The Firestarter
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2010
- Messages
- 31,639
If he was pragmatic he would switch to the system these players know, to at least finish at a non embarrassing place in the table, then buy suitable players in the summer (cant do so in January) They lost games in the previous system but never such a nose dive. And what RvN tried is actually better than EtH's version, so there is some compromise.What do you mean that doesnt sound great? He is being pragmatic not dogmatic. Jamie Jackson asked him this 5 at the back is not working so why not go 4 at the back to the old system? To which Ruben if I dont have convictions in my own idea how am I sell this idea to the players? He also said these players were tailor made and hand picked for each position in the previous system of 4-2-3-1 even with 3 preseasons and 2 full season playing the same formation and they still lost games and thats why there was a coaching change in the first place.
Let's say current players are really dim and can't ever learn/play his system. Everything Amorim has said points to the fact he'll continue trying to teach them, whatever the results. That's him being dogmatic.