That's not quite what happened is it.
Manchester was offered an amount, asked for more, and when they weren't immediately given what they wanted spent the next week telling anybody who would listen how bad the government is handling this, the situation in Manchester isn't as bad as is being made out, and how the people should pretty much ignore anything they say. Any you wonder why the government didn't respond well to this?
Firstly, that's 'not quite what happened is it'. You're going off information that the government is saying happened, and you actually trust this government given what has happened over the last 8 months? The Government states that there were meetings/phone calls that happened, Burnham denies that events the government says happened actually happened. It's tit for tat, completely based on who you believe. And I personally do not trust this government/prime minister and his cronies especially when money is involved.
Secondly, if the government is offering a certain package, what are we saying
60 million was it, and the Mayor is saying 'listen, we need more than that we've done the calculations on our end and this is what we need to save our economy crashing further'. Why, WHY on earth would you fall back to a
22 million package? This is the most ludicrous part. You give them what you can, which was obviously 60 million. Just because the Mayor is saying 'we need more, that's not going to cut it' doesn't mean you turn around and say 'ah well we offered that, you wanted more so we're going to just give you 22 million.' That is just over a third of the 'supposedly' offered amount, which if they offered that...they can afford that? It's disgusting, that's what I call playing with lives over money.
Thirdly, this isn't just Burnham. Every single MP in the Greater Manchester area, Tory including, is in agreement with him. This isn't one man against the government, this is an entire northern area with all of it's MPs saying 'this is what we need to survive economically'.