Rasmus Hojlund image 9

Rasmus Hojlund Denmark flag

2024-25 Performances


View full 2024-25 profile

5.1 Season Average Rating
Appearances
26
Goals
7
Assists
1
Yellow cards
1
- Good pass to Garnacho, who should have scored.
- Good shot from an acute angle, which the goalkeeper only just saves.
- Should have finished better from the edge of the box.
- Better at holding on to the ball than Zirkzee.
- Much more in-game than Zirkzee.
 
Hopefully we don’t revert back to starting him just because of one bad result. I view sidelining Hojlund as absolutely critical to our chances of looking a coherent team this season. Zirkzee might not be the long-term answer but he’s a far more gifted player.
Just not true is it though
 
He at least tried to do something, not a good game at all, but still managed to be a lot better than Zirkzee, but then he start the next game and again will look totally lost
 
Our best striker by a distance I would say.
Which is not the answer in any way.

What we have seen since Amorim has come on is neither Hojlund or Zirkzee are even remotely good enough to take us further.

We need to stop saying well he's better than someone else who isn't good enough and instead concentrate on getting a player good enough.

I trust Amorim will rectify this in January as it's probably our biggest need.

A top striker will win you games and we don't have one
 
Which is not the answer in any way.

What we have seen since Amorim has come on is neither Hojlund or Zirkzee are even remotely good enough to take us further.

We need to stop saying well he's better than someone else who isn't good enough and instead concentrate on getting a player good enough.

I trust Amorim will rectify this in January as it's probably our biggest need.

A top striker will win you games and we don't have one
That's fair enough but for now he should be out pick.

It is unlikely we would spend big on a striker anyway, and there are other positions that will be looked at first.
 
The January market can be difficult, so there is a real chance we don’t bring in a top quality striker. In that “lesser evil” situation, it’s Højlund as the starter for me.
 
Probably our most hopeful prospect. Strong as an ox, never gets beaten in a one on one duel, good movement, good link up play, deadly finisher. What doesn't he do well?
 
The Hojland criticism on this thread really winds me up. Not that he's above criticism, he's far from perfect, but many here take it too far.

He's got to work on his positioning and teamwork when it comes to receiving passes. It's a massive weak point in his game.

But he's already shown to be a potentially elite level finisher, strong in the challenge, and capable of better than decent holdup play.

He's 21. Not starting 9 quality for a team like united yet, but objectively has the potential to be
 
Being Danish I am probably a bit biased but I think that Højlund has proven that he has potential and is a lethal finisher. If he was missing sitters in every game and otherwise just walking around the pitch like he couldn’t care less, then I could understand the criticism, but that is not the case.
Even Haaland would struggle in this United team.
 
Probably our most hopeful prospect. Strong as an ox, never gets beaten in a one on one duel, good movement, good link up play, deadly finisher. What doesn't he do well


Being Danish I am probably a bit biased but I think that Højlund has proven that he has potential and is a lethal finisher. If he was missing sitters in every game and otherwise just walking around the pitch like he couldn’t care less, then I could understand the criticism, but that is not the case.
Even Haaland would struggle in this United team.
If he was missing sitters I'd be fine with it as it shows he has the right instincts and you can work on finishing.

You can't work on instincts and being in the right place though. He just doesn't have it
 
If he was missing sitters I'd be fine with it as it shows he has the right instincts and you can work on finishing.

You can't work on instincts and being in the right place though. He just doesn't have it
I think his instinct and movement are great - he just "has" it - the unteachable.
The only thing he doesn't have is service and sometimes his passing and knowledge of where others are isn't great yet.
 
Should score more, but if Bruno and Garnacho wasn't incredibly shit at finishing he'd have two great assists over the last two games. Do we need better? Definitely, but is he among the biggest problems? Definitely not
 
I don’t particularly rate him, but it is absolutely bonkers to not be starting with him in every match at the moment.
 
Not starting level for a team like United? Honestly. Starting level for United at the moment is not really a level to aim for. Højlund is way too good to start for us right now. He should at least be starting striker in a top ten club. The problem is located at the service desk. The best service in the last two games came from the guy, who should be at the receiving end of such passes. That is a shame. Rasmus would most likely have scored the goals that Bruno and Garnacho did not, but he can´t be the one to set himself up. If that IS the idea, he should demand the salary of those two employees for doing their work. If he had scored, this forum would have made him the GOAT by six o´clock making this post obsolete. By the way. What is the idea of playing Dalot as a left wingback? I don´t get it. It feels like playing Gandalfs cousin - "YOU SHALL NOT CROSS!"



(This post may contain sarcasm)
 
- Good pass to Garnacho, who should have scored.
- Good shot from an acute angle, which the goalkeeper only just saves.
- Should have finished better from the edge of the box.
- Better at holding on to the ball than Zirkzee.
- Much more in-game than Zirkzee.
Absolutely agree

Looked far far better going forward when he came on. Zirkzee is nowhere near the level to be a lone striker for us, all he can do is the odd relief for Hoj in dead rubber games or as a sub id say.

Hojlunds all round play has come on nicely since Amorim has come in and Im encouraged by his improvement. If we were a bit more dominant in games at home he would be getting more chances, but now importantly he's actually getting involved in the build up and provided Bruno and Garnacho with golden opportunities in the past couple of games.
 
He doesn't have the natural instinct that all good strikers have, where they just seem to be more often than not, in the right place at the right time. We've seen it with Ronaldo, Ruud, Ole, Cole. Even Cavani in his spell here, his off the ball movement was brilliant, even Ibra, he barely ran when he was here but once in the box his movement was excellent. Not sure they can be fully taught, but it has to be improved. You can criticize the service he gets, you can reference his inexperience, which are valid points, but we are seeing crosses come in more now where he is nowhere near them.
I mean, you’ve mentioned Ibra… not sure if he had that ability early on, it was all about ball control, dribbling and fancy shots with him. Or look at someone like Cristiano. It certainly something can be massively improved upon.
 
Some of the reactions after the game are great examples of peoples’ twisted impressions.

Apart from two or three times Højlund held the ball well and passed it on to a teammate. One of those passes should’ve gotten him an assist.
He had a very precise and hard shot that only just were saved.
He didn’t hit the ball well the second time, so now people blame him for not passing to the very wasteful player on his left who’s failed to pass to Hojlund countless times. We’ve called for him to shoot more and being more selfish. The first time in ages he complies people instantly get on his back. Well, guess what: If he starts shooting more often and from less advantageous positions (which I agree he must as he’s by far our most clinical finisher), he’s also going to miss a few. No one hits the ball perfectly every time and a ratio of one excellent shot in two tries is fine.

I don’t want to contribute to the Zirkzee bashing and I’ve defended them both, but it’s obvious to everyone with eyes and a bit of football knowledge that Hojlund is and should be our primary striker atm and in this system. Anyone who claims otherwise has an agenda pro Zirkzee or con Hojlund.
 
We need to stop saying well he's better than someone else who isn't good enough and instead concentrate on getting a player good enough.
I don’t think posters here are employed in our scouting department so relax - I’m sure the mental resources used on writing the short sentence you replied to are not affecting their work.
 
The Hojland criticism on this thread really winds me up. Not that he's above criticism, he's far from perfect, but many here take it too far.

He's got to work on his positioning and teamwork when it comes to receiving passes. It's a massive weak point in his game.

But he's already shown to be a potentially elite level finisher, strong in the challenge, and capable of better than decent holdup play.

He's 21. Not starting 9 quality for a team like united yet, but objectively has the potential to be
Spot on
 
Hopefully we don’t revert back to starting him just because of one bad result. I view sidelining Hojlund as absolutely critical to our chances of looking a coherent team this season. Zirkzee might not be the long-term answer but he’s a far more gifted player.
An absolutely staggering take and it really makes me wonder do some of our fans actually watch or understand the game.

What exactly does Zirkzee do or offer that makes you suggest we play him in favour of a player who can hold the ball up, energetically presses and is scoring goals? Hojlund has a lot to work on, but he offers a number of things now that we can work with, and we are a much more dangerous team when he plays. Zirkzeee offers absolutely nothing. And I don't want to hear about him doing nice layoffs or picking a pass on the halfway line because that is not the role of the 9 in this team. His best contributions this season have been his cameos at 10, which are utterly irrelevant to the above sentiment.
 
Last edited:
Some of the reactions after the game are great examples of peoples’ twisted impressions.

Apart from two or three times Højlund held the ball well and passed it on to a teammate. One of those passes should’ve gotten him an assist.
He had a very precise and hard shot that only just were saved.
He didn’t hit the ball well the second time, so now people blame him for not passing to the very wasteful player on his left who’s failed to pass to Hojlund countless times. We’ve called for him to shoot more and being more selfish. The first time in ages he complies people instantly get on his back. Well, guess what: If he starts shooting more often and from less advantageous positions (which I agree he must as he’s by far our most clinical finisher), he’s also going to miss a few. No one hits the ball perfectly every time and a ratio of one excellent shot in two tries is fine.

I don’t want to contribute to the Zirkzee bashing and I’ve defended them both, but it’s obvious to everyone with eyes and a bit of football knowledge that Hojlund is and should be our primary striker atm and in this system. Anyone who claims otherwise has an agenda pro Zirkzee or con Hojlund.
Completely agree. Coming after Højlund with the played out WWE jokes after yesterdays cameo is so dumb, when he actually did fairly well bar one wrong decision, and significantly outperformed the guy he replaced.

Everyone recognizes we need something better, but that doesn't mean everything he does is shit.
 
He is Lukaku lite version, but still way better than Zirkzee. Stop playing Zirkzee up top.
 
If he was missing sitters I'd be fine with it as it shows he has the right instincts and you can work on finishing.

You can't work on instincts and being in the right place though. He just doesn't have it

That's a lie and we all know it.
 
Which is not the answer in any way.

What we have seen since Amorim has come on is neither Hojlund or Zirkzee are even remotely good enough to take us further.

We need to stop saying well he's better than someone else who isn't good enough and instead concentrate on getting a player good enough.

I trust Amorim will rectify this in January as it's probably our biggest need.

A top striker will win you games and we don't have one

We definitely don’t need to stop that until after we sign someone that’s better than both of them. Which definitely won’t happen until January, probably not until late summer. And possibly not at all. So it’s a discussion that is very much live right now, in December.
 
I haven't watched as many games this season as I usually would, but the games I watch it feels like Hojlund has a very ropey first touch and can't handle the ball under pressure/show good holdup play.

Our entire forward line is misfiring so it's not all him, but I cant help but think that his potential level isn't high enough for what we need
 
I haven't watched as many games this season as I usually would, but the games I watch it feels like Hojlund has a very ropey first touch and can't handle the ball under pressure/show good holdup play.

Our entire forward line is misfiring so it's not all him, but I cant help but think that his potential level isn't high enough for what we need
It’s inconsistent, yes, but just last game his hold up play was excellent. No reason to believe he can’t reach the level needed.
 
We have to start him if we are only playing one up top as Zirkzee is simply not fast enough.
I have seen no improvement since he came to the club but I live in hope.
 
Come on guys let's hear the excuses why he looked like a donkey against Wolves? Have we still got to wait until he turns 25 before we can judge him meanwhile we have to pretend he's going to transform into the next Harry Kane
 
And repeat.

Standard Rasmus, not a threat, not involved in the game, technically poor.

Zirkzee main purpose is to make Hojlund look better than he is.
 
absolute rubbish, he’s never looked good enough and never will be.

Another overpriced nobody we got scammed on.