And where exactly is it reported that we've listened to Fletcher over Rangnick?
Rangnick has already said he thinks ETH should be next manager and it looks like that will be the case, so wtf are you on about? Just seems like a needless stick to beat the club with no basis.
Most football directors are former players who when they entered the role had no former experience. To draw a very literal parallel Petr Cech holds the exact same position at Chelsea, do you intimately know his role and how he has done?It isn't a needless stick though is it? we've got a fecking nobody in Darren Fletcher who's suddenly a coach/sporting director/assistant manager/go-to between manager and players making decisions for the club it's a farce.
Ragnick's role (or lack off after this season) to one side what the feck is Fletcher doing at United? he's gone from gaining his coaching badges 12 months ago to being 3rd in command the club is a mess.
Most football directors are former players who when they entered the role had no former experience. To draw a very literal parallel Petr Cech holds the exact same position at Chelsea, do you intimately know his role and how he has done?
smart man if true, seen up close what a facade the club isWell, that's that then. Good for him I guess. Its fairly clear that we have little intention of taking his ideas forwards. He may as well get another job. At least then we can draw a line under the whole charade of his 'consultancy.'
Welcome to United under the Glazers.This would be strange. We'd have hired him for a role he's not known to be really good at just to deny him the role he's actually good at.
Any stats to show that 'most' football directors are former players and had 'no former experience'. Michael Edwards, the highly respected Liverpool DoF, stopped playing years ago and had worked in player analysis at several clubs, before moving to same role at Liverpool, then ultimately becoming DOF. Emanalo at Chelsea also widely respected. stopped playing in 2000, then went into coaching and became Technical director at Tuscon in 2006, then joined scouting team at Chelsea in 2007. Progressed to first team coach in 2010, then technical director in 2011. Show me where Fletcher had any relevant experience at all for his role, any? Whatever he may become, its a joke to have given this job to Fletcher. Butt left under a cloud after proving himself as a youth coach. Fletcher should earn his position.Most football directors are former players who when they entered the role had no former experience. To draw a very literal parallel Petr Cech holds the exact same position at Chelsea, do you intimately know his role and how he has done?
I mean if his job is just to give interviews about United and tell the obvious that everyone already knows anyway then it doesn’t matter if he is doing it while employed by United or the Austrian FA.
I actually thought (don’t know why) that he was brought for the much harder stuff such as actually helping United implement a new structure (in terms of recruitment, style of play, etc.). This includes convincing our board of certain changes. Of course they are not easy people to work with, if they were we wouldn’t be in this mess. But I thought it would be exactly Ralf’s role to (slowly) help with changes.
The poster you're responding to made the comparison with Petr Cech who is the technical director at Chelsea. And he's been working with Marina Garanovskaia who is the person who was brought to Chelsea by Abramovich to head the football operations at the club. And even though she didn't come from a football background, she's doing a good job by all accounts, and Cech assists her.Any stats to show that 'most' football directors are former players and had 'no former experience'. Michael Edwards, the highly respected Liverpool DoF, stopped playing years ago and had worked in player analysis at several clubs, before moving to same role at Liverpool, then ultimately becoming DOF. Emanalo at Chelsea also widely respected. stopped playing in 2000, then went into coaching and became Technical director at Tuscon in 2006, then joined scouting team at Chelsea in 2007. Progressed to first team coach in 2010, then technical director in 2011. Show me where Fletcher had any relevant experience at all for his role, any? Whatever he may become, its a joke to have given this job to Fletcher. Butt left under a cloud after proving himself as a youth coach. Fletcher should earn his position.
This would be strange. We'd have hired him for a role he's not known to be really good at just to deny him the role he's actually good at.
This would be strange. We'd have hired him for a role he's not known to be really good at just to deny him the role he's actually good at.
Ralfs not the problem, the players are the problem. Why is the dressing room divided? Seems to have happened since Ronaldo arrived.
last year finishing 2nd was decent season, this year shocking… why.
Same deal as Cavani, then?
Any stats to show that 'most' football directors are former players and had 'no former experience'. Michael Edwards, the highly respected Liverpool DoF, stopped playing years ago and had worked in player analysis at several clubs, before moving to same role at Liverpool, then ultimately becoming DOF. Emanalo at Chelsea also widely respected. stopped playing in 2000, then went into coaching and became Technical director at Tuscon in 2006, then joined scouting team at Chelsea in 2007. Progressed to first team coach in 2010, then technical director in 2011. Show me where Fletcher had any relevant experience at all for his role, any? Whatever he may become, its a joke to have given this job to Fletcher. Butt left under a cloud after proving himself as a youth coach. Fletcher should earn his position.
Very well put, good post.Cech is Chelsea's technical director just under a slightly different job title, point to where he had the relevant experience?
Monchi became Sevilla’s Sporting Director immediately after he retired as their goalkeeper.
Tixiki Begiristain retired, became a commentator and then 3 years later became the DoF at Barcelona.
Michael Zorc became sporting director at Dortmund immediately after retiring in 1998.
Hasan Salihamidžić retired in 2012 knocked around as a pundit and then became sporting director at Bayern in 2017.
Before going into management Zidane was appointed as advisor to the president at Real Madrid in 2009 and was one of the key decision makers alongside along with general director Jorge Valdano and sporting director Miguel Pardeza.
It's really quite a common occurrence that former players take up key roles in important positions in top top clubs.
Your comparison to Michael Edwards is akin to the journey and promotion of Murtough. Michael Edwards and the team he was a part of were in no way revered before he took that position.
I misspoke saying 'most', but come on, it's enough.
I'm not sure who's worse - the players, the board or some of the fans.
"Ralf is saying the same things we and previous managers have been saying for years - what a clown". Yeah - the same problems have been consistent for a decade and its the guy who came in 4 months ago who's the clown.
"He's been a disaster as a manager - get rid". We hired a non specialist manager, to come in as interim until a proper manager could be hired in the summer. The whole idea was that Ralf could get to grips with the job in hand and have a better idea of the big picture when he stepped upstairs to consult above the new manager. If we get rid of him now - that whole process was for nothing and the new guy comes in, to restart the exact same cycle with the exact same core squad of spoofers that have let down the last 4 managers.
"He should've started Rashford". An injury crisis doesn't negate several months worth of shocking performance, shocking attitude and enough PR spin to make Alaistair Campbell blush. Sometimes setting an example is more important than 3 points in a season that's already circling the drain.
"The players aren't listening to him anymore". Then get rid of the players - simple as. How many managers need to come in and say the same things until we stop giving them the benefit of the doubt?
I'm pretty much resigned to the idea that we're looking down the barrel of at least another 20 years of Liverpoolesque languishing in the wilderness, because I just don't see a route back under this ownership. I fully expect them to let Rangnick leave in the summer, to give lads like Shaw and Rashford new contracts and to start another bullshit cycle of half measures where in 10 months time, we'll all be arguing about how useless Ten Hag / Poch / [Insert Name Here] are.
The one glimmer of hope would come by keeping Ralf on in the role he was intended for, listening to his analysis of what it is we need and allowing him, along with the new coach to create a plan for how we move forward. Then recruiting players who fit that plan and ruthlessly shipping out those who don't. I'm talking cutting 12-15 players from the squad this summer.
It won't happen obviously - it's completely unrealistic. But in 10 years time, when we're looking back at another decade without a title, we'll all look back and say that's what should've happened.
Finally, some sense. Thank you sir.Cech is Chelsea's technical director just under a slightly different job title, point to where he had the relevant experience?
Monchi became Sevilla’s Sporting Director immediately after he retired as their goalkeeper.
Tixiki Begiristain retired, became a commentator and then 3 years later became the DoF at Barcelona.
Michael Zorc became sporting director at Dortmund immediately after retiring in 1998.
Hasan Salihamidžić retired in 2012 knocked around as a pundit and then became sporting director at Bayern in 2017.
Before going into management Zidane was appointed as advisor to the president at Real Madrid in 2009 and was one of the key decision makers alongside along with general director Jorge Valdano and sporting director Miguel Pardeza.
It's really quite a common occurrence that former players take up key roles in important positions in top top clubs.
Your comparison to Michael Edwards is akin to the journey and promotion of Murtough. Michael Edwards and the team he was a part of were in no way revered before he took that position.
I misspoke saying 'most', but come on, it's enough.
Agree with this, however there could potentially be indirect leverage… those two owning 40% of the shares outstanding is a sizable amount and enough to cause a ruckus if they were so inclined. Normally those types of holdings come with a seat on the board and as such would be informed of succession planning when a CEO steps down. Most real companies have a succession plan in place for top execs anyhow, well before any turnover.They do, and as far as I know the Glazer family are far and away the largest shareholders with the most votes. Their class B shares have ten times the voting weight versus the class A shares that are available publicly, giving the family around 75% control. So while it's great for institutional investors like Ariel and Lindsell Train that they own over 10 million class A shares each, they don't appear to have sufficient weight to seriously influence decision making at United.
Massive respect for Rangnick and what he has done in short time at the club. Its been an almost impossible task with this toxic group of players and the constant media/social media leaks on pretty much a daily basis since.
He comes across a good guy, but has had his hands tied from day one.
Hope whoever the new manager is he gets authority to make decisions and isnt simply a puppet for the marketing model Man utd have become
The board have brought in a long term specialist and asked him to deliver short term.Laughable that people still defend this guy.
Conte is doing far more with less at Spurs.
That's not to say I would want Conte but it just shows how badly Rangnick is doing.
Having not coached much in the last 10 years he's out of touch with the modern game and it really shows.
Not really. Rangnick can still be a consultant at United if he's coach of Austria's national team. A consultancy job can be done alongside almost anything else that's not all-consuming - and being the coach of a national team certainly isn't.Another case of player power winning? Stories came up as how Rashford wont sign the contract if Rangnick is involved with the club. Then this news popped up.
Not really. Rangnick can still be a consultant at United if he's coach of Austria's national team. A consultancy job can be done alongside almost anything else that's not all-consuming - and being the coach of a national team certainly isn't.
In fact, it makes sense that Rangnick is getting another job in the summer, cause if consultant would be his only work, he'd probably be sitting on his hands most of the time.
It depends a bit on the actual job I guess - but given United have a full hierarchy already, it wouldn't make sense if Rangnick would be doing this full-time.Not many people understand what consultants do and the time it affords.
It depends a bit on the actual job I guess - but given United have a full hierarchy already, it wouldn't make sense if Rangnick would be doing this full-time.
Agree with this, however there could potentially be indirect leverage… those two owning 40% of the shares outstanding is a sizable amount and enough to cause a ruckus if they were so inclined. Normally those types of holdings come with a seat on the board and as such would be informed of succession planning when a CEO steps down. Most real companies have a succession plan in place for top execs anyhow, well before any turnover.
‘Not sure how we got here… I think it was in reference to how many of the decisions post Woody’s announcement are actually Arnold’s…
The recruitment department sounds as clueless as its proved, thescouts dont seemingly go far