Neymar vs Ronaldinho: Who was the better player?

Who was the better player


  • Total voters
    601
Not sure what your point is. Your chances of winning the World Cup are greatly increased when you have four of the greatest players of all time as your teammates.

that it isn't relevant in this particular case, as he wasn't facing all time Spain or France teams in those years for him to need prime R9 in order to compete. they would lose immediately after the group stage, against opponents they dominated.

Ronaldinho made a fool of A. Cole before his assist and then Seaman with that free kick. it didn't just happen to him, he forced that comeback.

Neymar don't have remotely similar game for his NT.
 
I dont feel he did. When people rate the best they've seen, Ronaldinho is almost on the list, Neymar isnt.

I feel this is that every time Neymar was on the pitch at Barca, Messi was too.
 
I feel this is that every time Neymar was on the pitch at Barca, Messi was too.

That's a fair point. But Ronaldinho and Messi did actually play together, but Messi just hadnt hit his peak yet, but his peak dribbling was 2005/2006.
 
that it isn't relevant in this particular case, as he wasn't facing all time Spain or France teams in those years for him to need prime R9 in order to compete. they would lose immediately after the group stage, against opponents they dominated.

Ronaldinho made a fool of A. Cole before his assist and then Seaman with that free kick. it didn't just happen to him, he forced that comeback.

Neymar don't have remotely similar game for his NT.
Complete nonsense. The World Cup is very difficult to win (at any time in history, I don't care what 'prime' teams are there or not there) and the better your team, the more chance you have of going the whole way and offsetting the inevitable potholes of bad performances and Ill luck. This is pretty straightforward.

Also, Neymar was brilliant in the 2014 WC before he got injured, so I'm not sure what you're talking about there either. Ronaldinho scored two goals in 2002 (out of a total of 18 for Brazil) and you're trying to build some ridiculous argument about how the strength of his team didn't matter. Please.
 
Ronaldinho won the world cup with Kleberson and Roque Junior starting
 
Ronaldinho won the world cup with Kleberson and Roque Junior starting
Kléberson was one of the best players in that World Cup. He had a performance similar to Mascherano's in 2014. Better than Ronaldinho for sure.
 
Weakest Brazilian team my ass! The Brazilian NT who won WC 2002 had Cafu, Lucio, Roberto Carlos, Gilberto Silva, Ronaldinho, Rivaldo, and Ronaldo thats 7 world class players on starting XI while on the bench sat Kaka, Dida, Edmilson, Juliano Belletti, and Rogerio Ceni.


Ronaldinho was the most entertaining footballer in the last 30 years, he was the type of player you willingly pay to watch while Neymar has only had himself to blame, if he wasnt such greedy or insecure he'd be remembered more fondly playing for "real" clubs instead of plastic ones.
 
The World Cup is very difficult to win (at any time in history, I don't care what 'prime' teams are there or not there) and the better your team, the more chance you have of going the whole way and offsetting the inevitable potholes of bad performances and Ill luck. This is pretty straightforward.

straightforward but again, irrelevant, since Brazil were good enough for us to avoid this "player x can't go past quarters because he plays with y, while player z had it easier" discussion.

he had a perfectly good platform to offer a memorable knockout game at WC and very beatable opponents, in the end it just didn't happen.
 
He did offer a memorable performance and goal. Not his fault the football gods hate him
 
He did offer a memorable performance and goal. Not his fault the football gods hate him

memorable goal more than memorable match. look for any post match report that include individual ratings if you don't remember, everyone have him at 6 or 7, and that's with that goal, some don't even think he was fit.

https://www.90min.com/posts/croatia...-ratings-selecao-crash-out-penalties-09-12-22

Really, really quiet for almost the entire game but a moment of absolute magic to put Brazil ahead. A sensational goal.

https://www.independent.co.uk/sport...player-ratings-neymar-livakovic-b2242260.html

Perhaps he wasn’t fully fit; certainly he didn’t look at his most agile and lithe. But more problematic was a series of poor decisions in the final third, most notably that non-return to Vini. Laboured in the dribble and unable to beat his man too often. And then, in extra time, a display of balance, acceleration, control, poise and composure.

https://www.101greatgoals.com/news/...atings-expert-analysis-fan-reaction-and-more/

https://www.goal.com/en/lists/croat...tbreak/bltc6611cdf15f1add8#csee41d77999af462d

etc.

it's about how I remember it as well. not his fault they lost obviously.
 
Ronaldinho was the most entertaining footballer in the last 30 years, he was the type of player you willingly pay to watch while Neymar has only had himself to blame, if he wasnt such greedy or insecure he'd be remembered more fondly playing for "real" clubs instead of plastic ones.

I don't think people mind him playing for "plastic" club at all. but playing for that particular club means your only stage is CL since the league titles have little weight. and when you're also absent/injured in CL, well...

City aren't any better than PSG, but if they were the one that bought him, toying with Liverpool or Utd would be entirely different career obviously.
 
straightforward but again, irrelevant, since Brazil were good enough for us to avoid this "player x can't go past quarters because he plays with y, while player z had it easier" discussion.

he had a perfectly good platform to offer a memorable knockout game at WC and very beatable opponents, in the end it just didn't happen.
No they weren't. When did Brazil ever have the best team in the tournament in Neymar's period? In 2014, he scored or created half of all their goals in the competition, and basically carried the team offensively, in a way that Ronaldinho never did. Then he got injured and we all know what happened after that. No team that is that reliant on one player is winning the World Cup, unless that player is Diego Maradona, and Neymar, for all his gifts, ain't that. But then, neither is Ronaldinho.

It's not about having a team that is theoretically good enough to win the World Cup. That applies to hundreds of teams. It's about having a team that is strong from top to bottom (preferably with multiple world class players) and a squad that is deep.

In the entire history of the World Cup, that is what wins, with very few exceptions.
 
Ronaldinho won the world cup with Kleberson and Roque Junior starting
Kleberson was great at that WC and Roque Junior wasn't bad at all. That Brazil team was stacked and that three Rs attacking trio is stuff of legends.

Ronaldinho played more than his part in it.
 
Not sure how anyone can say Neymar really.

Having watched Ronaldinho, I've yet to see a player bar Messi, Ronaldo and R9 terrify an entire team as much as he did.

The guy literally bullied prime Mourinho's Chelsea and was the difference maker during that tie with AC Milan back in 2005 when they won the CL. His peak was simply levels above Neymar back when defenses where super packed and speed wasn't as effective as it is currently. When in form, the lad was unplayable. He got a standing ovation from the Bernabeu after dribbling past their entire team twice in the same match.



Neymar while a very good and talented footballer was at least 2 levels below Dinho.

You have the GOAT tier with Ronaldo, Pele, Messi, Maradona. Then you have the one below them and Dinho is in that tier. Neymar would be at least a tier below that.
 
My view is that it's hard to define how good they were. They were comfortably the best team at the World Cup, yet others bombed and therefore it's impossible to say how good they were.

Comparing them to the 1994 team is interesting. 2002 has more world-class players, but also weaker players at CB and CM.

I think the weakness of the '02 was their relatively poor collective passing game, especially midfield, where almost every team matched or beat them in effective possession play. They had a strong defensive unit (despite Roque Junior presence) with Edmilson, Gilberto Silva, and Kleberson having very good tournaments providing the extra protection there that allowed Carlos and Cafu to get forward. They had great counters, lots of athleticism in the team, and deadly shots around the edge of the box.

imo, The biggest advantage between the two is the '94 team had a more balanced midfield that was better at controlling the tempo and attacking flow of their games. It was only really the Netherlands that gave them issues there.

The '02 team also got a massive, quite likely deliberately corrupt gift against Belgium, in a game they were none too impressive in. I can't remember any "good luck" to that extent for the '94 team.

 
The '02 team also got a massive, quite likely deliberately corrupt gift against Belgium, in a game they were none too impressive in. I can't remember any "good luck" to that extent for the '94 team.

That 2002 WC was corrupted from start to finish. Ronaldo come back story got the headlines, but looking back it had more controversy than all other WC's together in the last 30 years.
 
That 2002 WC was corrupted from start to finish. Ronaldo come back story got the headlines, but looking back it had more controversy than all other WC's together in the last 30 years.

True. I think part of it was football exploding commercially at the time, more money on the line than ever before, yet probably still easier to get away with things than even just ten years later. Plus, at that time the South Koreans and Japanese had a notoriously corrupt, nationalistic officiating culture in some of their traditional sports like boxing (which was hardly clean and noble elsewhere, so you know it was bad), and it seemed that, for SK at least, this approach carried straight over to the football.
 
The guy got nailed a lot for his impudence and a number of times was taken out of games completely in this manner.

thought you'd appreciate this video of the argentina national team speaking about their tactics to stop him

 
thought you'd appreciate this video of the argentina national team speaking about their tactics to stop him


Yeah, if the lid was lifted on nefarious tactics to stop Neymar, there'd be plenty of teams with something to say. He's suffered more systematic fouling than anyone else I can think of after Maradona. Others have intended to do the same to the likes of Messi and other highly skilled players, but refs mostly step in and keep that down to a minimum. Neymar, by contrast, has mostly been seen as fair game with very little protection afforded. People then call him a diver, not even connecting the dots, or caring to.
 
Boomer cafe or whatever Neymar never led any team to victories being the talisman that Ronaldinho did at Barcelona. At Barcelona he was under the shadow of Messi. In PSG, when Mbappe came, he went under his shadow.
Davids was the catalyst for Barcelona before Ronaldinho came to the fore. History is being rewritten in this thread that Ronaldinho was some Maradona-esque figure at Barcelona when in fact he was one amongst many who saw them perform as they did. Take Eto'o, Deco and Davids out of those teams and Ronaldinho's platform to perform would be halved. He was a great player for Barcelona and an un-paralled entertainer, but the talk is taking him into another realm and downplaying the massive contributions of the players around him, like it was a one-man show rather than a great entertainer grabbing all the headlines whilst a lot of very good players went about their business effectively.

Neymar was clearly the better player between he and Mbappe.
 
I like Ronaldinho more but If I had to sign one for United today (and build around him) I’d go with Neymar.
 
Boomer cafe or whatever Neymar never led any team to victories being the talisman that Ronaldinho did at Barcelona. At Barcelona he was under the shadow of Messi. In PSG, when Mbappe came, he went under his shadow.
Ronaldinho would have been in Messi's shadow too, he wasn't the best player in the Brazilian NT he played in.

Mbappe arrived at PSG the same time Neymar did. The only CL final they reached was thanks to Neymar, so i don't understand what you're talking about.
 
. The only CL final they reached was thanks to Neymar, so i don't understand what you're talking about.

:lol:

Oh yeah, it had nothing at all to do with the draw like.

R16: Dortmund
Quarter Finals: Atalanta
Semi Final: Leipzig

The quarters and Semi were one legged affairs too due to Covid AND he scored in neither.

But sure, twas all down to him.
 
Davids was the catalyst for Barcelona before Ronaldinho came to the fore. History is being rewritten in this thread that Ronaldinho was some Maradona-esque figure at Barcelona when in fact he was one amongst many who saw them perform as they did. Take Eto'o, Deco and Davids out of those teams and Ronaldinho's platform to perform would be halved. He was a great player for Barcelona and an un-paralled entertainer, but the talk is taking him into another realm and downplaying the massive contributions of the players around him, like it was a one-man show rather than a great entertainer grabbing all the headlines whilst a lot of very good players went about their business effectively.

Neymar was clearly the better player between he and Mbappe.
Mbappe won player of the year every year, a lot was due to injuries but it was Mbappé that was carrying that team with consistent performance, he’s probably the best Ligue 1 player of all time so to say Neymar was the clearly better player when they were there, don’t think it’s right.
 
Mbappe won player of the year every year, a lot was due to injuries but it was Mbappé that was carrying that team with consistent performance, he’s probably the best Ligue 1 player of all time so to say Neymar was the clearly better player when they were there, don’t think it’s right.

Aye, plenty of attempts to rewrite history here too, as though Mbappe was just some numpty who was lucky to play with Neymar.
 
Mbappe won player of the year every year, a lot was due to injuries but it was Mbappé that was carrying that team with consistent performance, he’s probably the best Ligue 1 player of all time so to say Neymar was the clearly better player when they were there, don’t think it’s right.
Neymar having seasons curtailed by injury opens the doors for others to win awards. Those watching PSG or Ligue 1 week in and week out used to always set me straight on Neymar’s impact. Would be happy for them to set the record straight, but Neymar being the top dog there isn’t new news.
 
Neymar having seasons curtailed by injury opens the doors for others to win awards. Those watching PSG or Ligue 1 week in and week out used to always set me straight on Neymar’s impact. Would be happy for them to set the record straight, but Neymar being the top dog there isn’t new news.
It’s not others plural, it’s all Mbappé, he won 5x Ligue 1 Player of the Year and 256 goals in 308 games. I think Neymar was brilliant when he was fit for PSG as well but you can’t rely on a player who misses half the games. If they had both been fit and top form then they might have won the CL but I don’t think they were the most complementary players ever. Both fine players though.
 
It’s not others plural, it’s all Mbappé, he won 5x Ligue 1 Player of the Year and 256 goals in 308 games. I think Neymar was brilliant when he was fit for PSG as well but you can’t rely on a player who misses half the games. If they had both been fit and top form then they might have won the CL but I don’t think they were the most complementary players ever. Both fine players though.
Yeah, either or, still, Neymar > Mbappe in that side. Having said that, it is Neymar who gets played down in these discussions whilst Ronaldinho gets elevated to being a peerless one-man army, which is a re-imagining of reality especially so when Ronaldinho’s true time to shine and claim a footing alongside the upper echelon came in ‘06 and he failed it spectacularly.

I would still take Ronaldinho for my vote, but the reframing of the timeline and how things actually were is painting a picture that never was.
 
Neymar eclipses Ronaldinho in damn near everything, played with similar magic and did it for longer.

Ronaldinho has the nostalgia and likability thing going for him. Football fans, generally speaking, also tend to look fondly on/lean favourably towards the past. I mean I love Ronaldinho and all, but Neymar >

People in this thread saying Ronaldinho and Ronaldo at United were the last entertainers. Clueless



He's incredibly underrated on this forum.
 
Neymar is the biggest disappointment in football for me. He still reached an incredibly high level but issues of his own doing will mean he’ll never be close to Ronaldinho in such a comparison.

Ronaldinho himself was a disappointment for only having a short lived peak but he gave us everything he had in those 3 or 4 years. We saw the best version of Dinho.

Neymar in my opinion barely improved on his game after 2016 when he was 24. He’s the most talented offensive player I’ve seen after Messi he could do it all. Great with both feet, set pieces, dribbling, finishing, link up play and off the ball running. His major problem was his immaturity on the pitch and wastefulness. This was a continued theme of his game until he left Europe. Add in his career choice to move to PSG and he wasted the chance to have an all time great career. Of course injuries played a massive part too.

Unlike Neymar, Ronaldinho was an incredibly focused player on the pitch. He’d showboat but wouldn’t be a brat like Neymar and let opponents get into his head and rattle him with challenges or physicality. Ronaldinho was one of the strongest attackers I’ve ever seen on the ball, he embraced all the aggression from opponents when he embarrassed them.

Another thing people are missing is although they technically played the same position, Dinho’s primary role was creativity first then goals while it was the opposite for Neymar. Ronaldinho was an attacking midfielder in my opinion and Neymar was a forward so that needs to be considered when comparing stats.
 
Neymar eclipses Ronaldinho in damn near everything, played with similar magic and did it for longer.

Ronaldinho has the nostalgia and likability thing going for him. Football fans, generally speaking, also tend to look fondly on/lean favourably towards the past. I mean I love Ronaldinho and all, but Neymar >

People in this thread saying Ronaldinho and Ronaldo at United were the last entertainers. Clueless



Imagine calling the 92% clueless, my God man, it’s a good job you aren’t made of chocolate.
 
This is the easiest versus poll ever. Neymar was never even that good.
You're right, he was actually pretty shit who didn't know how to dribble or go past defenders. One of his weaknesses. And those 20+ league goals he scored for Barcelona in his first two seasons as a winger? Pure garbage goals, simply tap-ins where Messi did all the work. His assists were all Messi too.

How can you be an adult and think Neymar wasn't "that good"? Genuinely curious.
 
Mbappe won player of the year every year, a lot was due to injuries but it was Mbappé that was carrying that team with consistent performance, he’s probably the best Ligue 1 player of all time so to say Neymar was the clearly better player when they were there, don’t think it’s right.
It is right. Mbappe winning those things means nothing, he is French and from Paris no less. If you watched the games when they played together, Neymar ran the entire attack.