dwd
Saturday Night Spies
Sounds like better numbers for us (the UK) today?
63 new cases and only 4 deaths. That can't be right?
63 new cases and only 4 deaths. That can't be right?
Thanks for the link. That’s a high percentage!This recent Forbes article mentions 17.9% show no symptons, don't know how accurate that is or if the sample size is big enough but it's definitely a significant part, I'd say.
I'm by no means an expert so can't answer your second question with any certainty but I'd guess that the body of young people produces antibodies quickly enough so that you don't get sick / show symptons.
Sounds like better numbers for us (the UK) today?
63 new cases and only 4 deaths. That can't be right?
That would make senseI dont think England has announced today yet, that might just be Wales and Scotland so far
So it’s been a few weeks since this man came back, he’s likely to be one of the % that doesn’t show or have any symptoms. But he would have infected his wife when he got back but it’s been a couple of weeks and until she shows symptoms? (I don’t know if she even has)
It’s so strange and scary at the same time.
Anyone know the percentage of people who catches this without ever knowing or showing symptoms ? How can you have a virus come and go without even knowing about it!?
It's a northern (English) thing - we used to have breakfast, dinner and tea. Not breakfast, lunch, dinner
We used to have school dinner ladies as well, even made TV shows about them...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinnerladies_(TV_series)
We have our share of morons here as well.
ThanksNo-one really knows just how many people don't show symptoms. There are a couple of studies that have come up with estimates (basically best guesses at this point). One says about 17%, but is based on an average age of 60 and incomplete data, another estimates just over 30%. The 30% one has a giant confidence interval (anything from 7 - 50%).
Sounds like better numbers for us (the UK) today?
63 new cases and only 4 deaths. That can't be right?
No science is right but some science is clearly wrong. You need to have a long hard think about why our government chose the riskiest possible advice rather than listening to the scientists who have successfully tackled it in China and South Korea. The answer, as always, is bias. They liked the results so they assumed it was correct even though the assumptions were flawed at a basic level as the majority of scientists pointed out.
No-one really knows just how many people don't show symptoms. There are a couple of studies that have come up with estimates (basically best guesses at this point). One says about 17%, but is based on an average age of 60 and incomplete data, another estimates just over 30%. The 30% one has a giant confidence interval (anything from 7 - 50%).
You'd be talking months to go through a trolley full, surely?
Only 20 critical too, doesn't seem right.
That would make sense
The UK is not China and it's not South Korea. To blindly listen to others would be a huge mistake. There is no other country with the same makeup of health services, population and cultures. And no scientist or expert you have seen in the media knows what they all are unless they are employed by the government and given access to that information, and even then some things are just an unknown. Good modelling relies on proper inputs and a constant adaptation of those inputs in response to new information. That seems to be exactly what the UK has done.
Horribly, and tragically for the family concerned, it's often these kind of cases that let the researchers get new insight into what influences the disease - whether that turns out to be genetic or otherwise. Sometimes the clues they find in the tragedies give them other clues in terms of treatment or vaccine development.https://news.yahoo.com/coronavirus-...381.html?ncid=facebook_yahoonewsf_akfmevaatca
One big family, 3 died and another 3 in critical condition. No underlying conditions. What am I missing here?
https://news.yahoo.com/coronavirus-...381.html?ncid=facebook_yahoonewsf_akfmevaatca
One big family, 3 died and another 3 in critical condition. No underlying conditions. What am I missing here?
I'd be very sceptical about China. South Korea have done great, and so have Singapore, but both of these countries benefited massively from the infrastructure they developed and the learning they could take from the SARS outbreak. This lecture is very informative. Our society could not have possibly responded the way they did.No science is right but some science is clearly wrong. You need to have a long hard think about why our government chose the riskiest possible advice rather than listening to the scientists who have successfully tackled it in China and South Korea. The answer, as always, is bias. They liked the results so they assumed it was correct even though the assumptions were flawed at a basic level as the majority of scientists pointed out.
Always a silver lining in any situation it seems.A further three GP postponed, up to and including Monaco.
I'm not saying there are scummy people out there but there is plenty on Amazon if you have wads of cash, seems people went in and picked up a 'little' bit more than they needed.I hope so mate. we are running low on nappies and baby formula
Are all stoners complete feckhead conspiracy theorists? Got a couple of 'mates' who smoke a lot and both of them think this is a conspiracy.
Latest Facebook pearl -
"Strangle small business, reduce community interaction, divide people, discourage cash-handling, coerce the people and leave all the pickings for the big companies, perhaps? "
Such an edge lord
I heard it was the American government trying to stop China from leading in the world trade and it was some kind of weapon that’s why America had so few cases..Are all stoners complete feckhead conspiracy theorists? Got a couple of 'mates' who smoke a lot and both of them think this is a conspiracy.
Latest Facebook pearl -
"Strangle small business, reduce community interaction, divide people, discourage cash-handling, coerce the people and leave all the pickings for the big companies, perhaps? "
Such an edge lord
I'd be very sceptical about China. South Korea have done great, and so have Singapore, but both of these countries benefited massively from the infrastructure they developed and the learning they could take from the SARS outbreak. This lecture is very informative. Our society could not have possibly responded the way they did.
Place has gone mad over toilet rolls be careful very strong language..
That’s a rough Belfast accent, luckily it’s not my part of the woods..Can someone translate this?
Can someone translate this?
So it’s been a few weeks since this man came back, he’s likely to be one of the % that doesn’t show or have any symptoms. But he would have infected his wife when he got back but it’s been a couple of weeks and until she shows symptoms? (I don’t know if she even has)
It’s so strange and scary at the same time.
Anyone know the percentage of people who catches this without ever knowing or showing symptoms ? How can you have a virus come and go without even knowing about it!?