RAWK Goes Into Meltdown (2012/2013)

Status
Not open for further replies.
A bit rich coming from your lot, isn't it?

No?

We didn't print T shirts or do that whole publicity stunt. Nor did most of the fans support him once he was banned for four games. The only thing I would have defended was assumptions that people were actually 'racists', since using racist language and holding deep rooted racial beliefs are worlds apart. although the latter generally comes with the former, the former doesn't with the latter.

If you are referring to those who choose to chant about Anton then they are a small group of stadium goers, which make up a tiny proportion of Chelsea fans worldwide.
 
If he leaves in the summer, he will then be banned from playing football in two other countries because of biting.

Yeah, it's the media, the FA and SAF's fault that he is the most disgusting player and biggest cheat ever in football.
 
Off topic a bit, but I've found this on the newcastle forum.
What is a "Giggs"?
A "Giggs" is when you post something that's already been posted. The origin of "Giggs" derives from when Ryan Giggs (of Manchester United fame) scored a goal and a forum member said "Giggs has scored!" significantly later. So when a member appears to be slow and behind the times, we refer to "Giggs has scored" or simply "Giggs". This explanation - used so often – has become a "Giggs" in itself.
how come it was them who came up with this not us? :lol:
 
Rawk Suarez 10 game ban meltdown special part III

Rawkbola Sufferer said:
It's about time someone took the FA to the highest Courts (Sport Arbitration?) where they can scrutinise and expose that cess pit of hubris and corruption. They should already be in shit with FIFA regarding Government interference as is apparant in this case. feck them.

Rawkbola Sufferer said:
He should celebrate first goal after suspension by biting his hand.... wow what a boss celebration that would be..

Rawkbola Sufferer said:
Seriously, just pull Gerrard, Johnson etc. out of the England team and England U21's.... no one on here honestly gives a feck about them anyway, and if they do, they need their head sorting. That will sort this cnuting organisation out. The club doesn't have the balls to do that either though I don't suspect. However, if we don't appeal this, we are serious whipping boys. 10 games is a total joke.

Rawkbola Sufferer said:
I want more Uruguayans at our club....I would love it if Cavani put in a transfer request and stated publically that he only wants to join Luis at Liverpool.....I dream of the day a South American player publicly refuses to entertain joining the Mancs (or preferably any club than us) and stating it's because of how Luis was treated over the Evra affair.

Rawkbola Sufferer said:
But really, why is FA so hellbent on disrupting their relationship with LFC and why are they continuosly treating Liverpool as the enemy, using every chance to subdue, humiliate or simply frustrate whenever possible? Isn't LFC their asset, something they should be proud of, isn't a player like Suarez for all his issues still an asset, a miracle even, a reason why people would continue to watch a game and not a reason they'd turn off the TV or refuse to go to the match?

Rawkbola Sufferer said:
So he bite someone again...what's the big deal? When did football turn into a sport where biting became such a huge issue...

Rawkbola Sufferer said:
Just checked redcafe, it's kinda sad to see how much time they spend talking about anything Liverpool related

:lol: :lol: :lol:
 
There are just no words to describe the delusion from some of those posters. If I didn't know what RAWK was like, I'd guess it was a project put together by The Onion.
 
I wonder what their reactions would be if Wayne Rooney bit a player how Suarez did?

:lol:

I'm just imagining Rooney chewing on a player now, sadly the image is virtually impossible to picture. RAWKites would probably be calling for a 6 month ban and writing to the FA themselves.
 
:lol:

I'm just imagining Rooney chewing on a player now, sadly the image is virtually impossible to picture. RAWKites would probably be calling for a 6 month ban and writing to the FA themselves.
They wouldnt write to the fa directly. They'd write a long, overly dramatic poem type thing on their forum titled 'an open letter to the fa'. And all the other dipshits on that forum would post replies like 'I am honestly crying reading that, YAWN'.
 
There are just no words to describe the delusion from some of those posters. If I didn't know what RAWK was like, I'd guess it was a project put together by The Onion.

I have to agree, its hard to read it and think people are being serious.

They seem to be back on the 'its manchester united running the fa' again now , and its our agenda to get rid of him.

Given they are reading this thread, could one of the brain trust explain to me why they think we would burn that influence to get rid of suarez, who plays for a team that is currently 7th , 33 points behind us, but not get an actual threat, also from south america, Aguero, banned for his two footed stomp on sideshow bob the other week?
 
Rawk Suarez 10 game ban meltdown special part III

I like this one best:

I want more Uruguayans at our club....I would love it if Cavani put in a transfer request and stated publically that he only wants to join Luis at Liverpool.....I dream of the day a South American player publicly refuses to entertain joining the Mancs (or preferably any club than us) and stating it's because of how Luis was treated over the Evra affair.

Translated as:

I want players to publicly state they will only join Liverpool because there you can be as much of a violent, racist twat as you want, and the fans will still love you.
 
I dont get the controversy. Bad tackle are part of football. Getting bitten is not. Biting someone after already being banned for it requires a punishment bigger than the previous time.
 
Somewhere in Allerton, there's a man with a tinfoil hat on his head pushing a shopping trolley full of empty cans and NO Smoking signs, donning a sandwich board bearing the slogan "I fecking Told You I Was Right - The End Is Most Definitely Nigh"

and he really fecking was!

:lol:
 
Perhaps they are all purposely deluding themselves that he is being victimised so that when he leaves they can blame it on the FA driving him out of the country, rather than him leaving to play CL football at a bigger club rather than fighting for 7th season after season.
 
@danroan
Prem League say their incoming chairman Anthony Fry is a Man Utd fan - just like FA's incoming chairman Greg Dyke..& FA Vice Chmn David Gill

We win the league, Suarez gets banned and now that. They're going to crack up.
 
I begin to wonder if some of them actually are WUMMING, knowing that we all read them. You would have thought that they would be aware of this thread and would become self conscious of sounding like perpetual twats and so tone it down, yet if anything it gets worse.

I mean I dont even have quite the same intense feelings of rivalry between the two clubs as United fans do, but still I can clearly see the chasm of difference between RAWK posts and RedCafe ones.

The only thing is i'm not sure they have the intelligence to WUM.
 
Perhaps they are all purposely deluding themselves that he is being victimised so that when he leaves they can blame it on the FA driving him out of the country, rather than him leaving to play CL football at a bigger club rather than fighting for 7th season after season.
Its exactly that. I bet more than a few want to admit it as well but feel the need to tow the company line so as not to be outcast
 
Has none of them suggested that the club should just say "feck The FA" and play Suarez regardless of the ban?
 
I'm afraid that I'm with the old school types that spout off on the box, like Phil Thompson. I'm of a mind that this sort of shit shouldn't happen at our club and it drags the club's name through the mire, encouraging the media and other fans to hate us more than they already do.

I am not the same sort of supporter as a lot of the fans on here, or on any other website. I just think that biting and having a track record for it and being a racist (even though most forum members here will back him to the hilt over that), essentially means we have a player (however good) that shouldn't be wearing the Liverpool shirt.

What fecking galls me the most is that I am viewed as a weapon or whopper for holding these views. What galls me even more is that forum members of other LFC websites think the same (ie: we should support Luis, full stop, no matter what he's done..)

I don't get it and never will. I long for the days when people used to eulogise about Liverpool as a club and we didn't have to put up with the shit we do now.

Meh. feck it. From an out of towner. I just hope that Billericay FC one day get promoted from their shite league to the league proper and then I might be able to support a team where I was brought up near, rather than a team that I had romantic notions about when I was 7, 37 years ago.
Does anyone else think Luis is a gobshite for putting us in this position?
I thought you had joined 'the Liverpool Way' because you were so pissed off with this site?

Or are you back attention seeking again?
:lol:
 
Has none of them suggested that the club should just say "feck The FA" and play Suarez regardless of the ban?

No, but there are a lot who are suggesting that they should loan him to multiple teams in order to finish the ban sooner. They know the football, those scousers.
 
I begin to wonder if some of them actually are WUMMING, knowing that we all read them. You would have thought that they would be aware of this thread and would become self conscious of sounding like perpetual twats and so tone it down, yet if anything it gets worse.

I mean I dont even have quite the same intense feelings of rivalry between the two clubs as United fans do, but still I can clearly see the chasm of difference between RAWK posts and RedCafe ones.

The only thing is i'm not sure they have the intelligence to WUM.

EssexRob since you're one of our most loyal resident chavs, can you sacrifice yourself and sign up & live at Rawk for a short while to tell us what it's like. Engage the rawkites in some stimulating debate and see what they say. Make sure you come back sane and in one piece though :p
 
Has none of them suggested that the club should just say "feck The FA" and play Suarez regardless of the ban?

I'm curious what would actually happen, I assume the ref just stands there refusing to blow his whistle, and eventually abandons the match before it's awarded to their opponents by the FA?
 
I'm curious what would actually happen, I assume the ref just stands there refusing to blow his whistle, and eventually abandons the match before it's awarded to their opponents by the FA?

Yep I'm pretty sure they opponents win the match, the team is fined and maybe docked points (?) for attempting to cheat.
 
Has none of them suggested that the club should just say "feck The FA" and play Suarez regardless of the ban?

They've threatened to pull Johnson and Suarez out of the England squad.


OH NOE ¯\(°_o)/¯
 
Fergie didn't mention it at all as far as I can tell. That indifference will piss them off most of all. If only we could be as strong as him. ;)
 
Cowards! :lol:

They can't take on the might of the Fergie Association, they bottled the fight yet again.

Mind you, their only real weapon is a bunch of scouse nobodies venting their rage from their bedsits. Oh how we laugh :lol:
 
Cowards! :lol:

They can't take on the might of the Fergie Association, they bottled the fight yet again.

Mind you, their only real weapon is a bunch of scouse nobodies venting their rage from their bedsits. Oh how we laugh :lol:

But they will write a letter when they surely will mention in the most poetic way how unjust is the ban.

The show is not over yet.
 
Some 'brainiac' RAWK poster said that to get around the ban Suarez should be loaned out somewhere during his ban so he can still play.

Er...he still has to come back and serve his suspension you idiot. :lol:
 
On Suarez not appealing:

You know what I think its better that he didn't. It gives us the moral high ground and stops giving the FA the chance to try and back up their normal bollocks. Whatever we do is not going to stop the FA being cocks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.