Also the argument doesn't actually work when Sanofi, the ones owning plaquenil, increased the production of plaquenil, if anything we should look at the links between Raoult and Sanofi. Angers CHU started a new clinical trial that is supposed to be less amateurish and much larger with 1300 patients. Below you have a researcher from the CNRS explaining where the problem lies with Raoult and his experiment, basically he botched everything.

 
A french professor talked about this months ago now and slowly he's turning heads in France after being considered as a mad man at first.
@JPRouve I just watched on LCI a doctor say that we should consider the reluctance of many of doctors have of using plaquenil+azythromicine as caused by the presure they are put under big labs who are racing for a vaccine. Imaginine curing most covid 19 cases with cheap medicine, I'm sure it would piss off some greedy cnuts at the helm of certain companies

I'm sorry but if there was an evidence-based way of treating this it would be given. We are considering everything. All options are being carefully considered. I haven't heard a single one of my colleagues worried about pharmaceutical companies or "pressure" of any sort. Heck I'd give homeopathy if it meant curing COVID-19.
Doctors are independently minded individuals. And we are science based, but we need to consider if giving medications that can potentiate cardiac abnormalities and liver derangement is worth giving based on a small poorly designed study with no useful end points with other studies showing conflicting data.
Plural of anecdote is not data.
 
Not really. The second french clinical test independent from Raoult has shown that most patients don't react to plaquenil+azythromycin and a chinese clinical trial goes in the same direction. Also the argument doesn't actually work when Sanofi, the ones owning plaquenil, increased the production of plaquenil, if anything we should look at the links between Raoult and Sanofi. Angers CHU started a new clinical trial that is supposed to be less amateurish and much larger with 1300 patients. Below you have a researcher from the CNRS explaining where the problem lies with Raoult and his experiment, basically he botched everything.



Second clinical trial was also not a random test as well. There has been few other test were subjects were immunocompromised and they concluded it doesn't work. It seems like there is an eagerness to prove it doesn't work. French doctors published another test in which they claimed it cured 78/80 patients and recovery time was 6 days which is way less than what it is now. This was also not randomised.

There is a reason why this has been included in WHO trial. We should wait for their result. India, which is the world largest producer, have recommended it for high risk category people only for now.
 
I’m no scientist and really don’t know if this right. But with viral load being possibly a case, would wearing a mask that you’ve contaminated accidentally with covid19 increase the viral load if you’re just walking around with it Stuck to the front of your face constantly breathing it in?

Neither am I, it's just common sense that if cough = droplets, than any sort of barrier will help.

Plus, if you're a covid positif the mask isn't mean to help you, it's mean to help the others.

It's like a mouth gag, it's meant to stop you, not shielding you from others. You're the assumed monster, not the victims.
 

Anti-parasitics have never shown any potential as anti-virals in any significant "in vivo" studies that I know. Neurotoxicity is also a concern at higher doses I'd imagine for it do have the kind of antiviral effects seen in the lab.
I wouldn't personally be excited about its potential as a candidate but who knows how it'll do in human trials, right now we'd take anything.
 
Update in Ireland:

The majority of patients admitted to intensive care units to be treated for Covid-19 are aged under 65.

The latest figures from the Health Protection Surveillance Centre show that of 148 patients admitted to ICU, just 59 of them were over 65, accounting for almost 40%, while the remaining 60% were under 65.
 
Second clinical trial was also not a random test as well. There has been few other test were subjects were immunocompromised and they concluded it doesn't work. It seems like there is an eagerness to prove it doesn't work. French doctors published another test in which they claimed it cured 78/80 patients and recovery time was 6 days which is way less than what it is now. This was also not randomised.

There is a reason why this has been included in WHO trial. We should wait for their result. India, which is the world largest producer, have recommended it for high risk category people only for now.

The second trial that you are talking about is from the same doctor who claimed that 65/80 had positive results, none of his work is reliable. There is an actual clinical trial that has been started in Angers including 1300 patients though, we will have a better idea about plaquenil when we have those results.
 
Anti-parasitics have never shown any potential as anti-virals in any significant "in vivo" studies that I know. Neurotoxicity is also a concern at higher doses I'd imagine for it do have the kind of antiviral effects seen in the lab.
I wouldn't personally be excited about its potential as a candidate but who knows how it'll do in human trials, right now we'd take anything.
Couldn't agree more. I am desperate for a sight of good news. Spending unhealthy hours on various sites learning about various drugs and virus and I am an engineer. Hopefully we find something that works.
 
Couldn't agree more. I am desperate for a sight of good news. Spending unhealthy hours on various sites learning about various drugs and virus and I am an engineer. Hopefully we find something that works.

The silver lining is that our earth seems to be healing at a very magical pace, 1-2 months of us slowing down really gets our earth going. Been reading alot of good stuffs happening on that front, maybe that'll cheer you up abit
 
The silver lining is that our earth seems to be healing at a very magical pace, 1-2 months of us slowing down really gets our earth going. Been reading alot of good stuffs happening on that front, maybe that'll cheer you up abit
It did. Saw a picture in which Himalayas were visible from one city in North India which wasn't possible earlier and it looks stunning. But I want to be able to go there and see it myself :).
 
The silver lining is that our earth seems to be healing at a very magical pace, 1-2 months of us slowing down really gets our earth going. Been reading alot of good stuffs happening on that front, maybe that'll cheer you up abit

We will feck it up again really quickly when given the chance.
 
Couldn't agree more. I am desperate for a sight of good news. Spending unhealthy hours on various sites learning about various drugs and virus and I am an engineer. Hopefully we find something that works.

For what its worth I'm sure we will. It's the lives lost and impact that has on families until that point that is what is so demoralising

But we'll get onto the right combination that'll lower mortality rate for our inpatient cohort, I don't think it'll be existing medications. But I think the usual sort of things that make delay vaccine going into bypass I think (hope) will be bypassed, with a few risks, but worth taking.

Right now I think trials are fine. Whether it be hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, BCG, vitamin D etc but its important to highlight that we know what does work, that's preventing people getting sick in the first place.

Healthcare worker PPE, social isolation, social distancing, forensic contact tracing and testing, all of which our government has screwed up amounting to clinical and borderline criminal negligence in my opinion. Had they taken the relevant steps and not listened to behavioural psychologists or politics or whatever their initial strategy was we would have trended more towards a flattened curve earlier.
 
Thats a little scary, but also good news if it means Irland been able to keep the virus away from the elders.
Unfortunately that’s not the case. There has been clusters of the virus in about 13 nursing homes around the country.
 
Unfortunately that’s not the case. There has been clusters of the virus in about 13 nursing homes around the country.
Thats sucks man. Same here in Sweden.
This whole situation is horrible.
I almost feel nothing anymore when i read things like ”1000 people dead in 24 hours” And i scare myself a little when the only comfort i can come up with is that most of them was on the last page anyway. Its a dangerous though and feeling to feel so numb to people dying.
 
Update in Ireland:

Not so surprising given we’ve the youngest population in Europe (or is it just Western Europe?). We’re at the opposite end of the scale from Italy in those terms.
 
There are news that Turkey blocked a cargo plane headed for Spain, which stopped there, with ventilators and protective material (already paid for).
 
I'm bit skeptical of pharmacy company making super normal profit out of the corona vaccine, whoever comes out with it first.

You'd imagine ANY government in the world would force them to release the formula for mass production.The amount of pressure from worldwide community would be too huge if certain pharmaceutical company choose to be exclusive with it, there will be riots on the streets if those medicines are only for the rich.

Right now people are somewhat accepting that shit happens, imagine if there's people dying and there lies the medicine but only if you can afford it. You can be sure riots and looting will happen.
J&J already announced they won't be making any profit from a potential vaccine.
 
It did. Saw a picture in which Himalayas were visible from one city in North India which wasn't possible earlier and it looks stunning. But I want to be able to go there and see it myself :).
Here in Azores, São Miguel island has been seen from Terceira island several times in the last few days. This was a rare event that happened every few years.
 
I dont think its the same med as the french doctor said. This one is different although parasite medicine only.

I also have this suspicion about pharam companies using their lobby to delay the trial. Although now since Trump has mentioned it, maybe that mad b**tard end up doing one good thing of finding whether it works or not

Honestly he's such a loose cannon that he'll even screw up big pharma companies so he can tweet he saved the world on his own. And he may actually be right this time. For all the wrong reasons obviously.

Trump is not the hero I want in the world right now. But he's the hero I need.
 
I'm sorry but if there was an evidence-based way of treating this it would be given. We are considering everything. All options are being carefully considered. I haven't heard a single one of my colleagues worried about pharmaceutical companies or "pressure" of any sort. Heck I'd give homeopathy if it meant curing COVID-19.
Doctors are independently minded individuals. And we are science based, but we need to consider if giving medications that can potentiate cardiac abnormalities and liver derangement is worth giving based on a small poorly designed study with no useful end points with other studies showing conflicting data.
Plural of anecdote is not data.

What do you make of this British mob testing Siltuximab (aka Sylvant) in Italy? Seems like in principle in might help? It binds to IL-6 cytokines and is hoped to therefore reduce lung inflamation.
 
What do you make of this British mob testing Siltuximab in Italy? Seems like in principle in might help? It binds to IL-6 cytokines and is hoped to therefore reduce lung inflamation.

I'm glad talk is now turning towards an immediate treatment of the symptoms (rather than or including vaccine discussions). Worth a thread of its own or just keep it in here?

I've been trying to read as many articles daily on progress of potential cures (there are quite a few). But speed is of the essence as human trials take time and this is where Trump ironically may tell Fauci to cut the crap and go with the best results before America's death rate worsens in the red states (screw NY and California). There are some large human trials by WHO for which an update is imminent in mid-late April for efficacy.
 
What do you make of this British mob testing Siltuximab in Italy? Seems like in principle in might help? It binds to IL-6 cytokines and is hoped to therefore reduce lung inflamation.

Biologics should make in theory for very effective agents

The aetiology of the most severe manifestation of COVID19 is ARDS which is underpinned by cytokine storm so agents targeting that should definitely be considered in reducing mortality and morbidity

https://www.cancernetwork.com/news/...clinical-trial-tocilizumab-covid-19-pneumonia
Tocilizumab is another good shout
 
There are news that Turkey blocked a cargo plane headed for Spain, which stopped there, with ventilators and protective material (already paid for).

Not sure if it's already been posted but Trump is at it too, blocking shipments of PPE to Germany. We have to be careful a war doesnt come out of all this.
 
There are news that Turkey blocked a cargo plane headed for Spain, which stopped there, with ventilators and protective material (already paid for).

A while ago it was revealed that Sweden was holding truckloads of protective equipment at the border with Norway for days, over some EU directive about exporting such equipment in these times. It was eventually sorted out though, at least temporarily.
 


This NHK World report has been doing the rounds on Whatsapp.


Been posted earlier. The experiment shows reasonable information. The video has some factual errors and the simulation should be taken with a pinch of salt, until you know how they carried out the simulation.
 
Been posted earlier. The experiment shows reasonable information. The video has some factual errors and the simulation should be taken with a pinch of salt, until you know how they carried out the simulation.


It also doesn't show what happens when people cough into tissues or their hands. I'd like to see how much both things reduce the droplets in the air.
 
@Enigma_87 was absolutely spot on earlier in this thread about masks. He said exactly what I was told from someone in the NHS.
 

The paper is a reasonable start but doesn't provide anything definitive. For example, it says the virus survives* in droplets for the duration of the experiment. That only gives a lower limit for its surviability. At least when I read it, they didn't seem to give the proper material names, nor the surface conditions. The former is important because you can have different grades of stainless steel and obviously you can get a variety of different plastic. The fact the virus has different survival rates on different surfaces suggests surface conditions are important. Yet they've not provided us with any information about the characteristics of these surfaces. At least in droplet impact studies, you normally expect a description of the surface such as its surface roughness, whether it is wet, heated etc. So its a good start, but unfortunately the media have also blown the paper out of proportion.

*Something I would like to know about that paper is what does it actually mean by virus stability and survivability and what actually influences those factors? Is it the rate at which liquid from the surface is evapourated or something else? I don't understand this part.
 
Last edited:
Not sure if it's already been posted but Trump is at it too, blocking shipments of PPE to Germany. We have to be careful a war doesnt come out of all this.
Seems its widespread unfortunately . i posted a story earlier of france blocking shipments to us as early as march 3rd . America in turn have hi jacked various deliveries to different countries . Hope this can be stamped out but it seems as though its like the wild west out there in regards to how countries ( and companies for that matter ) are acting . As i mentioned earlier i hope this doesnt happen once a vaccine is found
 
Seems its widespread unfortunately . i posted a story earlier of france blocking shipments to us as early as march 3rd . America in turn have hi jacked various deliveries to different countries . Hope this can be stamped out but it seems as though its like the wild west out there in regards to how countries ( and companies for that matter ) are acting . As i mentioned earlier i hope this doesnt happen once a vaccine is found

From what others have said, any vaccine is a long way off, so I wouldn't worry about it just yet!