- Joined
- Sep 30, 2011
- Messages
- 1,472
Cant wait to see the much taked about 3 4 3 formation that he is going to use. I personally think a 35 2 would suite us more.the reason being
one of our glaring fault is the midfield and in a 3 4 3 formation we normally play two midfielders and we are even struggling with 3 midfielders and can be fatal but in 3 5 2 we can play 3 midfielders and two attakers and we can sacrifice one of the wing players . None of the three attackers score anyway
one of our glaring fault is the midfield and in a 3 4 3 formation we normally play two midfielders and we are even struggling with 3 midfielders and can be fatal but in 3 5 2 we can play 3 midfielders and two attakers and we can sacrifice one of the wing players . None of the three attackers score anyway