Redo91
Full Member
In my opinion of course, I wasn't stating it as fact
I know. As you were stating your opinion you shouldn't have said that there was "no doubt" he was going to end up there.
In my opinion of course, I wasn't stating it as fact
The fact is, a policy of not going for young players who we feel may end up at Madrid one day translates into a policy of not signing the best players in the world.
There are good players, then there is a level of good a player can get to where everyone automatically starts linking him to Madrid. As a top club, we would surely like to have one or two at that level in the team, and shouldn't be leaving the entire top-shelf to Real and Barca to divide up between themselves.
Pogba will
Agreed. Raiola obviously benefits from the moves, but it doesn't strike me as though he primarily instigates them.If he wants to, he will but it won't come from Raiola. To be precise Balotelli and Ibrahimovic moved a lot, but almost all moves had a sense.
If he wants to, he will but it won't come from Raiola. To be precise Balotelli and Ibrahimovic moved a lot, but almost all moves had a sense.
The big question with Pogba is whether we would break the bank to bring him back when he has already left once and is by no means guaranteed to stay for an entire career here.
The big question with Pogba is whether we would break the bank to bring him back when he has already left once and is by no means guaranteed to stay for an entire career here.
The big question with Pogba is whether we would break the bank to bring him back when he has already left once and is by no means guaranteed to stay for an entire career here.
Do we not profit from a sale in the future? I doubt we look at investments as individual gains and losses. As in we are hardly going to refuse to pay Ronaldo 300k a week because he cost us £200k last time he was here and decided to leave us.
Exactly. He would feck off again if Real came calling. Or certainly take the piss with contract negotiations.
Either did Ronaldo...either will De Gea. Works both ways just ask Stam.
Did we profit from his last departure ? The main point here is whether we would get burned again by a player who by all accounts looks like he will spend a career hopping from club to club.
The analogy is limited since none of those players came back to us.
So is the idea of him leaving again. He might not be the player at 27 everyone thought he would be and thus we sell him! Doesnt matter if he's been here and gone and gone again. Cesc at barca........another analogy?
All analogies to Pogba are pretty much out the window since it would take a near record fee for us to bring him back. Therefore the risk is much higher.
I'd take him even if he leaves in a couple of years. It’s similar to De Gea situation, it’s very likely we will get the same money we paid for him, but it was totally worth it. It seems that finally we are not concerned about prices, value on the market and all, and we accept that you have to pay if you want top players. IMO buying him for 70m isn’t a big risk, he’s already ridiculously good.
When have we last sold a player for 60m? Ronaldo was a one off. We are generally very poor in getting value for the players we are shipping out.
He's the best young CM on the planet. Crazy good and crazy young. He's worth GBP60-70m IMO. He's not a Ronaldo or Bale and as such so he's not worthy of a record transfer fee. I think he'll be snapped up at these prices buy Real Madrid or Barca.
Did we profit from his last departure ? The main point here is whether we would get burned again by a player who by all accounts looks like he will spend a career hopping from club to club.
When have we last sold a player for 60m? Ronaldo was a one off. We are generally very poor in getting value for the players we are shipping out.
When was the last time we had the best player in the world? We pretty much sell players when they are through! If someone wants Pogba from us at his peak they best cough up £££. I don't get why this is a problem.
4 years of Pogba 2 EPL and a Champions League for instances is well worth if for me as a fan.
Cleverly, Hernandez, Welbeck and now De Gea. We are very poor or extremely unlucky or a combination of the two.
Chelsea would have made around 75m at least by selling these players.
Am I missing something? De Gea gone? We got 17m for Welbeck. He has scored 4 prem goals. I pretty much think we done okay there. Cleverley plays for Villa not Wolfsburg so don't see what the problem is there and Hernandez we will profit or break even which is fine, he isn't exactly the full package.
I think that the underlying sentiment behind this common view is that deep down some of our fans seem to see us as not being at the pinnacle of European football. That is then coupled with the fact that Paul Pogba is pretty obviously destined for the pinnacle.
I very much doubt that if we were discussing him joining Real, the belief would be that he obviously isn't going there to stay. The only way out of that club for a big signing is if he fails to deliver. Basically, it is an inferiority complex that says that we are not a big enough club for Paul Pogba. Since Woodward came in on some BMF shit, I doubt the fear is that he will leave because of money. We can obviously pay him lots, so the fear seems to be that he will want to take the 'next step'.
I said earlier in this thread that we cannot leave the entire top-shelf to Real Madrid and Barcelona. We are up there with the biggest of clubs, and have the financial muscle to rival anyone. It is only by bringing in these types of players and winning more trophies that we will slowly eradicate the notion that this pinnacle is Real/Barca. They were not born royalty. Barca are there because they have bought top players over their history, that players want to follow. Let's do the same. Barca have only won one more CL than us. Their history isn't just about trophies per se, it is more the individuals they have had. Not buying players because they may leave one day is silly. As is the general notion United fans seem to hold that every player should be spending 'the rest of their careers' at Old Trafford.
Cleverly, Hernandez, Welbeck and now De Gea. We are very poor or extremely unlucky or a combination of the two.
Chelsea would have made around 75m at least by selling these players.
I wasn't suggesting we shouldn't be pursuing him. The point i was making is there is tremendous risk in paying 60-80m for him, as there would be no guarantee that he would be the magical missing link to our success. Van Gaal, imo, is interested in building a system with team players who can do what he wants them to at each position. Fans always look to individuals (players) as pieces to a puzzle whereas the club has to look at the intangibles from work ethic, attitude, agent relations etc. I'm by no means convinced Pogba will somehow magically transform us, and given his knee jerk attitude of fecking off the greener pastures, I'm not remotely convinced he'll never do it again. Bottom line, there is considerable risk and questionable reward in pursuing Pogba.
It was LVG and the club that went for Di Maria and Falcao! You could argue a continuation of the scatter gun approach Moyes was guilty of considring neither are deemed necessary now to the first 11! The risk is even greater with lesser names making the grade, they are leading names for a reason after all!
If anything, our pursuit of Di Maria and Falcao is inescapable proof that throwing massive transfer fees and wages at recently world class players is a highly risky proposition. Not saying Pogba wouldn't be successful, but like the others, he would come with his own significant, proprietary risk.
We won't get anything more than 15-20m for De Gea, that too if he is sold this season. And that's what I am trying to say, that there is always some reason for us to not get the maximum value we can from the market.
Welbeck might have scored only 4 goals but lesser players (english) have gone for much more than him. Whoever Cleverly plays for is irrelevant, we are getting nothing for him. Hernandez scored 20 goals a season for us and is surely a 15-20m player but I am convinced that he will go for lesser.
I wasn't suggesting we shouldn't be pursuing him. The point i was making is there is tremendous risk in paying 60-80m for him, as there would be no guarantee that he would be the magical missing link to our success. Van Gaal, imo, is interested in building a system with team players who can do what he wants them to at each position. Fans always look to individuals (players) as pieces to a puzzle whereas the club has to look at the intangibles from work ethic, attitude, agent relations etc. I'm by no means convinced Pogba will somehow magically transform us, and given his knee jerk attitude of fecking off the greener pastures, I'm not remotely convinced he'll never do it again. Bottom line, there is considerable risk and questionable reward in pursuing Pogba.
Yeah and how did looking for value in the market and taking risks like Zaha and Bebe go down? The fact is if we buy Pogba, Bale, Lewandowski and Varane no amount of penny pinching would give us a better chance of silverware! Simples