Ralf Rangnick | ex-interim manager | does anyone rate him?

Status
Not open for further replies.
This would be strange. We'd have hired him for a role he's not known to be really good at just to deny him the role he's actually good at.
 
And where exactly is it reported that we've listened to Fletcher over Rangnick?

Rangnick has already said he thinks ETH should be next manager and it looks like that will be the case, so wtf are you on about? Just seems like a needless stick to beat the club with no basis.


It isn't a needless stick though is it? we've got a fecking nobody in Darren Fletcher who's suddenly a coach/sporting director/assistant manager/go-to between manager and players making decisions for the club it's a farce.

Ragnick's role (or lack off after this season) to one side what the feck is Fletcher doing at United? he's gone from gaining his coaching badges 12 months ago to being 3rd in command the club is a mess. Fletcher will be a major factor in the next manager being appointed whilst Ragnick probably wont even be at the club because the reported job he's been offered wont be accepted he will take a DoF role at another club, rumours today that Austria are going to offer him the national vaccancy.
 
Last edited:
It isn't a needless stick though is it? we've got a fecking nobody in Darren Fletcher who's suddenly a coach/sporting director/assistant manager/go-to between manager and players making decisions for the club it's a farce.

Ragnick's role (or lack off after this season) to one side what the feck is Fletcher doing at United? he's gone from gaining his coaching badges 12 months ago to being 3rd in command the club is a mess.
Most football directors are former players who when they entered the role had no former experience. To draw a very literal parallel Petr Cech holds the exact same position at Chelsea, do you intimately know his role and how he has done?
 
Most football directors are former players who when they entered the role had no former experience. To draw a very literal parallel Petr Cech holds the exact same position at Chelsea, do you intimately know his role and how he has done?


I bet he's not taking part in training sessions and getting yellow cards on the touchline whilst shouting out instructions to the players that's for sure. Imagine Cech pulling a 'Fletcher' with Tuchel in charge....yeah right.
 
Well, that's that then. Good for him I guess. Its fairly clear that we have little intention of taking his ideas forwards. He may as well get another job. At least then we can draw a line under the whole charade of his 'consultancy.'
smart man if true, seen up close what a facade the club is
 
Most football directors are former players who when they entered the role had no former experience. To draw a very literal parallel Petr Cech holds the exact same position at Chelsea, do you intimately know his role and how he has done?
Any stats to show that 'most' football directors are former players and had 'no former experience'. Michael Edwards, the highly respected Liverpool DoF, stopped playing years ago and had worked in player analysis at several clubs, before moving to same role at Liverpool, then ultimately becoming DOF. Emanalo at Chelsea also widely respected. stopped playing in 2000, then went into coaching and became Technical director at Tuscon in 2006, then joined scouting team at Chelsea in 2007. Progressed to first team coach in 2010, then technical director in 2011. Show me where Fletcher had any relevant experience at all for his role, any? Whatever he may become, its a joke to have given this job to Fletcher. Butt left under a cloud after proving himself as a youth coach. Fletcher should earn his position.
 
I mean if his job is just to give interviews about United and tell the obvious that everyone already knows anyway then it doesn’t matter if he is doing it while employed by United or the Austrian FA.

I actually thought (don’t know why) that he was brought for the much harder stuff such as actually helping United implement a new structure (in terms of recruitment, style of play, etc.). This includes convincing our board of certain changes. Of course they are not easy people to work with, if they were we wouldn’t be in this mess. But I thought it would be exactly Ralf’s role to (slowly) help with changes.
 
I mean if his job is just to give interviews about United and tell the obvious that everyone already knows anyway then it doesn’t matter if he is doing it while employed by United or the Austrian FA.

I actually thought (don’t know why) that he was brought for the much harder stuff such as actually helping United implement a new structure (in terms of recruitment, style of play, etc.). This includes convincing our board of certain changes. Of course they are not easy people to work with, if they were we wouldn’t be in this mess. But I thought it would be exactly Ralf’s role to (slowly) help with changes.

What we need from him is consultation regarding coaching quality improvement and assurance for the entire club to improve the academy coaching side, as well as access to key contacts for recruitment in the transfer market
 
Any stats to show that 'most' football directors are former players and had 'no former experience'. Michael Edwards, the highly respected Liverpool DoF, stopped playing years ago and had worked in player analysis at several clubs, before moving to same role at Liverpool, then ultimately becoming DOF. Emanalo at Chelsea also widely respected. stopped playing in 2000, then went into coaching and became Technical director at Tuscon in 2006, then joined scouting team at Chelsea in 2007. Progressed to first team coach in 2010, then technical director in 2011. Show me where Fletcher had any relevant experience at all for his role, any? Whatever he may become, its a joke to have given this job to Fletcher. Butt left under a cloud after proving himself as a youth coach. Fletcher should earn his position.
The poster you're responding to made the comparison with Petr Cech who is the technical director at Chelsea. And he's been working with Marina Garanovskaia who is the person who was brought to Chelsea by Abramovich to head the football operations at the club. And even though she didn't come from a football background, she's doing a good job by all accounts, and Cech assists her.

And the likes of Edwards and Emanalo can't be compared to Fletcher because their remit is/was to oversee the entire football operations side of their clubs. Fletcher's role is different, and he's assisting on the football side of the club, similar to what Cech is doing at Chelsea. But it's important we're not confused by Fletcher's title and actually look into what his job description is. And for me Fletcher is a good addition that has the potential to learn and grow into a more significant figure in the future. Petr Cech, Sebastian Kehl and Marco Neppe are being groomed for bigger things at Chelsea, BvB and Bayern.
 
Ralfs not the problem, the players are the problem. Why is the dressing room divided? Seems to have happened since Ronaldo arrived.
last year finishing 2nd was decent season, this year shocking… why.
 
He is not a superb manager, but is someone good at directing a club and identifying the problems (which he has done going by statements, its now upto board to listen and act).
 
This would be strange. We'd have hired him for a role he's not known to be really good at just to deny him the role he's actually good at.

I mean, if you're aware of our Board's past decisions it wouldn't be that strange
 


Clarification: There was no meeting between ÖFB sports director Peter Schöttel and Ralf Rangnick, coach of
@ManUtd
 
Ralfs not the problem, the players are the problem. Why is the dressing room divided? Seems to have happened since Ronaldo arrived.
last year finishing 2nd was decent season, this year shocking… why.

Ronaldo wants to win and expects the best from the team. We have a slew of players who clearly cant be arsed.
 
Any stats to show that 'most' football directors are former players and had 'no former experience'. Michael Edwards, the highly respected Liverpool DoF, stopped playing years ago and had worked in player analysis at several clubs, before moving to same role at Liverpool, then ultimately becoming DOF. Emanalo at Chelsea also widely respected. stopped playing in 2000, then went into coaching and became Technical director at Tuscon in 2006, then joined scouting team at Chelsea in 2007. Progressed to first team coach in 2010, then technical director in 2011. Show me where Fletcher had any relevant experience at all for his role, any? Whatever he may become, its a joke to have given this job to Fletcher. Butt left under a cloud after proving himself as a youth coach. Fletcher should earn his position.

Cech is Chelsea's technical director just under a slightly different job title, point to where he had the relevant experience?

Monchi became Sevilla’s Sporting Director immediately after he retired as their goalkeeper.

Tixiki Begiristain retired, became a commentator and then 3 years later became the DoF at Barcelona.

Michael Zorc became sporting director at Dortmund immediately after retiring in 1998.

Hasan Salihamidžić retired in 2012 knocked around as a pundit and then became sporting director at Bayern in 2017.

Before going into management Zidane was appointed as advisor to the president at Real Madrid in 2009 and was one of the key decision makers alongside along with general director Jorge Valdano and sporting director Miguel Pardeza.

It's really quite a common occurrence that former players take up key roles in important positions in top top clubs.

Your comparison to Michael Edwards is akin to the journey and promotion of Murtough. Michael Edwards and the team he was a part of were in no way revered before he took that position.

I misspoke saying 'most', but come on, it's enough.

Fletcher's role is to oversee the connection and pathways between first team and the academy. It is telling that Rooney said that when Jose was there 'the distance between first team and the academy was huge, it was almost like the academy didn't exist'. So obviously that means there is a necessity for someone to manage and close that distance.
 
Last edited:
Cech is Chelsea's technical director just under a slightly different job title, point to where he had the relevant experience?

Monchi became Sevilla’s Sporting Director immediately after he retired as their goalkeeper.

Tixiki Begiristain retired, became a commentator and then 3 years later became the DoF at Barcelona.

Michael Zorc became sporting director at Dortmund immediately after retiring in 1998.

Hasan Salihamidžić retired in 2012 knocked around as a pundit and then became sporting director at Bayern in 2017.

Before going into management Zidane was appointed as advisor to the president at Real Madrid in 2009 and was one of the key decision makers alongside along with general director Jorge Valdano and sporting director Miguel Pardeza.

It's really quite a common occurrence that former players take up key roles in important positions in top top clubs.

Your comparison to Michael Edwards is akin to the journey and promotion of Murtough. Michael Edwards and the team he was a part of were in no way revered before he took that position.

I misspoke saying 'most', but come on, it's enough.
Very well put, good post.
 
I'm not sure who's worse - the players, the board or some of the fans.

"Ralf is saying the same things we and previous managers have been saying for years - what a clown". Yeah - the same problems have been consistent for a decade and its the guy who came in 4 months ago who's the clown.

"He's been a disaster as a manager - get rid". We hired a non specialist manager, to come in as interim until a proper manager could be hired in the summer. The whole idea was that Ralf could get to grips with the job in hand and have a better idea of the big picture when he stepped upstairs to consult above the new manager. If we get rid of him now - that whole process was for nothing and the new guy comes in, to restart the exact same cycle with the exact same core squad of spoofers that have let down the last 4 managers.

"He should've started Rashford". An injury crisis doesn't negate several months worth of shocking performance, shocking attitude and enough PR spin to make Alaistair Campbell blush. Sometimes setting an example is more important than 3 points in a season that's already circling the drain.

"The players aren't listening to him anymore". Then get rid of the players - simple as. How many managers need to come in and say the same things until we stop giving them the benefit of the doubt?

I'm pretty much resigned to the idea that we're looking down the barrel of at least another 20 years of Liverpoolesque languishing in the wilderness, because I just don't see a route back under this ownership. I fully expect them to let Rangnick leave in the summer, to give lads like Shaw and Rashford new contracts and to start another bullshit cycle of half measures where in 10 months time, we'll all be arguing about how useless Ten Hag / Poch / [Insert Name Here] are.

The one glimmer of hope would come by keeping Ralf on in the role he was intended for, listening to his analysis of what it is we need and allowing him, along with the new coach to create a plan for how we move forward. Then recruiting players who fit that plan and ruthlessly shipping out those who don't. I'm talking cutting 12-15 players from the squad this summer.

It won't happen obviously - it's completely unrealistic. But in 10 years time, when we're looking back at another decade without a title, we'll all look back and say that's what should've happened.

The fans blaming the manager are as delusional as the board who've fecked it up for a decade.
 
Cech is Chelsea's technical director just under a slightly different job title, point to where he had the relevant experience?

Monchi became Sevilla’s Sporting Director immediately after he retired as their goalkeeper.

Tixiki Begiristain retired, became a commentator and then 3 years later became the DoF at Barcelona.

Michael Zorc became sporting director at Dortmund immediately after retiring in 1998.

Hasan Salihamidžić retired in 2012 knocked around as a pundit and then became sporting director at Bayern in 2017.

Before going into management Zidane was appointed as advisor to the president at Real Madrid in 2009 and was one of the key decision makers alongside along with general director Jorge Valdano and sporting director Miguel Pardeza.

It's really quite a common occurrence that former players take up key roles in important positions in top top clubs.

Your comparison to Michael Edwards is akin to the journey and promotion of Murtough. Michael Edwards and the team he was a part of were in no way revered before he took that position.

I misspoke saying 'most', but come on, it's enough.
Finally, some sense. Thank you sir.
 
I'm almost certain now that the players know whether they're the ones who're certain to stay past this season and the ones who're are not, obviously outside of the ones who's contracts are up in the summer.

With 8 'cup finals' to go, you'd expect, even with the complete disaster this season has been, that the players could restore some pride and actually motivate themselves for that precious top 4 finish, but no.

The only guys who are atleast putting in the effort are Fred, Bruno and Elanga. The quality is lacking in all 3 at times this season but I don't doubt the work ethic.
The others couldn't give a flying feck ! because they know they're out.
 
Massive respect for Rangnick and what he has done in short time at the club. Its been an almost impossible task with this toxic group of players and the constant media/social media leaks on pretty much a daily basis since.

He comes across a good guy, but has had his hands tied from day one.

Hope whoever the new manager is he gets authority to make decisions and isnt simply a puppet for the marketing model Man utd have become
 
They do, and as far as I know the Glazer family are far and away the largest shareholders with the most votes. Their class B shares have ten times the voting weight versus the class A shares that are available publicly, giving the family around 75% control. So while it's great for institutional investors like Ariel and Lindsell Train that they own over 10 million class A shares each, they don't appear to have sufficient weight to seriously influence decision making at United.
Agree with this, however there could potentially be indirect leverage… those two owning 40% of the shares outstanding is a sizable amount and enough to cause a ruckus if they were so inclined. Normally those types of holdings come with a seat on the board and as such would be informed of succession planning when a CEO steps down. Most real companies have a succession plan in place for top execs anyhow, well before any turnover.

‘Not sure how we got here… I think it was in reference to how many of the decisions post Woody’s announcement are actually Arnold’s…
 
Massive respect for Rangnick and what he has done in short time at the club. Its been an almost impossible task with this toxic group of players and the constant media/social media leaks on pretty much a daily basis since.

He comes across a good guy, but has had his hands tied from day one.

Hope whoever the new manager is he gets authority to make decisions and isnt simply a puppet for the marketing model Man utd have become

Sorry for asking, but what EXACTLY did he do ? Because I can't seem to comprehend what he did to make us better on the pitch, where it matters.
I get the fact that Utd are impossible to manage and all the other top teams out there are a piece of cake to manage. I get the fact that all we have are overpaid superstars, toxic viruses and other top teams have only professionals with an outstanding work ethic. I understand he is working blindfolded with his hands and feet tied, whereas other managers kick the door of big clubs, fill out a form with their demands and wait for their demands to be fulfilled.
I get the picture but I can't understand what did Ralf do right.
 
He had a contract at Lokomotiv. It honestly feels like the consultancy thing was just our way of reimbursing him for ending his contract in Russia, a way for us to pay him for 3 years instead of just 6 months.
 
A consultancy is rarely full time. I don't know why people imagined it would be full time. In his future role he doesn't need to be at the training ground. His role will be to advise the club on long-term strategy, and they don't talk about that every day. He'll likely be available one day a week to answer any questions, take on tasks they have. Then maybe fly into Manchester or London for 2-3 days once a month for a bunch of meetings to go over the progression since last month.

Leaving room for him to take on other roles at the same time.
 
Laughable that people still defend this guy.

Conte is doing far more with less at Spurs.

That's not to say I would want Conte but it just shows how badly Rangnick is doing.

Having not coached much in the last 10 years he's out of touch with the modern game and it really shows.
The board have brought in a long term specialist and asked him to deliver short term.

Poor planning again.
 
Another case of player power winning? Stories came up as how Rashford wont sign the contract if Rangnick is involved with the club. Then this news popped up.
Not really. Rangnick can still be a consultant at United if he's coach of Austria's national team. A consultancy job can be done alongside almost anything else that's not all-consuming - and being the coach of a national team certainly isn't.

In fact, it makes sense that Rangnick is getting another job in the summer, cause if consultant would be his only work, he'd probably be sitting on his hands most of the time.
 
Not really. Rangnick can still be a consultant at United if he's coach of Austria's national team. A consultancy job can be done alongside almost anything else that's not all-consuming - and being the coach of a national team certainly isn't.

In fact, it makes sense that Rangnick is getting another job in the summer, cause if consultant would be his only work, he'd probably be sitting on his hands most of the time.

Not many people understand what consultants do and the time it affords. Football, like most sports, is all about duplication. What makes teams successful and how can we implement those success to our own ways/approach.

Ralf has more than enough knowledge and actual experience within the club to know where he's going to provide input to Murtough and Fletcher. And Fletcher has been sitting right next to Rangnick every single match, so there's understanding and continuity there as they go into discussions with Murtough and then EtH or whoever.

And Ralf being an international club manager allows him to scout players and opponents, which is always a good way to suggest or reference some under the radar players. It's a no brainer.
 
Not many people understand what consultants do and the time it affords.
It depends a bit on the actual job I guess - but given United have a full hierarchy already, it wouldn't make sense if Rangnick would be doing this full-time.
 
It depends a bit on the actual job I guess - but given United have a full hierarchy already, it wouldn't make sense if Rangnick would be doing this full-time.

It doesn't make sense for him to do it full-time and his ground work and intel gathering has been going on since December. He knows what needs to be done and can share that with the powers that be, then chime in throughout the next few months. It's up to Murtough, Fletcher, and the rest to accept and implement his suggestions/ideas. That's always the case with consultancy.
 
Agree with this, however there could potentially be indirect leverage… those two owning 40% of the shares outstanding is a sizable amount and enough to cause a ruckus if they were so inclined. Normally those types of holdings come with a seat on the board and as such would be informed of succession planning when a CEO steps down. Most real companies have a succession plan in place for top execs anyhow, well before any turnover.

‘Not sure how we got here… I think it was in reference to how many of the decisions post Woody’s announcement are actually Arnold’s…

:lol: no worries @DSG. I agree that those two could have some leverage with the number of shares they have. Interesting discussion, thanks.
 




The recruitment department sounds as clueless as its proved, thescouts dont seemingly go far
 




The recruitment department sounds as clueless as its proved, thescouts dont seemingly go far

And someone heard this conversation and decided to tell Ogden about it. Sounds like utter made up nonsense, as bad as our recruitment dept are.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.