Red00012
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2018
- Messages
- 13,820
He won us both games.We've played weaker opposition and he's scored 4 goals. Lukaku doing Lukaku things.
He won us both games.We've played weaker opposition and he's scored 4 goals. Lukaku doing Lukaku things.
Probably Rashford in for Lingard with Romelu up top. Although many players stepped up during this injury crisis, many players deserve to play even if off the bench at leastI reckon it'll be Ole's favourite XI but with Lukaku in for Lingard.
Probably Rashford in for Lingard with Romelu up top. Although many players stepped up during this injury crisis, many players deserve to play even if off the bench at least
I loved it when Bertrand tried to take him out with a flying kick but then just bounced off Lukaku as if he was nothing
By "Ole's favourite XI" I have Rashford in there already unless I'm misreading your reply?Probably Rashford in for Lingard with Romelu up top. Although many players stepped up during this injury crisis, many players deserve to play even if off the bench at least
I've seen a lot of people saying this, but what really is the evidence for it? Lukaku could have downed tools in the last few months when Ole dropped him, but he's been showing he wants to work hard and play for the team. Why not keep him around with the clear expectation that he's not an automatic starter, and will be played based on form, at least for another year? Arsenal have two strikers in Aubameyang and Lacazette who only play together 40-50% of the time; both of them are top strikers, and neither are angling for a move.The issue is you can't have a player that expensive sitting on your bench, unless you're a petro club or Madrid (Bale). It's either play in the 1st team or be sold, and that's the crux for Lukaku as he will not accept being a bit-part player, and nor should he.
So, Lukaku replacing Lingard on the right, but with the front 3 still rotating so it won't be a set position.
Friendly wager says Ole picks Rashford over Rom on any form, injuries permittingOn current form, Lukaku will play as a striker, not on the right - that's what I meant.
Lukaku is actually only behind Aguero in goals per minute in the PL this season if we discount penalties (and players with three goals or less).Salah 1 goal every 140 mins this season
Lukaku 1 goal every 141 mins this season
We've played weaker opposition and he's scored 4 goals. Lukaku doing Lukaku things.
That's a helluva a stat. It's such a pity he hasn't been able to develop his non-shooting skills because as a finisher he's not bad.Lukaku is actually only behind Aguero in goals per minute in the PL this season if we discount penalties (and players with three goals or less).
City routinely have players of that value sat on the bench.The issue is you can't have a player that expensive sitting on your bench, unless you're a petro club or Madrid (Bale). It's either play in the 1st team or be sold, and that's the crux for Lukaku as he will not accept being a bit-part player, and nor should he.
I didn't get an alert for this as, for some reason, it said @el3mel posted my message you quoted.On current form, Lukaku will play as a striker, not on the right - that's what I meant.
Ole is a big fan!Friendly wager says Ole picks Rashford over Rom on any form, injuries permitting
I still think he adds a lot to our attack that doesn't show up in the stats. I don't know how OGS sees it though.We’ve been scoring plenty without him.
His importance isn’t high, but He’s good for the tighter games.
Lingard isnt going to be an automatic starter everyone but he'll always be in and around there. You need a squad of players. Adding Sancho this summer would give us a very strong set of 5 options between them with Sanchez injured, and then the youth. Look at City's attack. Real Madrid having Bale as a squad player all these years. You need competition for places and we'll have that.
I reckon it'll be Ole's favourite XI but with Lukaku in for Lingard.
Martial?We’ve been scoring plenty without him.
His importance isn’t high, but He’s good for the tighter games.
This is his second seasonFair play to the big man, he's really come through with the goods exactly when required the last couple of games. Think he only had a couple of previous braces for us in 2.5 seasons, amazing for him to come through with two more in quick succession. Three of those four were cracking finished on his weak foot too if I'm not mistaken.
This is my stance on them. Score goals/set up goals and dominate forwards/keep clean sheets and it's all good.Top performance today, won us the game hands down. Delighted for him.
So long as he’s a lethal striker around the box and works his socks off, I couldn’t give a flying feck about the compilations/highlights of his bad controls. It’s similar to the situation with Smalling’s passing. We know neither is fecking Ronaldinho on the ball, but we know they can do their job really well and so long as they do that, the rest is bollocks to me.
Also, I love how he’s worked on his finishing with his right. Now you don’t know which angle to close down. Very impressed with that.
Agreed. We should be adding to the squad not subtracting. If Arsenal can make Lacazette/Aubameyang work then we can with Lukaku/Rashford. We play enough games throughout a season to allow plenty of minutes.I've seen a lot of people saying this, but what really is the evidence for it? Lukaku could have downed tools in the last few months when Ole dropped him, but he's been showing he wants to work hard and play for the team. Why not keep him around with the clear expectation that he's not an automatic starter, and will be played based on form, at least for another year? Arsenal have two strikers in Aubameyang and Lacazette who only play together 40-50% of the time; both of them are top strikers, and neither are angling for a move.
Unless Lukaku is actively angling for a move, I don't see the point of selling him.
I loved it when Bertrand tried to take him out with a flying kick but then just bounced off Lukaku as if he was nothing
I've seen a lot of people saying this, but what really is the evidence for it? Lukaku could have downed tools in the last few months when Ole dropped him, but he's been showing he wants to work hard and play for the team. Why not keep him around with the clear expectation that he's not an automatic starter, and will be played based on form, at least for another year? Arsenal have two strikers in Aubameyang and Lacazette who only play together 40-50% of the time; both of them are top strikers, and neither are angling for a move.
Unless Lukaku is actively angling for a move, I don't see the point of selling him.
Agreed kind of... rashfors currently makes a lot of mistakes and bad decisionsFor all the stick he got, he's still a better striker than Rashford and can actually be relied upon to score, something that isn't always the case with Rasher except for when he was in his purple patch.
I'd still play Lukaku mostly centrally and closer to goal.
Disgraceful tackle attempt...I saw someone describe it as like a fly bouncing off a tank
That's just another baseless myth that people like to throw around. He's been useful plenty of times without scoring. Just look at our game at the Emirates for a recent example, he doesn't score but does excellent work to create two goals.
Disgraceful tackle attempt...I saw someone describe it as like a fly bouncing off a tank
I think he realised he’s right footed.
maybe that's why his first touch has been bad all this time. hes been using his weaker foot!
Right footed Lukaku is the new RVN. Where has he been hiding this ambidexterity!?