RAWK Goes Into Meltdown (2012/2013)
- Thread starter Plan M
- Start date
- Status
These two ridiculous shots, he should never have taken them because the angle was too tight.Typical dumb stuff from him
I'm sure that makes the previous 25 odd years worth of standing behind lies ok in their eyes.
..
This is the RAWK equivalent to posting porn all over redcafe.
You just couldn't write this shit.
There is a new team in the league ?
Apparently, that 24 points behind quality mark was by Rodgers, Jesus.
*********** wannabe.Instead of preparing his team for the season, he was too busy looking for the bloody cam and Liverpool cringe worthy reality TV show
They do. It consists of Joe Allen looking forward, then turning around and knocking it back to Skrtel and Agger about 20 times a game.
Anything being said about Suarez-Sturridge...perhaps creating a mini-boom/bust cycle
Are there 2 seperate leagues? One that reflects the league based on results and another one in a different reality
There's about 12, mate.
......
Haha, the better side!
Besides, it was hardly the whole second half either, and they had to sign Webb off us to get even close.
No wonder they are like shooting fish in a barrel to a bullshit artist like Rodgers
That is brilliant. If you forget Barcelona we've won the European Cup as many times as them
Just wow....
Someone's comparing players again.
Edit: Damn you Phurry.
Edit: Damn you Phurry.
Look at that list. Every single one of our players played better than the opposing one today.
Unless some rawkite reading this want to point out who played better out of them?
I honestly wouldn't take any of their team, not even Nutmeg Boy.
The league table and actual results doesn't matter if You post on RAWK.
Pennant > Ronaldo
Pennant > Ronaldo
This is the problem with us squandering chance after chance at OT against Liverpool. They fluke a goal back and 'lose valiantly' due to a dodgy ref/bad luck/poor pitch and then delude themselves into thinking the two squads are similar in quality. They're miles apart.
I love stuff like that
"If you ignore the 70 minutes they completely dominated us and the five goals it could've gone either way really"
Wouldn't have been different if we'd won 5-0. They'd still bring up the exact same stuff.
Tbf, the second half was close and our substitutions were very defensive to close the game out.
So you're agreeing with him, yes? We bossed the first half completely, the second half was theirs but only just, and only really because we did a Fergie and just did enough to see it out (defensive tactics, leg-saving substitutions, energy-saving style of play).
So Rodgers is having a laugh. If this had been the last game of the season for us and there was nothing to lose, we would have gone out for the second half the same way we went out for the first and won 4-0.
24 points between the two teams and their first 11 is better, even Einstein couldn't come up with an explanation
To be fair, they got the defeat they deserved. One fecking shot on target in 94 minutes versus all the chances and shots on goal we had means the win was the least we deserved.
Sturridge did have a chance at the end when all that pinball was occuring in the box. That was close.
Mate they get excited by a bit of game raising which naturally follows getting a goal back and think it means they were the better side.
It was a largely comfortable win except for the Sturridge chance which he hilariously messed up because is isn't a truly top class player.
Yeah but compare that to us first half
Welbeck messing up two good chances, RVP with the first time finish attempt that went over, Cleverley's excellent left peg volley, RVP flick off the line, the penalty we should have had for the push. Second half Kagawa forcing the save from Reina, versus one chance for Sturridge and a couple of swipes into the side netting that De Gea had well covered.
Quite a few have turned on Joe Allen and Rodgers.
The 'group' is beginning to separate over on RAWK
The 'group' is beginning to separate over on RAWK
Still need to register to look at it?
Always amazes me how on RAWK they "quite clearly" have an even team as compared to ours yet finish 20+ points off us.
I'm not agreeing with him, just saying they improved when they brought Sturridge on and shaded the second half. Yep it could have been out of sight in the first , particularly if Welbeck was remotely clinical, but I'm sure most fans were happy to hear the final whistle.
He's right though, they are 34 points behind in that.
- Status