SARS CoV-2 coronavirus / Covid-19 (No tin foil hat silliness please)

I know the plan one Health Trust in NI is putting into place to deal with what they're projecting to happen. Let's just say it's grim.
 
I am hardly saying any bullshit. It is the most detailed study we have had so far, which forecasts 2.1m Americans dying if we only mitigate the problem, and 4m if we do nothing and leave it as the flu. Interpolate the numbers for the world, and you get what I am saying.
Over what timescale?
 
Exactly. I've been mentioning this to friends for a week or two, people losing their mind over 2000 cases or so in the UK. I would imagine that number is closer to 100,000, it's just not causing them any problems. Re-iterates the need for social distancing and protecting those that are vulnerable.

Some people in here and others on Facebook who can't tear themselves away from their precious pint in the local should take heed. It's not all about you.

Isn't this a really good thing?

Serious cases that end up in hospital are being tested, but if there's a substantial number of people who have got it/have it who simply have slipped under the radar (an absolute certainty in the UK at least) then does it not suggest that the virus is significantly less deadly than feared?
 
I think they modeled that doing nothing (treating it like the flu) would result in 2.2 million deaths rising to nearly 4 million if we really did feck all. Some bloke then extrapolated this to the worlds population and came up with 90 million deaths. The maths is correct but it wasn't meant to be a prediction of what will happen, just of what could happen if we did nothing. And we are doing things.

Still very fecking scary mind.
I said that left alone will reach those numbers. Yes, their numbers for UK and US very much matched, so you can extrapolate for the entire world (with some degree).

Obviously we are doing something, but it is still scary. For example, mitigation only reduced the number of deaths at a quarter (so 1m in US, 260k in UK), and suppression with then total removal of restriction was the same as doing nothing.

The current strategy most states are doing lowers it to a few thousands for US/UK (I think that is extremely optimistic as we see from Italy, so it is gonna be few tens of thousands), but that requires a lot of restrictions to stay in place until the vaccine comes.
 
I think they modeled that doing nothing (treating it like the flu) would result in 2.2 million deaths rising to nearly 4 million if we really did feck all. Some bloke then extrapolated this to the worlds population and came up with 90 million deaths. The maths is correct but it wasn't meant to be a prediction of what will happen, just of what could happen if we did nothing. And we are doing things.

Still very fecking scary mind.

Wasn't that also them just extrapolating the mortality rates to apply to the global population? Large portions of the world won't have access to anything like the resources and treatment available to the richest parts of the world.

Or am I missing something?
 
I said that left alone will reach those numbers. Yes, their numbers for UK and US very much matched, so you can extrapolate for the entire world (with some degree).

Obviously we are doing something, but it is still scary. For example, mitigation only reduced the number of deaths at a quarter (so 1m in US, 260k in UK), and suppression with then total removal of restriction was the same as doing nothing.

The current strategy most states are doing lowers it to a few thousands for US/UK (I think that is extremely optimistic as we see from Italy, so it is gonna be few tens of thousands), but that requires a lot of restrictions to stay in place until the vaccine comes.

I read a summary of the Imperial report on Twitter. I recall there being 3 scenarios - doing nothing, mitigation, and outright surpression.

I'm not sure which category the United Kingdom comes under - (mitigation I guess?) - because we only have government advice and no complete ban on leaving the home. People are still going to bars/cafes/restaurants.
 
I read a summary of the Imperial report on Twitter. I recall there being 3 scenarios - doing nothing, mitigation, and outright surpression.

I'm not sure which category the United Kingdom comes under - (mitigation I guess?) - because we only have government advice and no complete ban on leaving the home. People are still going to bars/cafes/restaurants.
They were supposed to do mitigation (herd immunity) but when the study was completed the number of deaths was too high to accept it, so switched to suppression. Supression does not necessarily mean full lockdown.
 
Wasn't that also them just extrapolating the mortality rates to apply to the global population? Large portions of the world won't have access to anything like the resources and treatment available to the richest parts of the world.

Or am I missing something?

90 million is extrapolating the very worst cases in the US to the rest of the world. That worst case won't happen because steps are already well above the level of treating it like the flu.

Still scary but it almost certainly won't be that bad - will almost certainly involve significant deaths of course.
 
I am hardly saying any bullshit. It is the most detailed study we have had so far, which forecasts 2.1m Americans dying if we only mitigate the problem, and 4m if we do nothing and leave it as the flu. Interpolate the numbers for the world, and you get what I am saying.

It also is conservative in many cases, using a significantly lower fatality rate than the one given from WHO. It is also precisely the study that the UK government is using to make their policy (thus while they gave up on herd immunity).

The silliness was more from 'this is just the flu' brigade who thankfully seem to have disappeared in the last week.

I dunno, I’ve kept an eye on this thread and to be honest I think you’re taking too much in and unleashing it. Like I get it’s bad but anytime I see a comment that I think “steady on” it inevitably comes from you. I get you’re trying to be informative but I can’t imagine constantly looking up and reading statistics about how many dead people there is and there’s gonna be is healthy. I mean just today you’ve killed off football as an entire sport and then killed off 90 million people. Just chill....
 
Interesting.

A couple of things from my point of view:

1. They've stated R0 to be 2.4. It's not actually known what the COVID R0 number is and this can fall with measures that are put in place. It has been estimated it may be as low as 1.5, but it's obviously a fairly significant variable.

Overall, our results suggest that population-wide social distancing applied to the population as a whole would have the largest impact; and in combination with other interventions – notably home isolation of cases and school and university closure – has the potential to suppress transmission below the threshold of R=1 required to rapidly reduce case incidence

2. The numbers you've quoted correlate to doing nothing, as I've quoted above, the measures we've put in place now may have the biggest impact. I'm not refuting the fact that millions could die if we did nothing, but the fact is that we are doing something, therefore statements such as '2.2m could die' are unhelpful in the long run as it doesn't correlate with the current scenario.
 
Good thread from a Virologist about the future Covid vaccine

 
Isn't this a really good thing?

Serious cases that end up in hospital are being tested, but if there's a substantial number of people who have got it/have it who simply have slipped under the radar (an absolute certainty in the UK at least) then does it not suggest that the virus is significantly less deadly than feared?
That is certainly a way of looking at it, yes. Which is why I've always taken the death rate with a pinch of salt. Personally, as a person who as asthma and often gets pretty wheezy with seasonal flu-like infections I'm a bit uneasy.

Have I had it and been ok? Maybe. Have I not had it? Maybe. I'll be on higher alert/vigilant until I get my vaccine. I just feel if I let my guard down it could get me in some bother. Statistics are on my side, however, being 30, but...you know...
 
To me, that’s the only thing that explains the death rate in Germany. They’re considering the death as from a pre-existing condition rather than from the virus that exacerbated it.
They have denied that explicitly.
My sister works in a hospital near Cologne. So far they are coping well, they still have enough capacity to deal with the Corona patients.

day 10 of isolation and I’m spiraling truth be told. Moved to this country ten months ago so don’t have a lot of close friends here, so already had a bit of loneliness kicking in.
I have ps4/Netflix/books/work from home. But I’m crumbling here. I won’t go out with friends and put others at risk - following the gov advice here, but I’m spiraling
Which country?
 
Pit stop.



Putting this here if anyone is nearly burnt out from this macabre thread. I sometimes just watch this for 10-15 minutes, cheers me right up, heading over Spain/northern Africa currently going into daylight.
 
  • Like
Reactions: oneniltothearsenal
It's not 2). We are basically not testing at all.

Our 3 year old daughter with 39,3 fever and dry cough was not able to get tested - and we live in the middle of Cologne, one of the hardest hit cities in Germany.


I personally think our gov is hiding stuff.

The normal numbers show that we test a lot.

Germany tested 100,000 people last week, 35,000 the week before. They might not have tested everybody that wanted a test... and especially in the first weeks when test kits were more difficult to get.

Small kids with usual cold signs and normal fever for sure are not the first to get tested...

There is enough understandable reasons why we are not on Italy's ot Spain's track.
 
I mean... yeah. They’re not gonna say “ahhhh ya got me!” if somebody asks.
Yeah... but this is not China. There would be leaks and a huge public outrage. And, it would be difficult to orchestrate because it‘s not controlled by a central structure. Every county reports the numbers independently.
 
To me, that’s the only thing that explains the death rate in Germany. They’re considering the death as from a pre-existing condition rather than from the virus that exacerbated it.

In the death cases that I know more of (regional newspapers) that was just not the case. And despite some users who like conspiracy theories that does just not match to the usual German overly correct prussian character.

In Germany the first cases from January were pretty well tracked. The second wave came with travellers, from skiing hotspots in Austria etc. Mainly with young people!



ES1wYWLWsAMvU57


That was after the first 648 cases about ten days ago. If you take some days between discovery and death...

All of e.g. Bavarias 15 or 18 death cases were between 67 and 99.

I actually expect Germany to cope better with the virus then most of the other countries because of the organisation, social structure, discpline and health system.

And yes, there is always some people that do not catch the seriousness of the situation.
 
Last edited:
In the death cases that I know more of (regional newspapers) that was just not the case. And despite some users who like conspiracy theories that does just not match to the usual German overly correct prussian character.

In Germany the first cases from January were pretty well tracked. The second wave came with travellers, from skiing hotspots in Austria etc. Mainly with young people!



ES1wYWLWsAMvU57


That was after the first 648 cases about ten days ago. If you take some days between discovery and death...

All of e.g. Bavarias 15 or 18 death cases were between 67 and 99.

I actually expect Germany to cope better with the virus then most of the other countries because of the organisation, social structure, discpline and health system.

And yes, there is always some people that do not catch the seriousness of the situation.
If anything, that chart indicates you test a lot more than Italy so your ratios should be more accurate.

Have a similar issue here with people constantly lambasting the government for having almost the same number of cases as Argentina despite their population being 13 times ours. They overlook Argentina has 2 deaths already while we have none and our ICUs are empty.
 
In a lighter side, we should probably arrange more forum games on redcafe since there would be many people on lockdowns.

Wolves? Any other forum games that's interesting? Perhaps a gaming session?
Werewolf is far too apt. Villagers are blind as bats, have no clue what's going on and who is evil (infected) as they keep themselves hidden (asymptomatic).

Everyone banging on about collaborating and fighting for the greater good despite (again) not having the faintest idea how to go about it.

There's a chap running around with a limited stock of test kits trying to hit the jackpot with his one daily seer check.

Worst of all, most players end up dead.
 
Werewolf is far too apt. Villagers are blind as bats, have no clue what's going on and who is evil (infected) as they keep themselves hidden (asymptomatic).

Everyone banging on about collaborating and fighting for the greater good despite (again) not having the faintest idea how to go about it.

There's a chap running around with a limited stock of test kits trying to hit the jackpot with his one daily seer check.

Worst of all, most players end up dead.
So a covid themed game then? :lol:
 
Werewolf is far too apt. Villagers are blind as bats, have no clue what's going on and who is evil (infected) as they keep themselves hidden (asymptomatic).

Everyone banging on about collaborating and fighting for the greater good despite (again) not having the faintest idea how to go about it.

There's a chap running around with a limited stock of test kits trying to hit the jackpot with his one daily seer check.

Worst of all, most players end up dead.

hats off!
 
Trump pushes FDA limits in rush for coronavirus medicines

Link to story here.

President Donald Trump is pushing the Food and Drug Administration to speed up approval of antiviral therapies that could combat the coronavirus, despite warnings that untested treatments could harm Americans infected with COVID-19

I can't decide how I feel about this, apprehensive but excited.

An interesting primer, quite technical though:

 
Yeah that they were unprepared, despite warnings and that now not nearly enough tests and labarotory capacity are available to do tests.
And with that the german government is more or less the same than most western democratic governments.

But the government is a mirror of its own population and society. We all were unprepared and couldn't imagine something like that. If the government had done something like travel restrictions half of the population and businesses would have gone to court, to claim their right to do business in China and to do skiing in Italy and Austria.
That is one of the main reasons why I think many asian societies were better prepared. They remebered the fear they had of SARS and MERS. For us (including me) that was something that was happening at the other end of the world.
The governments (and us) should have known better, but we didn't.
Harsh as it sounds, every society gets the politicians it deserves.

As a Singaporean, I would say the SARs experience was crucial. After SARs, the government developed a system called DORSCON and laid out plans and strategies to handle epidemics. That way, we don't need waste time on the drawing board whenever something happens. Government agencies also have drills every now ans then, that helped improve our readiness.

The government also set aside funds to build our infrastructure. By a great stroke of luck, a new center for communicable diseases that can house infected patients was just opened months before the outbreak, and immediately put to good use.

At the societal level, the memory of SARS is still fresh and everyone knows the seriousness of an outbreak.
 
Very stressful day at the house with the missus being a teacher.

She had a briefing from the head that all teachers are to use Microsoft Teams to run virtual classes (kids already abusing this, calling teachers 24/7), lesson work to be provided to all as they normally would be, just on an online format, plus a week of supervising those kids still going in. Her week just so happens to be the half term week so the immediate question is, does she get the week back in lieu?

Worst is that friends who teach at other schools have been given NO teaching commitments! Simply attendance at the school for 1 day each week!

A complete lack of national organisation on this. I’ve pushed her to go to the union rep today as it surely isn’t right that members of the same unions would have such vastly contrasting workload expectations from their schools.
 
In the death cases that I know more of (regional newspapers) that was just not the case. And despite some users who like conspiracy theories that does just not match to the usual German overly correct prussian character.

In Germany the first cases from January were pretty well tracked. The second wave came with travellers, from skiing hotspots in Austria etc. Mainly with young people!



ES1wYWLWsAMvU57


That was after the first 648 cases about ten days ago. If you take some days between discovery and death...

All of e.g. Bavarias 15 or 18 death cases were between 67 and 99.

I actually expect Germany to cope better with the virus then most of the other countries because of the organisation, social structure, discpline and health system.

And yes, there is always some people that do not catch the seriousness of the situation.

How are so few old people catching it, young population or are they just staying at home?
 
day 10 of isolation and I’m spiraling truth be told. Moved to this country ten months ago so don’t have a lot of close friends here, so already had a bit of loneliness kicking in.
I have ps4/Netflix/books/work from home. But I’m crumbling here. I won’t go out with friends and put others at risk - following the gov advice here, but I’m spiraling

I'm sorry. I've been calling friends and family and doing therapy by phone (not everyone has money to do this I know) and it's made me feel less alone, though hasn't helped with some other things (rage, anxiety). I don't know how it is with young people (first time I've ever not included myself in that, 33) but people my age and up were constantly on the phone until 10 years ago so are all used to hour long phone calls and they go by in a snap.
 
All of California is now in a Stay at Home state. 40m people. Hopefully they’ll stop people coming in from other states too to effectively slow down the virus transmission rates.
If it works to really reduce the case load then I’m all for it. Not sure how long , beyond say 14 days, it’ll last though.
 
Got sent through videos yesterday of Army trucks coming through the port of Belfast, not sure of the significance of it yet but could this be start of lockdown and preparation for it. Government wont risk saying anything to start mass hysteria and further panic buying.

On the subject of kids working at home for school, not all of them have access to internet or a computer to be able to do the work on. How can they educate themselves when they dont have these things?
 
90 million is extrapolating the very worst cases in the US to the rest of the world. That worst case won't happen because steps are already well above the level of treating it like the flu.

Still scary but it almost certainly won't be that bad - will almost certainly involve significant deaths of course.
You mean it won't happen in the US? Large parts of the rest of the world won't be able to mitigate it.
 
As a Singaporean, I would say the SARs experience was crucial. After SARs, the government developed a system called DORSCON and laid out plans and strategies to handle epidemics. That way, we don't need waste time on the drawing board whenever something happens. Government agencies also have drills every now ans then, that helped improve our readiness.

The government also set aside funds to build our infrastructure. By a great stroke of luck, a new center for communicable diseases that can house infected patients was just opened months before the outbreak, and immediately put to good use.

At the societal level, the memory of SARS is still fresh and everyone knows the seriousness of an outbreak.

When it comes to efficiency I raise my hats of to Singapore, the best in the world in terms of readiness.

But to be fair, it's easier to be efficient when you're rich and only have to deal with a city wide country with a 3 million inhabitants.

Your neighbour (my country) Indonesia can only cross their fingers and brace for impact.