Hugh Jass
Shave Dass
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2016
- Messages
- 11,610
Certainly improved the team.Has he actually improved the team?
Seems like the same problems still exist despite him been in charge now for 6 weeks.
Certainly improved the team.Has he actually improved the team?
Seems like the same problems still exist despite him been in charge now for 6 weeks.
Poor to see that some fans are already having their knives out and give it to him, especially after he beat City away.
He said it will get ugly and with that squad I am not surprised. But ffs support him
It’s also not like last season where we have 7 defenders missing every week. It’s now actually more depressing - this is the level of our squad when fit.Yeah, it’s not like last season where we were consistently conceding great chances to mediocre teams which they kept missing. It’s the opposite as we are hardly conceding any good chances but our opposition keep scoring from all half chances and individual mistakes.
Certainly improved the team.
I just hope he settles on a first 11 early in the new year so we can work on the system properly with the players he sees as staying. My second hope is Zirkzee isn’t part of that!What else do you expect on this forum. Some of the posts today have been pathetic. Even pulled a poster up as they already claim they hate Amorim.
He got praised for saying we need to take the pain this season to be in a better place next season, else next season will be no better, and he even warned us a storm will come first.
Then when it does its knives out for some.
The stats all show we are improving, whilst our results are not there yet because a number of players are too busy showing why they don't deserve to be here for the long term. Its short term pain I am will to accept, providing Amorim sees who needs to go, whilst a handful of fans will never learn and will choose short term results over everything else.
We are at the start of a long-term transformation so clearly need a manager who can do that whilst winning every game. Easiest job in football this.What else do you expect on this forum. Some of the posts today have been pathetic. Even pulled a poster up as they already claim they hate Amorim.
He got praised for saying we need to take the pain this season to be in a better place next season else it will be no better, and he even warned us a storm will come first.
Then when it does its knives out for some.
The stats all show we are improving, whilst our results are not there yet because a number of players are too busy showing why they don't deserve to be here for the long term. Its short term pain I am will to accept, providing Amorim sees who needs to go, whilst a handful of fans will never learn and will choose short term results over everything else. You'd think that short term-ism would have past.....it seems not.
I agree. He did say there would need to be a lot of rotation due to the games. Hopefully after New Year we are through that.I just hope he settles on a first 11 early in the new year so we can work on the system properly with the players he sees as staying. My second hope is Zirkzee isn’t part of that!
He was the best of a bad bunch last season but the sooner Dalot is replaced the better.This lineup is the best we can field. I hope Amorim starts with this team beginning with the Wolves game.
Onana
Mazraoui – De Ligt – Martinez
Amad – Casemiro – Ugarte – Dalot
Garnacho – Bruno
Hojlund
Yes he has, we are creating way more chances than we did under ETH, what hasn't changed are the mistakes, not much a coach can do about that, it's not like it's just 1-2 players doing that either, it's endemic in the teamHas he actually improved the team?
Seems like the same problems still exist despite him been in charge now for 6 weeks.
We can whinge and moan all we want and it won't make a lick of difference as to the reality of the situation, this isn't his third or even second season where he's got to implement his style and bring in suitable players, he's been handed a dysfunctional side with players who play as if they've never played a principled and measured game in their lives.Improving stats?! Give your head a wobble. Stats don't win trophies. Stats don't challenge for titles.
Yes I did. Did you watch them. What from today was great? We had some chances but Bournemouth were waltzing right through us.You didn't actually watch the games then.
Same problems in terms of players who still have brain fart moments which cost us goals, and players who couldn't score in a free brothel. I expect this will be addressed in the summer.Has he actually improved the team?
Seems like the same problems still exist despite him been in charge now for 6 weeks.
I guess Liverpool didn’t control the game against spurs then since they conceded 3. You do realise you can control games and still concede goals right? You can concede goals like spurs did against us twice by playing out from the back… cheap goals conceded. Doesn’t mean you haven’t controlled a game does it?How can you honestly say we have controlled any of the last 2 games, have you seen them? Who says they have controlled games where they have conceded 7 goals! And yet we are meant to be better defensively, what planet are you on?
It wasn't great by any means. But we were never outplayed, for all the waltzing Bournemouth had, they didn't actually have any clear cut chances. Do you remember Onana having to make a great save? A set piece and daft penalty. Like the Spurs game, a set piece and two goalkeeping errors.Yes I did. Did you watch them. What from today was great? We had some chances but Bournemouth were waltzing right through us.
We have barely controlled the games though. Did it look like control today and Thursday. Yes we created chances but we look dreadful defensively, teams go through us easily. That is not control.I guess Liverpool didn’t control the game against spurs then since they conceded 3. You do realise you can control games and still concede goals right? You can concede goals like spurs did against us twice by playing out from the back… cheap goals conceded. Doesn’t mean you haven’t controlled a game does it?
We absolutely did control that Spurs game for about 75 minutes. What are you on about.We have barely controlled the games though. Did it look like control today and Thursday. Yes we created chances but we look dreadful defensively, teams go through us easily. That is not control.
Whilst not forcing the GK to make saves; they got in several dangerous situations and if they had a better final ball or end product, it could have been worse.It wasn't great by any means. But we were never outplayed, for all the waltzing Bournemouth had, they didn't actually have any clear cut chances. Do you remember Onana having to make a great save? A set piece and daft penalty. Like the Spurs game, a set piece and two goalkeeping errors.
I do blame Amorim this match for the midfield. Either play Bruno as an 8 or don't play him.
The all conquering and charity shield winning Arsenal needed two corners to score. For all the supposed going through us easily, teams don't really create muchWe have barely controlled the games though. Did it look like control today and Thursday. Yes we created chances but we look dreadful defensively, teams go through us easily. That is not control.
If Forster had not given us 2 goals, we would have been struggling. We weee better on the attack but Spurs were dangerous coming forward as well. I wouldn’t call it us controlling it.We absolutely did control that Spurs game for about 75 minutes. What are you on about.
And what they hell did we create. We literally sat bsck and done feck all the entire game. We did not provide any threat whatsoever.The all conquering and charity shield winning Arsenal needed two corners to score. For all the supposed going through us easily, teams don't really create much
They didn't get that final ball because our shape was good. It has been good since Amorims second game.Whilst not forcing the GK to make saves; they got in several dangerous situations and if they had a better final ball or end product, it could have been worse.
I understand what you say but that is not our situation, if it was then great. If you reference Arsenal as an example, it’s not because we did feck all attacking in that game. I would hardly call it control.You can definitely control a game and concede a lot of goals. Why is that a shocking concept to you?
Here’s a hypothetical extreme situation. You deny the opposition any chances at all from open play but concede three corners and they score all of them. At the other end you create a load of chances but shite finishing and good goalkeeping stops you scoring any goals.
If you understand that as a hypothetical then you can see how it’s possible to generally control a game while still losing convincingly.
The same form which made him the exciting talent he is. Coming from out wide, using his pace and coming in. I know he’s not going to change it and I know he’s trying to find players for right positions but I hope he can do that sooner rather than later.What about Garnachos form makes you think that we would look better with him on the pitch? We have looked better, much better, since Amorim came in. Results have been inconsistent but the underlying numbers have been steadily improving.
Amorim has already adapted his instructions multiple times and continues to do so. A formation that you start with is far from the most important thing anyway. City play a 4-3-3 but with the ball, they play a 3-2-4-1. That's literally the exact same on the ball set up as we do. Off the ball we defend sometimes with a 4 at the back, sometimes with a 5 at the back.
Has he actually improved the team?
Seems like the same problems still exist despite him been in charge now for 6 weeks.
Well we can agree to disagree. I think Bruno is better as an out and out 10 and Garnacho out wide coming in. Obviously the tactics were wrong last season and part of this with ETH. Anyway Amorim has his formation so will see if can find the right formula.This is such strange logic considering the amount of times we’ve set up exactly like that and still stunk the place out. It’s so weird to me that people think doing what’s already been tried and failed will definitely improve on what we saw today.
We did not control the opening 30 minutes today until Bournemouth scored. It was very even with both sides turning the ball over regularly and they got into good areas with space quite a few times.We are controlling games. Individual errors are costing us. Go back to the Arsenal game and Garnacho and Rashford both lost possession for the corners. Bruno gave the ball away against Forest. Didnt see the game today, only highlights but another set piece.
I think he realises that but didn't he say earlier that it's better to go through that pain barrier this season so at least next season we will be one step ahead?My personal view is that managers should be adaptable. We could have Garnacho and Amad wide, Bruno 10 and a striker. We would look far better with players in natural positions. He may want to play it and I understand but he doesn’t have good enough players at wingback which are key positions.
I understand what you are saying regarding he style but I certainly don’t think it’s good enough to forfeit a season. I don’t think that is acceptable at all. We still have a lot to play for and qualifying for the UCL would have financial implications for next season and recruitment.I think he realises that but didn't he say earlier that it's better to go through that pain barrier this season so at least next season we will be one step ahead?
I personally don't want us to have recruited another manager we admired based on his playing style and philosophy to come to United and then declare they can't play that way with our team.................a la ETH.
I am more than happy to forfeit this season if we are moving in the right direction.