Every single paragraph in that post is either incorrect, a terrible argument or made up with the exception of the first one. Of course MSN was Messi first and foremost. Shocking, considering he is the best football player of all time with 8 Ballon d'Or.
Barcelona becoming a winning machine has nothing to do with two of the best midfielders of all time breaking through in Xavi and Iniesta, along with Messi, only for Busquets to break through a few years later? Yeah, it was all Ronaldinho. Ffs
A team isn't a one man show, you know. You can't magically win one of the best trophies in the world because of one player, and then fault him for not winning it. Messi lost the World Cup against Germany in the final, does that make him a lesser player? Granted he did make up for it against France, but only Martinez' save saved his ass.
Ronaldinho played for a much better Brazil. Don't be ridiculous. That World Cup, Ronaldinho was awful, so that's a weak argument. The Copa America he won, he was 19 and played a whopping 90 minutes during the entire tournament, and not a second in the final.
When comparing player ability (which is what this is), trophies aren't that relevant. I also share the opinion that Ronaldinho was a better player, but the idea on here that the gap is so enormous is ridiculous. Ability wise and natural talent, they are pretty similar. Ronaldinho has done nothing on the pitch that Neymar hasn't.
If Neymar didn't have Messi and Ronaldo around him, he would quite easily have won Ballon d'Or. Ronaldinho would not have won his if he played in the same time, no matter how good he was.