17 Van der Gouw
biffa bin
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2010
- Messages
- 6,515
Is there an updated chart which shows the different countries incidence curve?
Hmm, maybe Ireland are closer to implementing similar measures than I thought.
UK is still ahead of the curve. Lockdown at 6000 cases is 30% earlier than the worst hit countries.
I wouldn't worry too much about the details, here it took a few days for people to get used to the lockdown and for the government to clarify everything. It wont really take effect until about Thursday or Friday.
Fixed.Yeah because at times like this .Where people are being confined to their homes ,there is nothing more essential than a pair of Diadora's.
What to do.
Fly back with BA on next few weeks for £250 direct to london from Lima?
Or wait it out in Peru who have a curfew in place and locked down for last week or so but this country would be back in the stone age if 9 million people get hungry in a few months time.
I can see the benefit of staying here for now but I risk not being able to fly in a few months if things turn bad here.
It's a low bar tbf.Today I learned McDonald's cares more for the well being of its staff than Sports Direct.
Hmm, maybe Ireland are closer to implementing similar measures than I thought.
Surely it’s not up to owners of business to “declare” whether their businesses are essential or not?
Is it? I thought Italy started there lockdown at 7000 cases?
So Ashley is in direct contravention of that then.
Nationwide shutdown was announced on the night we hit 10,000 cases.
Regional Lombardy lockdown was at 7000.
I think it's pretty clear :
"Travelling to and from work, but only where this absolutely cannot be done from home."
That basically means if your employer thinks you can't work from home (yet).
Ireland behind the UK on this one it seems.
Easiest way to avoid bulk buying would be to add Levy tax if the third item of the same thing is scanned.Not serve in them but control how many people are allowed in (and potentially enforce any limits to stop panic buying) and ensuring the people outside observe social distancing
Why not do it now though? Save lives and all that..Well, yes and no. We're later introducing "lockdown" but we're also in a rather different place to the UK in terms of our strategy in dealing with the virus. It's not exactly a like for like comparison.
It doesn't mean that. It means this "If the job you do absolutely cannot be done from home then you can travel to your workplace to do that job"
Its only difficult to understand if you want it to be i'nit
https://www.asthma.org.uk/advice/triggers/coronavirus-covid-19/Thanks, have checked the link but can't find anything about when Asthma is classified as 'vulnerable' etc.
In reality, anyone with chronic Asthma should certainly be in that category... I find it slightly baffling if that's not the case.
Youre looking too far forward. Im expecting a test to be widely available that allows you to know if you have contracted it so you arent a risk anymore and can work again. It has to happen, tok many people will be self isolating for no reason.Something we will never be able to quantify but so many people will die indirectly because of this chaos. This must be enormously stressful for people who have to pay off their mortgage but are left without income for what could easily extend to 8-10 months, we are all aware of the impact of stress on health. I just don’t see what’s viable exit strategy from these lockdowns. Cases will keep piling up and surely no government will lift restrictions with 100+ daily cases still present. I just don’t see how this ends.
Do you work for Sports Direct by any chance?Just got told I'm expected at the office tomorrow. Great.
Let me guess...you're not a Tory. Am I right?
I'd love to respo
And the relevance of this to a guy who lives in Humberside is?
That's how I read it too. The idea that the work itself has to be essential is just made up. As with 'we're in lockdown', no we aren't, that's made up too, there are multiple reasons why people can leave the house, we are not in lockdown.I think it's pretty clear :
"Travelling to and from work, but only where this absolutely cannot be done from home."
That basically means if your employer thinks you can't work from home (yet).
Why not do it now though? Save lives and all that..
That's been the criticism aimed at the government here.
I think you both agree with each other, you've just worded it differenty.It doesn't mean that. It means this "If the job you do absolutely cannot be done from home then you can travel to your workplace to do that job"
Its only difficult to understand if you want it to be i'nit
But aren't most of Italy's cases concentrated in Lombardy?
And surely following Italy's example is a dreadful, dreadful idea. Because they themselves are struggling to cope, and though the numbers are turning around the next weeks are still going to get worse for them? And from everything I've read, the NHS' capacity for critical care is less than Italy's?
It will mean in coming days you'll only go to work if it's essential. I'm pretty certain about that. Doesn't matter if you can work from home or not.
That is very optimistic. I don’t really see a chance of restrictions being lifted before September/October but maybe I’m too pessimistic too.Youre looking too far forward. Im expecting a test to be widely available that allows you to know if you have contracted it so you arent a risk anymore and can work again. It has to happen, tok many people will be self isolating for no reason.
If it is this widespread then the econony can get kickstarted again in 3 months. We just need a chance to regroup.
And he just asked one of the top medical officials in the country “when will the mean media that don’t like me be allowed back in the room?”Trump briefing:
'Donald Trump said that very soon “we’re going to be opening up our country”.
Asked by a reporter if that meant “weeks or months,” Trump said, “I’m not looking at months, I can tell you right now.”
“People get tremendous anxiety and depression and you have suicide over things like this, when you have a terrible economy, you have death, definitely would be in far greater numbers than we’re talking about with regard to the virus,” Trump said. “We have a double obligation. We have a great country, there’s no country like it in the world, and there’s no economy like it in the world.”'
(Guardian)
It doesn't mean that. It means this "If the job you do absolutely cannot be done from home then you can travel to your workplace to do that job"
Its only difficult to understand if you want it to be i'nit
No, the essential work bit is made up, at least for the moment. You can go to work if it's work that you can't do from home. Unless it's specifically in one of the barred groups, like pubs, clubs and so on.No idea if I'm supposed to go into work now or not.
If its essential, meaning key workers then we should have been put on the list and everyone should know that they are expected to keep working. Like British Gas for example.
If that isn't true IE you haven't been informed you are expected to work on, you should stay at home.
Is that correct?