izec
Full Member
big difference Falcao and DI maria were available. No top defender was available this summer, exception Benatia. But from the moment Bayern wanted him, we had no chance. That is the reason why we should have gone for Vlaar.
Perhaps we could have gone for Benatia before the world cup and had a free run at him?big difference Falcao and DI maria were available. No top defender was available this summer, exception Benatia. But from the moment Bayern wanted him, we had no chance. That is the reason why we should have gone for Vlaar.
I am bemused by the discriminative comments about Vlaar, hes probably in the top 5 central defenders last year, performance wise, but hes is not good enough because he plays for Villa, i guess, or he is not a superstar exotic defender?
Who is the answer for our defensive problems. Hummels? Slim chance of getting him. We are are not blessed with age with a depth of truly word class defenders. Even if we find another Vidic, it may take him 6 month to settle it did for him and Evra.
Even if we go for Vlaar now, i fear Villa may flat our refuse and let him place out his contract as he is far more valuable to them keeping them in the league than 4 or 5 million in Jan..
Hasnt looked that good this season for Villa. 29 now.
Not a chance
Just looked at the Ron Vlaar thread on a random Villa forum. They say he's injury prone. Do not want.
I get that signing a top class CB will be difficult but surely we can at least sign someone who can actually stay fit?
Games played this season 3 - W2 D1 with one goal conceded...
In short, he (and Villa) made a great start to the season - then he got injured...
Wiki says his league appearances in his last 5 seasons were 32, 32, 32, 27 and 32. Numbers in bold were in the Eredivise, which has 36 game seasons.
We can only dream of a Manchester United central defender racking up those sort of stats.
We need to be realistic in January literally no top top players will be avaloble so we need a stop gap.
Vlaar and dare I say it shawcross is perfect temporary cover and both are a hell of a lot better than what we currently have. They have plenty of prem experience and on their day are both very good CBs probably get both for under £25 million.
No brainer for me we should go for them 2 as I said purely as temporary cover until we can go for the big boys.
Bakers been decent actually. Neither are what we needAnd he's looked no better than Nathan Baker in those matches.
Great post and I think people tend to get lost on the term ''world class''. Players aren't born world class and a very talented player, in the right setting can perform at this level or just below it, case in point Gary Cahill wouldn't look half the player he is playing behind Fellaini and Cleverley alongside an ever changing partner. Phil Jones is young enough to outgrow his fitness and composure issues but we can not wait for him whilst discarding him would be foolhardy so the best course of action is a stop gap signing.I wouldn't mind Concrete myself. I don't think we necessarily need a 'World-Class defender'. That is just the result of the short-termists we have become of late and have lost sight of what it takes to build a top side I think. It is panic.
Our league has been full of teams with very good defences for years simply made up of good, organised defences. Tony Pulis doesn't require Mats Hummels to get a team to stop conceding every half an hour, for example. I also think that our defenders are actually good enough anyway, although I do hold question marks re: Evans.
The likes of Demichelis has come into an organised back-four at City and been excellent. Concrete could help us to improve. We are getting the basics wrong at the back at the minute. I reckon the line between a 'world-class centre half' and a 'good' one can be a bit blurry in my opinion anyway. It largeley depends on what team you play for, for starters. I think centre-half is the one position where it is not as simple as taking a world class player out of one team and putting him in another and expecting world class performances. The whole team defends.
I think Rio Ferdinand, for instance, was undoubted world-class. Vidic, however, I think, was certainly a world class player in the end, but not necessarily more talented than Vlaar and in the Villa side may have looked little better. The conditions at United were just right for Nemanja's strengths to blossom, but I do believe that another player in his mould could have probably replaced him competently who may well have spent most of the last decade at Europa League level.
Basically, some teams just know how to defend. We don't right now. I'm more inclined to believe that could be fixed on the training ground (and in the medical centre) as much as it could be in the transfer market. I think Senderos is the worst PL centre-half of recent times (although Mike Williamson is rapidly closing on him), but even he has had excellent international tournaments in the Swiss defence. Materazzi was a nobody struggling at Everton, but in the Inter team he became a CL winner and World Cup winning international regular. Right now, I don't think Hummels would change much. Bringing in Tony Pulis to fix our defence would be more effective, providing he has fit defenders to work with anyway.
Yes to Vlaar but I think Jones already has what Shawcross has with potential to improve when he cuts out the rashness.
Baker is as average a footballer as you'll see.
I wouldn't mind Concrete myself. I don't think we necessarily need a 'World-Class defender'. That is just the result of the short-termists we have become of late and have lost sight of what it takes to build a top side I think. It is panic.
Our league has been full of teams with very good defences for years simply made up of good, organised defences. Tony Pulis doesn't require Mats Hummels to get a team to stop conceding every half an hour, for example. I also think that our defenders are actually good enough anyway, although I do hold question marks re: Evans.
The likes of Demichelis has come into an organised back-four at City and been excellent. Concrete could help us to improve. We are getting the basics wrong at the back at the minute. I reckon the line between a 'world-class centre half' and a 'good' one can be a bit blurry in my opinion anyway. It largeley depends on what team you play for, for starters. I think centre-half is the one position where it is not as simple as taking a world class player out of one team and putting him in another and expecting world class performances. The whole team defends.
I think Rio Ferdinand, for instance, was undoubted world-class. Vidic, however, I think, was certainly a world class player in the end, but not necessarily more talented than Vlaar and in the Villa side may have looked little better. The conditions at United were just right for Nemanja's strengths to blossom, but I do believe that another player in his mould could have probably replaced him competently who may well have spent most of the last decade at Europa League level.
Basically, some teams just know how to defend. We don't right now. I'm more inclined to believe that could be fixed on the training ground (and in the medical centre) as much as it could be in the transfer market. I think Senderos is the worst PL centre-half of recent times (although Mike Williamson is rapidly closing on him), but even he has had excellent international tournaments in the Swiss defence. Materazzi was a nobody struggling at Everton, but in the Inter team he became a CL winner and World Cup winning international regular. Right now, I don't think Hummels would change much. Bringing in Tony Pulis to fix our defence would be more effective, providing he has fit defenders to work with anyway.
Straight swap for clevz would do. Definitely wouldn't pay 12 mill for a 29yo in the last year of his contract.