1988
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2017
- Messages
- 1,017
What did he say about transfers?
I'm not expecting any signings:
Would have preferred we went into negotiations with him saying 'We are desperate for players and money is no object'Kind of a standard comment from a coach leading up to the market opening, no? I wouldn't expect him to say we're looking to sign anyone even if we were going to do something mad in the market. Can't be seen as desperate or we'll get fleeced as per usual.
in 2020, it looked like we had a front three in situe that would terrorise defences for the next decade, and bring us firing back to glory. Unfortunately, due to a collective responsibility of the character and mentality of the players in question, and the culture, handling of players and recruitment thereafter by club heirarchy, the landscape changed beyond recognition. We've handled the changing winds appalingly, with inexperienced and unqualified leaders making requisite decisions, and Amorim is now left with the embers.
It will take time for him to clear the dust, remove the dry rot, and rebuild as necessary. But I trust in his hands, more than any others over the past decade, to finally get this right. He has green shoots with Amad and a decent support cast in Ugarte, Mainoo and Bruno, along with a more solid defence than the days of Lindelof and AWB starting week in week out.
It's a big job, so let's have a bit of patience. These days, every missed pass, shot, tackle and game that isn't won at a canter is taken apart like a last minute cup final defeat. The reality is different of course, we've always lost easy games or dropped points we should have picked up as fatigue or injuries hit (Stoke '84, Liverpool '92, Everton '12 anyone?), and last night's performance in particular was very disappointing - but we won.
Let's hope we back this up on Sunday (It's cold enough sat at OT in Jan these days dodging water and mice, without another defeat to boot), and go on a couple of important cup runs to build some momentum. I still feel completely different now to the abject mire and mediocrity experienced under ETH. Amorim makes difficult decisions exactly when needed, he communicates effectively, his substitutions are impactful, his planning is believable, and I'll certainly continue to support him in restoring order for the forseeable future.
Maybe you should open your eyers a bit more.If we simply don't have the players to play in this formation and not be shocking then what is the point in doing it? The standard answer seems to be that we are "embedding patterns of play". I'm just curious if anyone can see what these patterns of play are that we have started to embed. They are not perceptible to me so far, but others are more tactically astute than me.
I think Amad won the game with a bit of quality from Erickson.Yet the attacking and midield quality that was available played a large part in winning the game
ThisI know everyone is piling on this formation and how rubbish we look going forward.
If you look at the context, we have a bouncing board up top, which makes it impossible to build.
When you play out the back and teams press, the ST is a free man, if he can hold the ball, he can create chances for others, like what Zirkzee done when he came on.
Hojlund is the biggest problem in this team and how Amorim wants us to play.
Maybe you should open your eyers a bit more.
How fecked is he on getting guys in? I'm thinking with Ratcliff/Ineos the purse strings will be tied for at least 3 more windows unless we can get 150-180m for Rashford, Garnacho and Mainoo.
How fecked is he on getting guys in? I'm thinking with Ratcliff/Ineos the purse strings will be tied for at least 3 more windows unless we can get 150-180m for Rashford, Garnacho and Mainoo.
Lord Amad. First player to score a hat trick in premier league for united since SAF left.
I think their left winger dominated and created some great chances. Yoro couldn’t deal with him. The overall impression was that even though we had more possession, they created better chances in the first half.The stats just don’t support your take here. There’s no way on earth a team can dominate for 60 minutes end up with 40% possessions and less than half the shots/xG of the opposition. You were just caught up in the disappointment of a poor performance and that’s distorted the balance of play in your mind.
I watched the game knowing the result in advance (couldn’t watch it live) and we were only properly dominated for a spell in the first half. Other than that we were by far the most dominant team, especially after we made our subs, with Southampton only occasionally causing us problems on the break.
Not that it matters. Or makes the overall performance less disappointing. But it is reassuring that Amorim turned things round with his subs. That’s already a recurring theme and bodes well for the future under him as manager. It’s also a nice change from life under ETH where we were more likely to disimprove after substitutions.
If we simply don't have the players to play in this formation and not be shocking then what is the point in doing it? The standard answer seems to be that we are "embedding patterns of play". I'm just curious if anyone can see what these patterns of play are that we have started to embed. They are not perceptible to me so far, but others are more tactically astute than me.
Maybe you should open your eyers a bit more.
The positioning for the away swinging corner just looked odd. Southampton nearly scored at 1-1. The Southampton player got really good contact with the ball and could have scored except the ball hit a player from his own team.I think their left winger dominated and created some great chances. Yoro couldn’t deal with him. The overall impression was that even though we had more possession, they created better chances in the first half.
Also, we are super slow in buildup. And our old friend “Can’t play through the high press” visited us again, along with “Can’t defend set pieces/corners”. I think we have enough evidence that our defending on corners needs to be reviewed and changed. It looks like zonal marking in the 6yd box and man v man outside. Our 6yd box is so congested, the opponent is just going to dump the ball in there and get a richocet or glanced header and it’s in. I’d pull out Deligt and Maguire, Yoro, put them man v man to get the opponents from going to their spots and utilize Licha and Ugarte plus the wingbacks in zonal marking. I dunno… just looks shambles at the moment.
Not true. I remember 2 specific games. Martial vs Sheff Utd and Fernandes against Leeds I think it was.Lord Amad. First player to score a hat trick in premier league for united since SAF left.
We also haven’t moved more than 2 places in the table…We havent lost in 2025. Its our year.
It is not easy to make progress with these players, not least with our poor attackers.Was interesting to hear earlier that Iraola didn’t get a win for his first 9 PL games when he took over Bournemouth. And now look at them. It’s very easy to claim something doesn’t work when it’s this early on. Iraola had a full pre season too.
Second half of the season… ?We havent lost in 2025. Its our year.
Is it possible to actually lock this thread during games? It was utter train wreck against Southampton.
Imagine if we happen to go behind tomorrow, it will be another shitshow of posts. Kinda exhausting.
Similar philosophy to player performance threads, yeahIs it possible to actually lock this thread during games? It was utter train wreck against Southampton.
Imagine if we happen to go behind tomorrow, it will be another shitshow of posts. Kinda exhausting.
Is it possible to actually lock this thread during games? It was utter train wreck against Southampton.
Imagine if we happen to go behind tomorrow, it will be another shitshow of posts. Kinda exhausting.
Can't defend for our lives, one long ball