Russian invasion of Ukraine | Fewer tweets, more discussion

I have complete sympathy for normal, innocent, Russians. I'm Pakistani and have to live a lot of my adult life with the stigma of being brown and a Muslim, and having an extra set of eyes that make you feel like a villain. A colleague of mine who is Russian and works in the UK was worried that his bank account might get frozen just because he's a Russian national.
That's the thing. I have a sympathy for normal, innocent Russians too. However I think we can all agree, it's a minority. Majority still supports the war in Ukraine, supports Putin. So the question is, how do you punish those people without affecting the innocent, normal minority? I think the idea here is to take away something that their people take for granted, which has been happening for decades - shit on EU, western countries but still be able to freely travel, holiday, work here.



Fecking hilarious seeing people flee in fear for their lives isn't it?

:wenger:
 
So the question is, how do you punish those people without affecting the innocent, normal minority?
Probably not by restricting their travel visas. I tend to believe that those who often spend time in western countries are more likely to be non-supporters of this war.
 
Majority still supports the war in Ukraine, supports Putin.

https://www.politifact.com/iraq-war-polls/
https://news.gallup.com/poll/8038/seventytwo-percent-americans-support-war-against-iraq.aspx

it's not a new thing. doesn't justify collective punishment if you assume the russians have been propagandized into support the same way the americans were. the majority of americans had no role in deciding to go to war with iraq. in fact a tiny minority decided that. there is no difference here that i can see.

the travel thing is a bad idea. do it at state level, as is already happening and has been done.
 
Why the feck do you always bring US into a discussion.
your argument is that the majority of russians are bad because they support the war. does that hold up as true in the american case? i don't think so and i think me forcing you to consider it irritates you because you know it's a contradiction. in each case, an incredibly tiny minority decided on war and then propagandized the public into accepting it and the military never has a choice, that's part of their role. they do what they're told.
 
Probably not by restricting their travel visas. I tend to believe that those who often spend time in western countries are more likely to be non-supporters of this war.
Maybe. Or maybe it will have some positive effect in Russia because it will mostly affect the upper class people as mid/lower class simply could never afford travelling outside Russia. Who knows. But the fact that it brought an outrage from Russian MFA spokeswoman is a good sign IMO.
 
It's a bad comparison. In Tel Aviv civilians who live there are under attack and have to flee for their lives.

In Crimea a military target was attacked and idiots suddenly realize that they are on vacation in a contested warzone. It's a completely different situation.

There are people who live in Crimea as well who might be running in those videos, why are we assuming all of them are vacationers? The same can be said for those in the video in Tel Aviv, I'm sure it's a popular holiday resort.

Unlike the Ukraine military, funded to the kilt by western nations, Palestinians aren't able to afford laser guided missiles so their aim would be a bit off. And hardly any of their missiles even manage to do damage because Israel's defense is funded by the US, unlike in Crimea who actually saw a missile hit close by.

The point still remains, both videos show civilians running from dangerous situations when their country is the aggressor in a war, one gets sympathy, he'll you'd be called a racist for making fun of them, while the other group is vilified.
 
your argument is that the majority of russians are bad because they support the war. does that hold up as true in the american case? i don't think so and i think me forcing you to consider it irritates you because you know it's a contradiction. in each case, an incredibly tiny minority decided on war and then propagandized the public into accepting it and the military never has a choice, that's part of their role. they do what they're told.
I am not American, I don't know what they propagandise or not propagandise and I have no idea why you always bring US into discussions here. You obviously hate them but you don't have to constantly repeat the same things and present it as facts. I am from a former soviet union country which was lucky enough to escape it and join the NATO/EU. My views are probably biased but I have absolutely no illusions about Russia as a country. While some western countries were busy trying to convince everyone that Russia has changed etc., we knew it was absolutely not the case. Russia, as a country in general is rotten to the core and I am sick of seeing the west trying to play nice with them while they are laughing behind our backs seeing how spineless we usually are. We are always thinking about how not to offend or God forbid create some inconveniences for Russians first rather than look after our own people who were struggling for decades under the Soviet rule or the ones that are currently dying in the Ukraine as we speak.
 
Maybe. Or maybe it will have some positive effect in Russia because it will mostly affect the upper class people as mid/lower class simply could never afford travelling outside Russia. Who knows. But the fact that it brought an outrage from Russian MFA spokeswoman is a good sign IMO.
I think so too, it will mostly impact the elites and those living in Moscow and St. Petersburg which is what Putin is afraid of.
 
The point still remains, both videos show civilians running from dangerous situations when their country is the aggressor in a war, one gets sympathy, he'll you'd be called a racist for making fun of them, while the other group is vilified.
You clearly struggle to differentiate hitting military targets or hitting whatever as long as it touches the ground.
 
You obviously hate them but you don't have to constantly repeat the same things and present it as facts.
i don't actually. that was the point i was making. i don't hate the russians either. the two situations are absolutely parallel. two populations where the majority had no say in a war but "supported" it. it's on you how you want to think your way around it. but claiming majority complicity is problematic if you have any interest in being consistent with your logic. which means to be truthful or attempt it.
 
Taking glee at the horror of innocent people? Jee, I wonder if the reaction would be the same if someone posted the same to people fleeing Tel Aviv's beaches when there are sirens going on during rocket attacks :rolleyes:

Wtf is wrong with people.

It's interesting how bloodthirsty people get, not from being involved in the war but just by following it voyeuristically online. That's the people tweets like these are aimed at.
 
It's interesting how bloodthirsty people get, not from being involved in the war but just by following it voyeuristically online. That's the people tweets like these are aimed at.

I think they are more so aimed at lifting the morale of domestic audiences by demonstrating how their troops (family members) are striking back at an invading army that has traumatized their nation.
 
It's interesting how bloodthirsty people get, not from being involved in the war but just by following it voyeuristically online. That's the people tweets like these are aimed at.
All starts with this childish 'orcs' stuff, people learn about WW2 in school and how Hitler slowly turned a whole nation against groups of people he decided were 'bad' and yet the dehumanisation of Russians is commonplace in this thread. Needs to stop, we are better than that.
 
There are people who live in Crimea as well who might be running in those videos, why are we assuming all of them are vacationers? The same can be said for those in the video in Tel Aviv, I'm sure it's a popular holiday resort.

Unlike the Ukraine military, funded to the kilt by western nations, Palestinians aren't able to afford laser guided missiles so their aim would be a bit off. And hardly any of their missiles even manage to do damage because Israel's defense is funded by the US, unlike in Crimea who actually saw a missile hit close by.

The point still remains, both videos show civilians running from dangerous situations when their country is the aggressor in a war, one gets sympathy, he'll you'd be called a racist for making fun of them, while the other group is vilified.

The way I understand it, many Russians in Crimea settled there to rig the referendum. So you can hardly say they are fully innocent since they definitely know what they were doing and why.

But I get the reservations about content like this. It's not my thing either. Despite all those horror stories, I imagine most Russians and even most Russian soldiers are no despicable human beings but mainly just people who have been manipulated to support the war (respectively to participate in it). Very few human beings are evil by nature.
 
All starts with this childish 'orcs' stuff, people learn about WW2 in school and how Hitler slowly turned a whole nation against groups of people he decided were 'bad' and yet the dehumanisation of Russians is commonplace in this thread. Needs to stop, we are better than that.

Exactly. Even if you see it purely strategical, empathy helps you understand the enemy (and possibly undermine his morale). Dehumanizing them won't help in any capacity (except maybe soldiers having to kill their Russian counterparts).
 
All starts with this childish 'orcs' stuff, people learn about WW2 in school and how Hitler slowly turned a whole nation against groups of people he decided were 'bad' and yet the dehumanisation of Russians is commonplace in this thread. Needs to stop, we are better than that.
When orcs stop doing orcs things, we stop calling them orcs. Very straight forward.
 
I think they are more so aimed at lifting the morale of domestic audiences by demonstrating how their troops (family members) are striking back at an invading army that has traumatized their nation.

The domestic audiences probably speak Ukrainian, and civilians aren't a part of the invading army. It's civilians dying we're celebrating here, not military targets.
 
The domestic audiences probably speak Ukrainian, and civilians aren't a part of the invading army. It's civilians dying we're celebrating here, not military targets.
I probably missed that. Who is here celebrating civilians dying?
 
The domestic audiences probably speak Ukrainian, and civilians aren't a part of the invading army. It's civilians dying we're celebrating here, not military targets.
Did I miss something? I am celebrating the attack on the Crimean air base, what civilians died there?
 
The domestic audiences probably speak Ukrainian, and civilians aren't a part of the invading army. It's civilians dying we're celebrating here, not military targets.

They speak mostly Russian, even those who speak Ukrainian as a first language. And no one is celebrating civilians dying, rather they are acknowledging their own success in fighting back against an enemy that is on their land.
 
You noticed that too, eh?
i'm assuming you're taking that personally despite my post being the opposite of a personal attack. if you read it you'll see that i said the majority in each case bears minimal responsibility for the minorty's decision to go to war and the subsequent propganda which translates that into "support". it was the opposite of an anti-us argument. i think you're smart enough to know that.

it's also not the "what about the west" argument, either. it's about consistency in moral logic instead of viewing everything through tunnel vision.
 
I mean, probably not here, but if ukraine targeted a russian town and some civilians died, there would be plenty of people celebrating on social media.
 
It’s just you bring up the US in everything non-US related at about the same clip that you bring up Democrats in everything non-Democrat related and it’s amusing to see someone else notice.
well in this case it's fairly relevant.

That's the thing. I have a sympathy for normal, innocent Russians too. However I think we can all agree, it's a minority. Majority still supports the war in Ukraine, supports Putin. So the question is, how do you punish those people without affecting the innocent, normal minority? I think the idea here is to take away something that their people take for granted, which has been happening for decades - shit on EU, western countries but still be able to freely travel, holiday, work here.

i don't think we can all agree that it's a minority and the us example demonstrates exactly why. i'll leave it for other people to follow up on the argument on the last page but it's entirely consistent and not in any way a nonsequitor.
 
I probably missed that. Who is here celebrating civilians dying?
Did I miss something? I am celebrating the attack on the Crimean air base, what civilians died there?

This tweet is about the consequences for civilians in Crimea. Not just from the recent attack, but from the ones that haven't happened yet. It's not hitting the military targets that's being celebrated and ridiculed, it's the civilians running for their lives.

You can celebrate hitting the air base if you want, that's not what this video is about. This is celebrating the fates of German civilians in Dresden 1945 rather than celebrating the strategically important military victory it was.
 
This tweet is about the consequences for civilians in Crimea. Not just from the recent attack, but from the ones that haven't happened yet. It's not hitting the military targets that's being celebrated and ridiculed, it's the civilians running for their lives.

You can celebrate hitting the air base if you want, that's not what this video is about. This is celebrating the fates of German civilians in Dresden 1945 rather than celebrating the strategically important military victory it was.
So what you are saying is, no civilians died, correct? We are essentially "celebrating civilians dying" although no civilians have died. Interesting mental gymnastics.
 
This tweet is about the consequences for civilians in Crimea. Not just from the recent attack, but from the ones that haven't happened yet. It's not hitting the military targets that's being celebrated and ridiculed, it's the civilians running for their lives.

You can celebrate hitting the air base if you want, that's not what this video is about. This is celebrating the fates of German civilians in Dresden 1945 rather than celebrating the strategically important military victory it was.

Its for domestic and Russian consumption. The message is Crimea is not Russia (or Russian territory), and as such, can be hit by the Ukrainian military. The fleeing civilians bit was probably put in to scare off any Russians who think they can go on beach vacations on Ukrainian land while the rest of Ukraine is made to suffer.
 
Its for domestic and Russian consumption. The message is Crimea is not Russia (or Russian territory), and as such, can be hit by the Ukrainian military. The fleeing civilians bit was probably put in to scare off any Russians who think they can go on beach vacations on Ukrainian land while the rest of Ukraine is made to suffer.
that is obviously true. i think the point being made is that people external to the conflict, following it on twitter or wherever, are assimilating the kind of propaganda that has immense use for the ukrainian soldiers and civilians but no place beyond that.
 
So what you are saying is, no civilians died, correct? We are essentially "celebrating civilians dying" although no civilians have died. Interesting mental gymnastics.
Not only that, but “it’s not about [the airbase attack]” when that’s exactly the footage being shown.
 
So what you are saying is, no civilians died, correct? We are essentially "celebrating civilians dying" although no civilians have died. Interesting mental gymnastics.

I don't know if any civilians died. Civilians usually do die in wars, and if the attacks are going to keep coming in Crimea then it'll happen there as well if it hasn't yet. It's war, it's inevitable.

But, if you want then I'm happy to correct myself. The video is celebrating civilians running for their lives, but it's only celebrating future civilians potentially dying because no one has died yet.

Or, if that's also too strong: the video is celebrating civilians running for their lives, but because it's impossible for civilians to die in Crimea it's not celebrating death.
 
I don't know if any civilians died. Civilians usually do die in wars, and if the attacks are going to keep coming in Crimea then it'll happen there as well if it hasn't yet. It's war, it's inevitable.

But, if you want then I'm happy to correct myself. The video is celebrating civilians running for their lives, but it's only celebrating future civilians potentially dying because no one has died yet.

Or, if that's also too strong: the video is celebrating civilians running for their lives, but because it's impossible for civilians to die in Crimea it's not celebrating death.
Thanks, much clearer now, especially the bold part :lol:
 
So what you are saying is, no civilians died, correct? We are essentially "celebrating civilians dying" although no civilians have died. Interesting mental gymnastics.



Haha just came to post that, excellent.

Crimea river.

celebrating a military strike as if the propaganda value for ukrainian morale, which is absolutely valid, is somehow normal beyond combatants and the civilian populations subject to war. hamas hits tel aviv "haha... excellent" is something i've never seen or want to see because it's insane unless you're in hamas or something.
 
Last edited:
celebrating a military strike as if the propaganda value for ukrainian morale, which is absolutely valid, is somehow normal beyond combatants and the civilian populations subject to war. hamas hits tel aviv "haha... excellent" is something i've never seen or want to see because it's insane unless you're in hamas or something.
I give up. It's fascinating how you always manage to add Tel Aviv or Iraq or the US to the discussion.
 
celebrating a military strike as if the propaganda value for ukrainian morale, which is absolutely valid, is somehow normal beyond combatants and the civilian populations subject to war. hamas hits tel aviv "haha... excellent" is something i've never seen or want to see because it's insane unless you're in hamas or something.
Wait why did you quote me?