TMDaines
Fun sponge.
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2014
- Messages
- 14,129
This speech is doing a good job of killing any hope at a line being drawn at Donbas.
How long has he been rambling?His plan is to talk everyone into submission.
His plan is to talk everyone into submission.
Some broadcasters in the US have cut away. Wonder if Sky should be doing the same. We are doing his job for him here.
How long has he been rambling?
It’s not true, as simple as that. The last time it was true was in 2014 — after many years of slowly losing public support he got a lot of it back on the wave of patriotic euphoria of getting Crimea back… it’s just that in a few years people had noticed that somehow everything went to even more shit.Now, probably yes. Though even in a fair election, he would easily win a majority, if not a pluarlity.
What about the last 4 elections? He might have been an unknown in 2000 so I grant you that, but what about the other elections when he easily won, without needing to 'steal' the elections?
When a nation chooses a dictator and keeps supporting him, they are to be blamed too. Same as how Germans were for Hitler, same are the Russians for the modern Hitler.
Yes. Don’t look for any common sense or rationality there. Any public platform, Russian or not.Even on non Russian social media ?
Democrats, cia, fbi, irs , dmv etc fault.Guys guys it has nothing to with recreating the Eastern Bloc. Its a NATO issue
Meanwhile Putin
Bonkers, what's the penalty ? Fine , or...Yes. Don’t look for any common sense or rationality there. Any public platform, Russian or not.
BBC and Sky cut him off.
Caf's commies: it is the US hegemony for Putin saying that.Guys guys it has nothing to with recreating the Eastern Bloc. Its a NATO issue
Meanwhile Putin
He’s even less popular in big cities. In the regions a narrative that Putin himself is decent but he’s surrounded by incompetent and corrupt people is still alive (somehow), in Moscow & St. Petersburg, where people get a lot more informational exposure, barely anyone believes that.
The problem is certain people will listen to this and be influenced by it, and the same audience will not have the same level of opportunity to have it debunked to them.To be fair, I'd rather listen to a 'history lesson' from a nutjob than Boris
It’s exactly like an overly long conspiracy video on Youtube. The first 5-10 minutes is funny for the level of batshit craziness, then it is really boring, and then just ultimately a bit sad when you see an old, confused man waving his fist at the clouds.
There was a decent response to that from a U.K. minister at the time but I can’t find it!Here’s an article on Ukraine that Putin penned last year, I’m guessing this speech is a condensed version?
http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/66181
I’m only hoping he has overplayed his hand here and this will strengthen the resolve of NATO and partners. You cannot make the claims and threats Putin is and let it slide. Basically wants to wipe Ukraine off the map.This sound like its going in the direction of justifying a full-scale invasion more than anything else?
Is anyone else getting that impression?
1st warning is a fine, the 2nd can lead to an actual prison sentence.Bonkers, what's the penalty ? Fine , or...
But the USA?I’m only hoping he has overplayed his hand here and this will strengthen the resolve of NATO and partners. You cannot make the claims and threats Putin is and let it slide. Basically wants to wipe Ukraine off the map.