- Joined
- Jan 3, 2009
- Messages
- 46,299
Anyone already playing...is there a patch to download first?
I have literally never heard of this website, although you always get some contrarian journalists trying to make a name for themselves when a big game is released. Every other major publication is raving about this game.
Read it and tend to agree with the above tweet. They also gave BOTW a 6 and watchdogs 2 a 9. So it’s clear their tactic is to get as much attention as possible.
If the lead was a female I’m sure they would have given it a 10.
Are you trolling?
''SJW''
nah mate it's a shite video game. Still gonna get as it's so pretty looking
No I actually thought the review was interesting as it's was saying something different.Are you trolling?
Anyone already playing...is there a patch to download first?
No I actually thought the review was interesting as it's was saying something different.
They're saying something different for the sake of clicks and to be the outliers. As @Bojan11 pointed out they generally underscore games that are highly rated by others. It's an agenda driven review, the most impartial review I've seen so far is from Gamespot, who recognise the negatives but also recognise how good it is is spite of a few flaws.
Never really liked SA, thought the map was so .. empty, despite being so big. I also fecking hated all that gang war stuff and territory crap. Vice City shits all over it imo.
GTAV is really good but just look on metacritic, it's one of the highest rated games ever!
3GB day one patch confirmed.
Read it and tend to agree with the above tweet. They also gave BOTW a 6 and watchdogs 2 a 9. So it’s clear their tactic is to get as much attention as possible.
If the lead was a female I’m sure they would have given it a 10.
You can’t talk about not following orders.Harsh I used it a few times but you lads didn't follow orders as they usually got us killed
Yeah, they fecked up the scale for reviewing. Really a 5 or 6 should be considered decent, but it's considered crap because they only really review on an 8, 9, 10 scale.Game reviews kinda fascinate me - so much gets "GOAT" contending scores it's actually made high scores irrelevant a bit for me. They've set the precedent though, so it's hard to scale the review scoring systems back a bit. An 8/10 for games is seen as shit generally being my point.
No doubt Rockstar have another super replayable game on their hands here though, will delve into it.
Yeah, they fecked up the scale for reviewing. Really a 5 or 6 should be considered decent, but it's considered crap because they only really review on an 8, 9, 10 scale.
Are you taking the piss ?Ah so you are trolling
Back to the rating system again 5 is starting point and depending on performance that number slides up or down.So many people do this for all things. I don't if it's because of critic reviews. There was a thread about the player ratings and a lot of people see 7 as average, whereas 7 for me is good because I use the full scale (like you should!).
Back to the rating system again 5 is starting point and depending on performance that number slides up or down.
4hrs left, can’t wait, going to be some hootin tootin gun slinging going on partner, yeeeee haaaaa!!1
So many people do this for all things. I don't if it's because of critic reviews. There was a thread about the player ratings and a lot of people see 7 as average, whereas 7 for me is good because I use the full scale (like you should!).
While I agree that all forms are a bit out of whack. It's massively out of whack for gaming.....probably because a lot of them go massively in on a point system where 0.0 to about 6.9 are generally pointless and all mean the absolute same thing = shite.
I genuinely will rarely give a perfect score to anything, if it's bloody perfect, why would you even bother with anything else after it pretty much. I'm a stickler on even giving out 9/10's for films. But for a game I'd feel the pressure to give that score more because otherwise it'll look I'm absolutely destroying an otherwise great game because I'm giving it 8/10 and not 9.6/10.
So are you and not only should you be capable of using your and you're correctly but you should realise that taking one review that calls it average and acting like it's law, even though all other reviews are full of praise, is childish and showing you have a bias against the game.Are you taking the piss ?
Rather than someone have criticism of a video game your excited for, you've instead come up with a conspiracy involving SJW/Women/Clickbait. Christ almighty your a grown up for feck sake.
Are you taking the piss ?
Rather than someone have criticism of a video game your excited for, you've instead come up with a conspiracy involving SJW/Women/Clickbait. Christ almighty your a grown up for feck sake.
Oh god what I've gotten into.So are you and not only should you be capable of using your and you're correctly but you should realise that taking one review that calls it average and acting like it's law, even though all other reviews are full of praise, is childish and showing you have a bias against the game.
You literally mentioned a poster who quoted a tweet saying that the review ''ends in some fecking SJW rant'' and said ''If the lead was a female I’m sure they would have given it a 10.''I never once mentioned SJW or women, but that site is quite clearly trying to create as much traffic as possible, as shown by their previous reviews of highly regarded games by being completely contraian.
Talking of acting like a grown up yet your last response was a fecking emoji.
What do you actually do in multiplayer? What's the goal?
Probably the same as GTA Online. Make money and piss around with mates.Anyone?
Anyone?
This was your original post.No I actually thought the review was interesting as it's was saying something different.
Yeah not sure, bit like GTA 5 maybe? You can get a posse together and carry out missions online in exchange for money/items?Anyone?
Oh god what I've gotten into.
You literally mentioned a poster who quoted a tweet saying that the review ''ends in some fecking SJW rant'' and said ''If the lead was a female I’m sure they would have given it a 10.''
Again why can't someone have criticism of something your excited for without there being a alternative conspiracy.
This was your original post.
Hitler said something different...but that doesn't mean it's good. That site's reviews of other games is very fluctuant to the point of being controversial for the sake of being controversial, not a whole lot of substance to it. The review put up earlier on kotaku.co.uk is very good. A balanced argument of good and bad points about the game delivered in a professional manner with small anecdotes about his playing time. From what I gather it's very slow-paced and the controls are clunky. The visuals and story itself are, unsurprisingly, highly praised.
Whatever, man. Different doesn't necessarily mean valuable/good.
Since we are now into Hitler references this is a bit pointless now but you still didn't answer my point. I don't get why(well I sort of do know why)people have such a strong reaction when someone criticise something they like in particular video games. Why there has to be some alternative motive or some hidden conspiracy rather than 1)The critic having different taste to you or 2)maybe the critic actually has a point
Clunky controls? Rockstar? Never!
I bet Hitler wouldn't have any of that.