Adebesi
Full Member
I knew there was stockpiling going on, I had no idea it would extend to Phil Jones.Well now at least we know the worst thing that Brexit has resulted in.
I knew there was stockpiling going on, I had no idea it would extend to Phil Jones.Well now at least we know the worst thing that Brexit has resulted in.
I am surprised, I thought Phil Jones was at £100k/week, unless he took a paycut which is good. £50k per week and injured half the time, still stealing a living.He was on £50k/ week before.
Comparison:
Rojo £80k/w
Smalling 80k/w
Lindelof £75k/w
Bailly 75k/w
Jones was a starter in a team that won 9 out of 10, yes a team that that looks shaky defensively and struggles to keep clean sheets. Hardly anything to boast about.Jones is a starter in a team that has won 9 out of 10 ten games - title winning form. I think our poor performances in the last few years have in hindsight, mostly had to do with poor managerial appointments, poor signings and poor decisions from managers. He will start another game not because we are rewarding mediocrity, but because of his performances in his last games. He's also got a new contract not because we are rewarding mediocrity, but because we'd be better off giving him a new contract than letting him go and weakening the team while gaining nothing.
To the poster you quoted as well - Woodward's excuse is already in.
"Look at the difference Ole made in half a season. We have a very good squad of players who all deserve a clean slate and a chance at a full pre-season and full season under Ole's positive leadership. This same squad finished 2nd the season before and there's no reason they cannot do the same, or better, again - we are backing Ole to return this squad of players to where they belong."
Another season of saving money.
I do not want Jones at this club as much as the next guy but we need to be reasonable.
He's a 26/27 year old regular England international. He's worth £30m.
Holy fecking shite.
He signed a contract of 4 years with an additional 1 year. There's no excuse for giving this injury prone liability that kind of contract. It's really moronic.How many better homegrown CBs do we have or plan to sign?
Are you all privy to the contract terms? Unless we've signed him on terms we wouldn't be able ship him out if needed I don't see an issue here.
There's other deadwood to leave before Jones.
Who in a right state of mind would pay 30 million pounds for Phil Jones?I do not want Jones at this club as much as the next guy but we need to be reasonable.
He's a 26/27 year old regular England international. He's worth £30m.
There's going to be a shortage of Phil Jones's?I knew there was stockpiling going on, I had no idea it would extend to Phil Jones.
It sounds nuts doesnt it?There's going to be a shortage of Phil Jones's?
Glazer era mate.
That's my big problem as well. That is the sort of contract length you give to a new signing.The problem is the length of the contract, 4+1? Fecking ridiculous
Who in a right state of mind would pay 30 million pounds for Phil Jones?
We would still have Tuanzebe coming back from loan. And most top sides get by with 4 senior CBs. Plus there is a big difference between not letting a player walk on a free and giving him a 4 year contract with an option for a fifth. The contract means that want Jones at the club for years to come.
B.u.p.a. might buy him.Or even £3m.
He’ll never be forgotten. Partially because he’ll be wandering around Carrington bumping into tables, making people spill hot coffee on themselves and trying to find the exit for the rest of time.Kudos to Phil's agent there, that is for sure.
I wonder how kind history will be to Phil Jones once his United career finally comes to an end, he'll likely get a testimonial (although they mean little these days in fairness) but after say a 10+ year stint at the club - how will he be remembered?
They would have a say but how would you know how big it is if we still don't know who from the coaching staff will be here next season ?I disagree, I think that Ole and the coaching staff would have a big hand in deciding whether they would want Jones, Young etc, and put their case to Woody, who would have worked out the salary offered to the said player (probably on a similar salary to now), and made the decision from that. Fellaini has gone, and I can only think that he wasn't in Ole's plans, and the club subsequently sold him.
Or £3Or even £3m.
I too think there is no way he is on the same wages. If Jones is as valued by the club as we suspect he is, he probably got a nice salary bump. He would be stupid to extend for such a long contract for the same wages.if you think Phil signed a new deal for 50k when he could of got 100k from the west hams and everton and a fat sign on bonus. And no player in their right mind would help their old club out by signing a new deal before getting kicked to the curb, a 4 year one too. Ludacris
4 +1 really??All the complaining in here is nonsensical.
Yes Jones is a liability and yes we can do better, but there are a lot of sensible reasons for him to sign up...
English quota
*5th/ 6th choice CB with versatility to cover DM or RB in an emergency. Anyone saying youth could fill this slot is heavily underestimating the step up in experience required. It's better for youth to go on loan and step up once ready.
*Good chance to profit on this rather than lose for nothing or use as bargaining chip in exchange
*Plenty of experience to share
*Humble good dressing room personality
*Over inflated market means a replacement would be vastly expensive just as a backup
*Too much other business to do
If he had a contract would I say sell him this summer...yes, but when his contract is running out we need to renew then look to sell at the right time.
No chance. It would at least be around 100k now.I too think there is no way he is on the same wages. If Jones is as valued by the club as we suspect he is, he probably got a nice salary bump. He would be stupid to extend for such a long contract for the same wages.
Or a top class performerThat's my big problem as well. That is the sort of contract length you give to a new signing.
Peak Jones from a financial POV ?No chance. It would at least be around 100k now.
4 + 1 year contract shows that the club loves and values Jones quite highly. And believes he is a top talent and as Ole said he is entering prime, which means we are looking at peak Jones for next 5 years. Whatever that means.
Jones has 2 own goals, 0 errors leading to goals and 0 red cards in 191 EPL appearances. Smalling in comparison has 3 own goals, 3 errors leading to goals and 1 red card in 208 appearances (according to the premier league). But Jones is the one that is being made out as a liability, the one that costs us every game, scoring own goals left, right and center. Why? Because everything Jones does is blown out of proportion.Jones was a starter in a team that won 9 out of 10, yes a team that that looks shaky defensively and struggles to keep clean sheets. Hardly anything to boast about.
And forget the last 10 games, Jones over the last 8 years here has proven that he is NOT to be relied upon. He has let us down time after time, and injury after another. And when he is fit, he can't be trusted because there's always a brain fart around the corner. Chelsea away last year, Spurs away, Chelsea in the final, own goals left right and centre, fecking tragic. If these decision makers can't see that, it's pathetic and we will continue in this vein.
Again, awarding mediocrity has been one of the biggest problems for this club. Valencia, Young, Rojo, Jones have been long overdue, and here we are 3 of those are signing new contracts. We are not offering this guy a 5 year contract to stop him leaving on a free.
I'm not sure that's true, he put in a stellar performance man-marking Ronaldo...
Maybe we have loads of money and don't know what to do with it. The club has shown that they value Jones. For what, is a mystery to me at least.Peak Jones from a financial POV ?
I honestly wouldn't be bothered if Jones was a relatively fit and available player