balaks
Full Member
Coutinho is a good player but not a top class one imho. If they spend over £80 million on him then the more fool them.
£135m would be a ridiculous fee and waste of Neymar money.
I think that's silly. Even Lukaku looks like a bargain at £75m now not to mention Pogba at £89m. It's bound to come back to normal level soon.This is the new market.
I think that's silly. Even Lukaku looks like a bargain at £75m now not to mention Pogba at £89m. It's bound to come back to normal level soon.
I think that's silly. Even Lukaku looks like a bargain at £75m now not to mention Pogba at £89m. It's bound to come back to normal level soon.
Hahaha kidding me for sure? Coutinho is in top 3-4 players in the PL, Nani never was.
4 months says twitter. If true, no way they'll get Countinho go.Rumours that Lallana has suffered a serious injury. Will make Liverpool more determined to keep him.
He's a good player but my God, he's hideously overrated by the EPL crew... He has his moments of outstanding quality but he has never put it all together into a consistent season of excellence. His best season was his last one, where he scored 14 goals and made 7 assists in what was one of the most attacking teams in the league, if not in Europe. And even then, he went missing for a couple of months after his injury.
If I was anywhere near Liverpool's board and Barca offered 100m I'd take it and run.
So who do you buy to replace him? He's a very good footballer and most clubs appear impossible to do business with even with huge bids.He's a good player but my God, he's hideously overrated by the EPL crew... He has his moments of outstanding quality but he has never put it all together into a consistent season of excellence. His best season was his last one, where he scored 14 goals and made 7 assists in what was one of the most attacking teams in the league, if not in Europe. And even then, he went missing for a couple of months after his injury.
If I was anywhere near Liverpool's board and Barca offered 100m I'd take it and run.
Yeah, Barca should not panic frankly and go crazy. They have a pretty good team as it is even without Neymar.
Should look at adding few smart additions if there is value or bide their time. However pressure might become too much from socios on Bartomeu to protect his position.
Well you'd probably spend £65m out of that £100m on van Dijk so it's a bit pointless indeed.So who do you buy to replace him? He's a very good footballer and most clubs appear impossible to do business with even with huge bids.
The consistency angle is over-played. He's one of the league's best players
I believe Liverpool are intent on parting with a large figure on VVD with or without Barca's millions. Selling Coutinho has no bearing on the purchase of a much needed CB.Well you'd probably spend £65m out of that £100m on van Dijk so it's a bit pointless indeed.
I believe Liverpool are intent on parting with a large figure on VVD with or without Barca's millions. Selling Coutinho has no bearing on the purchase of a much needed CB.
Quite right, we wanted Keita AND Van Dijk, neither connected with selling Coutinho.
Going for both with the prices quoted would indicate you have something like £120m to spend, now that none of them seem likely I am curious to who you'll spend on.
I think Coutinho is Liverpool's best player but if I'd rather Liverpool keep Coutinho or have an extra £100m to spend, I'd definitely go for the former. Coutinho is good but he's not that good. With that money, Liverpool could improve their team massively. (Alternatively, they could spend £85m on Gayle.)
Top 3-4 ? The feck he is.
Coutinho hasn't even outperformed Nanis best season at United (2010/2011).
Not that it much of a surprise, Liverpool supporters were keen to inform us how much better players Pongolle and Le Tallec were compared to "one trick pony" Ronaldo
Nonesense, Babel was the one with more to his game than Ronaldo
That's true. It's impossible to get a player as good as him from PL team with 85m. You can get cheaper from other league, but it's a big gamble. Not to mention, missing out Top 4 could cost a fortune itself.So who do you buy to replace him? He's a very good footballer and most clubs appear impossible to do business with even with huge bids.
The consistency angle is over-played. He's one of the league's best players
This. He's good but not great and im glad we arent forking out that kind of money for him.Coutinho is a good player but not a top class one imho. If they spend over £80 million on him then the more fool them.
For that kind of money theyd be crazy to say no. He's eminently replaceable.I understand your sentiment, but tbh I think it would be better for Liverpool to keep Coutinho. In this market it seems very difficult to buy players without having to resort to incredibly high fees, so 100m may sound a lot but they might not be able to buy a replacement player of Coutinho's caliber for that much, as crazy as it sounds.
He's a guaranteed starter at Liverpool though in a World Cup year. What happens if he goes to Barca and Iniesta raises his game one last time? He also just signed a contract in January so if Liverpool decide to put their foot down he's not going anywhere. He might not want to risk burning bridges in that case.The only thing that matters now is how much Coutinho wants the move. Is he happy to stick around another year, likely win nothing of note and get his move next summer (at the same time risking missing the boat). Or does he want to go this summer and straight away be at a club competing for everything all the time.
Earlier this year I had doubts about his ambition when he came out with all that bollocks about it being better to be idolised and have your statue built at Liverpool rather than 'just another top player' at a consistently successful club like Barcelona. Players with that attitude will never realise their potential. Go join Newcastle or something if you want the adulation and statues without the trophies.
In a market where selling clubs can afford not to sell or simply name their astronomical price, I strongly disagree with your assessment.For that kind of money theyd be crazy to say no. He's eminently replaceable.
He's a guaranteed starter at Liverpool though in a World Cup year. What happens if he goes to Barca and Iniesta raises his game one last time? He also just signed a contract in January so if Liverpool decide to put their foot down he's not going anywhere. He might not want to risk burning bridges in that case.
Then again, it looks like Barca intend to spend that Neymar money this summer itself, so the opportunity may just pass him by.
He's a good player but my God, he's hideously overrated by the EPL crew... He has his moments of outstanding quality but he has never put it all together into a consistent season of excellence. His best season was his last one, where he scored 14 goals and made 7 assists in what was one of the most attacking teams in the league, if not in Europe. And even then, he went missing for a couple of months after his injury.
If I was anywhere near Liverpool's board and Barca offered 100m I'd take it and run.
Yeah it's true the Brazilian NT selection tends to operate on unusual criteria.These would all be the concerns of a player lacking in ambition and not sure of his abilities.
And Iniesta simply can't play a whole season any more. The Selecao will always look much more favourably on Barcelona players than Liverpool. It took Coutinho ages to break into the Brazil team likely by virtue of being stuck at Liverpool, rather than talent.