The Mitcher
connoisseur of pot noodles and sandwiches
Insults can be true though?Not if it's true.
Which it obviously is, otherwise he'd be in the squad.
Insults can be true though?Not if it's true.
Which it obviously is, otherwise he'd be in the squad.
Subscribe 100%. Too many fanboys on comments. His behaviour in last couple months has been disgraceful.Why are fans forgetting that it was Rashford who came out with an interview with a journalist saying he is ready for a new challenge...
After a new manager gets appointed, he says that but that isn't an insult to the club and the manager but when the manager asks him to train, its an insult.
Exactly. Rashford is the one who went public first. There's no point in Amorim trying to protect him. You can't do an interview saying you want a new challenge then train like shite and expect the coach to protect you. It would send the wrong message to the rest of the squad who are out there giving 100% day in and day out. He's on over 300k a week and can't be bothered to turn up. He absolutely deserves to be called out publicly for it. It's a disgrace.Why are fans forgetting that it was Rashford who came out with an interview with a journalist saying he is ready for a new challenge...
After a new manager gets appointed, he says that but that isn't an insult to the club and the manager but when the manager asks him to train, its an insult.
Subscribe 100%. Too many fanboys on comments. His behaviour in last couple months has been disgraceful.
He didn't even respected the incoming of a new manager. Entitlement runs deep on his veins.
Any other player other than the "academy kid who will be a boy with potential forever and feeds children" would be grilled to the bones by everyone here.
Who has he insulted? It’s an incredibly soft take to say he insulted Rashford by saying he won’t pick players that don’t train hard enough. Would you ever get yourself in a position where you allow a manager to make that statement about you? And if you did, would you say it was fair? Or fair to the other lads that do train hard enough to be eligible for selection?I like Amorim but one thing I know is when a manager publicly insults his own players it doesn't tend to work out for them in the long run.
? De Gea can‘t pass out the back and made horrendous mistakes.
Insults can be true though?
Everyone knows who Rashford is, any club potentially interested will have known he has his issues and could be disruptive. I don't think Amorim's words will have much of an impact.Some iron discipline may be good for the club. But pushing down the valuation of a player we desperately need to sell for a good price is not what we need, given our financial situation.
Why are fans forgetting that it was Rashford who came out with an interview with a journalist saying he is ready for a new challenge...
After a new manager gets appointed, he says that but that isn't an insult to the club and the manager but when the manager asks him to train, its an insult.
Subscribe 100%. Too many fanboys on comments. His behaviour in last couple months has been disgraceful.
He didn't even respected the incoming of a new manager. Entitlement runs deep on his veins.
Any other player other than the "academy kid who will be a boy with potential forever and feeds children" would be grilled to the bones by everyone here.
Exactly. Rashford is the one who went public first. There's no point in Amorim trying to protect him. You can't do an interview saying you want a new challenge then train like shite and expect the coach to protect you. It would send the wrong message to the rest of the squad who are out there giving 100% day in and day out. He's on over 300k a week and can't be bothered to turn up. He absolutely deserves to be called out publicly for it. It's a disgrace.
The culture at the club has to change.
Manchester United head coach Ruben Amorim says he dropped Marcus Rashford and Alejandro Garnacho for the Manchester derby due to "selection" reasons rather than injury or illness.
agreed.Why are fans forgetting that it was Rashford who came out with an interview with a journalist saying he is ready for a new challenge...
After a new manager gets appointed, he says that but that isn't an insult to the club and the manager but when the manager asks him to train, it’s an insult.
Yeah, and imagine how that looks to a new manager?! New guy comes in asks for a certain level of attitude and application, doesn't see it in training and so drops the player, player then immediately (2 days later) releases statement saying that he's ready for a new challenge away from the club. That's fecked up.I'm not saying I think it was smart of Rashford to do that interview, but it happened AFTER he and Garnacho was dropped from the squad against City and:
Rashford expectations: Madrid, Barcelona, Bayern, Arsenal, Inter, Napoli all to come knocking and can't wait to sign him and will be fighting over matching his 300k salary cause hes worth it.
Reality: Will Go on loan to spurs or go to Saudi league.
Arsenal are having a bit of an injury crisis and they won't pay the 5 million to get him for remainder of season on loan. Arteta won't bring any rot back to the club after clearing it all during his tenure.
Should have answered it like he answered it the previous hundred times. He clearly got riled up & gave a blunt answer, when a more level headed response would have been to take the diplomatic route.How would you have liked the manager to answer? He was specifically asked about whether it would be useful to have someone with Rashford's pace and ability in the squad. The insinuation from the questioner was 'are you not kinda cutting off your nose to spite your face here?'. It's hard to answer that question without criticising Rashford, and he tried to do it in a general way by essentially saying that however good a player might be he's worthless to the team if he's not prepared to show up with 100% commitment. Yes the words he chose were pretty incendiary, but the problem here lies with Rashford - even ex-United players like Rio and Gary Nev are saying it. The fans have seen it with their own eyes for years now. It's a mad world if the only person not allowed to speak the truth is the guy's manager.
I'm not saying I think it was smart of Rashford to do that interview, but it happened AFTER he and Garnacho was dropped from the squad against City and:
Yes that is not super harsh, he could have taken it on the chin and returned later like Garnacho. But this probably came together with some internal discussions that he wasn't happy with. Telling the media you are ready for a new challenge can also mean a new challenge in the club, a different role/project etc.
Just saying Rashford's interview didn't come out of nowhere. Amorim had first strike in a public way. Could potentially have benched them and not brought em on. Or at least more vague with why dropped.
Its true Amorim would rather not play rashy at all yes. The way he phrased it is still insulting. We can move on thoughNot if it's true.
Which it obviously is, otherwise he'd be in the squad.
Sorry.You are not half-tedious.
he didn't appear at all riled up, but I expect he's extremely tired of being asked the same questions time and again. Whether he was right or wrong to use the analogy he did at least everyone - players, fans, pundits, journalists, potential new signings etc etc - are all now in full understanding that attitude and application are the single most important things to him. Anyone not meeting those standards will be held to account, and in the long term it is a good thing for the club to take a hard line on.Should have answered it like he answered it the previous hundred times. He clearly got riled up & gave a blunt answer, when a more level headed response would have been to take the diplomatic route.
As much as Sancho and now Rashford may have been performing under the required standards in training, it cant help when it comes to getting rid of them, which has to be the end goal.
People are acting like the rest of the footballing World doesn't know what is going on with Rashford and Amorim has shed light on an unknown mystery about him. Every sane person with 2 pairs of eyes can see that Rashford for the past few seasons:
This is not a case where there is an underbelly with a player that nobody knows about. He has been constantly dropped from the matchday squad. So, it doesn't matter if Amorim said he would play somebody else before him, his actions are also saying the same and it's public knowledge.
- Does not track back
- Does not put 100% effort into each game
- Has disciplinary issues
- Does not contest for balls
- Has been dropped by 2 different coaches for stuff off the field
Agree - He’s been dire now for 3 seasons out the last 4 really.No matter what had happened, Rashford’s performances on the pitch have been horrendous for a good year and a bit now. Just not good enough for United, and rightfully dropped. That interview scuppered any hope of him being given a chance again.
100%, time to move him on, get behind the manager on this one, Rashford has seen off enough ManagersNo matter what had happened, Rashford’s performances on the pitch have been horrendous for a good year and a bit now. Just not good enough for United, and rightfully dropped. That interview scuppered any hope of him being given a chance again.
It is worse when Bayindir plays. Onana is very comfortable on the ball.What's the point of having a GK or CB that can play out if the rest of your team can't maintain possession in the opponents half? Pointless
No he didn't, he mentioned no names.He said he'd rather have the reserve keeper instead of him, insinuating he doesn't give enough.
Thats insulting, regardless of whether it's true or fair. It's still an insulting comment to make toward the player.
Do I like the blunt nature from Amorim toward him? Yes. Is the words accurate? Probably. Do I think it's also quite insulting for Rashford? Yes.
They aren't mutually exclusive.
He was speaking on the topic of Rashford and referenced playing the GK coach over someone who didn't train 100%. He didn't need to mention Rashford directly given the question was specifically about the player.No he didn't, he mentioned no names.
You expect Rashford to survive Amorim..? Nightmare fuel.Rashford has a contract till 2028.
There is a slight possibility that Amorim will not be here in 2028. Especially, if we continue to play like this.
Agreed, and for balance, Rashford didn't say that his new challenge meant playing alsewhere - though we all know what both statements really meantNo he didn't, he mentioned no names.
He was speaking on the topic of Rashford and referenced playing the GK coach over someone who didn't train 100%. He didn't need to mention Rashford directly given the question was specifically about the player.
Not true - he said: "I will put Vital (goalkeeper coach Jorge) before I put a player that does not give the maximum every day. I will not change in that." Pretty funny really and no less than any fan would want, surely?Agreed, and for balance, Rashford didn't say that his new challenge meant playing alsewhere - though we all know what both statements really meant
That was his reply to a question about Rashford. There is no illusion whatsoever who he was talking about, even if the general point applies to all playersNot true - he said: "I will put Vital (goalkeeper coach Jorge) before I put a player that does not give the maximum every day. I will not change in that." Pretty funny really and no less than any fan would want, surely?