- Joined
- Sep 29, 2024
- Messages
- 172
The first promising match since Amorim arrived. Mostly good performances from the players, apart from de Ligt (i expected it, i don't see him as a very good signing anyway) and Mainoo. Bruno was very good.
So far he's had it easy, he(at times) got schooled today in his own gaff, that's why he's talking crap, he probably thought he'd be basking in the glow of a Liverpool cricket score. We'll see how good he is when he hits his first bump, and or Salah leaves.In his post match interview, Arne Slot claimed Liverpool dominated and had 75% of the game.
According to him, Utd just kicked the ball long and got a bit of luck.
.
I thought Mainoo was complete class. Made jones look invisible. Does so much in possession that doesn’t seem like much but creates space and angles to work the ball around.The first promising match since Amorim arrived. Mostly good performances from the players, apart from de Ligt (i expected it, i don't see him as a very good signing anyway) and Mainoo. Bruno was very good.
I’ll tell you what it is . Complete and utter tribe![]()
I still don’t get XG
Yeap. Both Amorim and Bruno said the same thing in their post-match, that they are not just happy, they are more angry that if this is how they can play, wtf was the last several weeks...I agree. Just need to build on it now. Please let’s get a bit of consistency now, especially against the so called lesser teams.
Obviously you start by deducting 0.9 or so from Liverpool for the penalty. Total coincidence.![]()
I still don’t get XG
Yup I wanted to be offside when he missed but looked back shoulder was on ffsHis right arm was offside. Goal would have counted.
Aye but it also ignores many factors like; who had the shot, a one legged blind man gives the same xg as peak RVN.... whether a shot falls to a right footed player on the wrong side of the goal or vice versa, it does not differentiate between a player like Lineker who pretty much scored all his goals within the 6 yard box is treated the same as a player like Paul Scholes who mostly scored from outside the area, a 16 year old defender making their debut or a 35 year old veteran who has never scored in 500 games, it does not account for recent form of the player who is shooting, it does not take into account the actual moment of a match i.e. the fatigue levels of a player, whether or not a team has already scored, whether a team has been building pressure, whether the keeper is having a worldie, the wind, the rain, the state of the pitch, the pace or quality of the pass, whether the ball bobbles etc.etc.etc.....Thats because it usually is broadly correct. No it doesn't tell you how much a team dominated. It doesn't tell you whether you put in 10 crosses that were 1 inch away from a tap in for your striker but its broadly correct and anyone saying otherwise is an idiot. Its literally statistics with massive datasets. Its not made up. Its not some bloke going "I reckon a player sticks that in the net about 3 times out of 10".
Better players will allow you to outperform your xG a bit and worse player will underperform. It simply tells us the overall quality of chance that were missed where a player had an attempt on goal. Its a useful metric. Its much more useful when you put it in the context of watching the game however if you care about anything more than pure goals...
Aye but it also ignores some many factors like; who had the shot, a one legged blind man gives the same xg as peak RVN.... whether a shot falls to a right footed player on the wrong side of the goal or vice versa, it does not differentiate between a player like Lineker who pretty much scored all his goals within the 6 yard box is treated the same as a player like Paul Scholes who mostly scored from outside the area, a 16 year old defender making their debut or a 35 year old veteran who has never scored in 500 games, it does not account for recent form of the player who is shooting, it does not take into account the actual moment of a match whether, i.e. the fatigue levels of a player, whether or not a team has already scored, whether a team has been building pressure, whether the keeper is having a worldie etc.etc.etc.....
50 minute breakdown on Trent and nothing on our performance ffs.
50 minute breakdown on Trent and nothing on our performance ffs.
It was a far better performance than that , juanfield game had two smashing boss but we played mustve second half a man and two nil up and still just hung on, we went toe to toe against a far better Liverpool team today and should’ve wonThat was as well as I can recall us playing at Anfield since the LVG win and Mata double.
Obviously you start by deducting 0.9 or so from Liverpool for the penalty. Total coincidence.
But on top that, I simply don’t understand how that system arrives at approx 1 xG for United. How does it make sense that the chances for our two goals, Højlunds chance, Maguires chance, and Amad’s header combined is expected to result in one goal? It’s nonsense.
Better today, but we were still second best. I liked Amorim not being too impressed as well. Shows the standards he has and that he knows that we need to perform better than we did today.
Michael Oliver