Massive Spanner
The Football Wrench
This is why we need to install bidets.No toilet roll, handwash and pastas in my local asda in the north.
Wife works in gordons and apparently they cant get anymore deliveries of toilet roll.
This is why we need to install bidets.No toilet roll, handwash and pastas in my local asda in the north.
Wife works in gordons and apparently they cant get anymore deliveries of toilet roll.
So if someone in an Amazon sorting center gets it we are all ***ked.
Herd Immunity is a phrase the government are spewing, its faux behavioral science stuff.
To attain that sort of immunity means 90% of the population must have the antibodies.
That means 90% of the population, plus those who die, must have contracted the virus.
This is what happens when a bloke who worships eugenics to explain away how he is rich beyond 'he was born rich', to justify his own existence, gets into power.
At a 3% death rate, 95% contamination would mean 1.8 million deaths.And no one in the media is even batting an eyelid at what they are proposing.
I work in a university. Regardless of what the government says - we're considering all sorts at present. e.g. stop loaning laptops, books in the Library. All staff work remotely etc. Lots of plans, but we will see.There's been a fair amount of suggestion that one of the reason UK Universities are still open is because staff are currently on strike over pay, conditions, equality, casualisation, pensions and conditions and if they had to close them those staff would have to be paid.
It's the sort of boneheaded thing I can see being true tbh.
95% of people are going to be infected you guys are the Alex Jones of redcafe.
You think 90% population has to be immune for it not to spread rapidly that's a load of rubbish. if more then half of the population was immune to this the spread would be insignificant even 40/30 its the fact 0% are which is the problem
95% of people are going to be infected you guys are the Alex Jones of redcafe.
You think 90% population has to be immune for it not to spread rapidly that's a load of rubbish. if more then half of the population was immune to this the spread would be insignificant even 40/30 its the fact 0% are which is the problem
At least TRY and read what I put there.
johnson's government is suggesting we develop herd immunity.
That is the required level of infection to accomplish that.
I've not heard of herd immunity outside of vaccination rates. Were they talking about subsequent years rather than present?
Considering your user name and the last line, there is a joke in there somewhere.Some lass who is always off with anything more than sniffle has for some reason come into work despite her coughing and running hot.
I'm packing up my laptop tonight and not coming in for a whilst, can easily WFH, just don't trust people.
The reason I have read is that lots of Universities have campuses so it's not as easy as just shutting them down for X. There is still thousands of staff that need to service the University (food, cleaning, security, ect) even if students are not attending lectures. It's not like the majority of schools where you just lock the front door.
I work in a university. Regardless of what the government says - we're considering all sorts at present. e.g. stop loaning laptops, books in the Library. All staff work remotely etc. Lots of plans, but we will see.
Spray the box with Dettol spray.I was literally just thinking this as I pressed order on something from Amazon a moment ago.
I know the term but never seen it used this way. It's typically used to encourage vaccination so the herd can protect those who can't be vaccinated etc.Its a behavioural science concept.
Its also very specific, herd immunity requires the presence of antibodies in 90% of the herd.
The only way to develop antibodies right now is to both contract and survive it. Even then, with reports of people contracting it more than once, this may provide ineffective.
It's true, of course, but most of them do shut down at least once a year (usually for Christmas) with students still resident there, so there'll be some idea of what staff are essential. I assume more would be required to come in still, but it could have been worked out by now.
So do I, the planning at ours is to put up some more hand sanitisers and tell people to self isolate if they've been to hot spot countries. I'm sure contingency measures are being put in place behind the scenes (the popular assumption is that it's going to require a herculean effort by already fecked off staff to offer up distance learning versions of their courses), but it seems too little, too late as far as I can see.
Don't want to spread it to the martiansAstronauts to work from home too?
It's true, of course, but most of them do shut down at least once a year (usually for Christmas) with students still resident there, so there'll be some idea of what staff are essential. I assume more would be required to come in still, but it could have been worked out by now.
Well it worked in War of the Worlds so..Don't want to spread it to the martians
Don't forget there are something like 20 billion cases of common cold in the world each year. Fever is usually the first stage of the virus.
Please tell me you’ve stopped that disgusting habit of yours.
Queues for supermarketsHow so ?
That's what I've been doing. Ironically, I bought a sideboard thing from Amazon that went through Lombardy in Italy on its way here. Sprayed the shit out of the box.Yeah gloves and disinfectant on the box I suppose.
If you can still buy some.Spray the box with Dettol spray.
Surely one of the biggest questions has to be around what to do with the thousands of international students universities have if there was a shut down which included campus spaces?
The second issue is that students receive maintenance loans and visas (for international students) for a set period of time. If they add another month or months to their course then it becomes a bit of a nightmare financially. That goes for students not on campus too.
Same for every disease thoughI personally think the media are just perpetuating a panic response. It's fecking annoying. What kind of lesson does this teach the kids? When faced with something potentially problematic, shit yourself constantly, think illogically and panic.
That said, the 3% fatality rate being banded around is complete horseshit imo. There will be far more than 480 cases of corona in the UK. Far more. The thing that bumps up the mortality is the lack of reporting/testing for milder symptoms.
I was literally just thinking this as I pressed order on something from Amazon a moment ago.
Tell me where, I want to hoard it all.There was plenty of pasta on the shelf this morning in the shop - and toilet paper!
I personally think the media are just perpetuating a panic response. It's fecking annoying. What kind of lesson does this teach the kids? When faced with something potentially problematic, shit yourself constantly, think illogically and panic.
That said, the 3% fatality rate being banded around is complete horseshit imo. There will be far more than 480 cases of corona in the UK. Far more. The thing that bumps up the mortality is the lack of reporting/testing for milder symptoms.
Shit starting to get real now - surely if ROI are shutting schools, etc. that the UK must follow suit?
Not necessarily.
If you lockdown too early, you risk the virus re-entering the location after it's lifted.
If you lockdown too late, it has no effect because people in their homes will already be infected.
The point of lockdown is not to wipe out the disease. Covid-19 is already too global and the world is too connected for that to be feasible in any sense. It's only going to boomerang back when trade/tourism restarts.
The point of lockdown is to slow the spread of the disease at the right point in order to ease the pressure on medical services.
It remains to be seen if Singapore and Hong Kong got things right. Chances are, they'll require a second lockdown. The risk then becomes civil unrest and economic collapse if there are too many lockdowns in too short a time.
I'm not sure you read what the poster said.95% of people are going to be infected you guys are the Alex Jones of redcafe.
You think 90% population has to be immune for it not to spread rapidly that's a load of rubbish. if more then half of the population was immune to this the spread would be insignificant even 40/30 its the fact 0% are which is the problem
You spelt South Korea wrong.
The amount of money they are going to lose from all of this will be astronomical. A lot of the bodies, companies and clubs will not recover from it. Obviously they understand people's health is important but they also have to look after the financial side of their sport. It is disheartening but that is the way of the world.Sporting governing bodies have come out looking the worst out of all this shit. F1 refusing to cancel or postpone the inaugural grand Prix.
It's mental. Not only are they hot beds for transmitions, they're not even critical to day to day function of society. I mean I get it energy companies, refineries etc don't shut down because they still need to provide these critical services. What makes these bastards think they're so important?
It's not a matter of opinion. Mortality rates are between 8% and 0.5% in countries where outbreaks have occurred. The 3% estimates being touted are based on mortality rates seen under a collapsing infrastructure. In short, if the hospitals can cope and the spread does not go exponential mortality rates will be considerably lower hence the measures to slow the spread that are being proposed.I personally think the media are just perpetuating a panic response. It's fecking annoying. What kind of lesson does this teach the kids? When faced with something potentially problematic, shit yourself constantly, think illogically and panic.
That said, the 3% fatality rate being banded around is complete horseshit imo. There will be far more than 480 cases of corona in the UK. Far more. The thing that bumps up the mortality is the lack of reporting/testing for milder symptoms.