Jimble
Over 65s Team Player
at this point, I wouldn't be surprised to see part of it fall down on its opening match
And SoFi/all US NFL stadiums are built like that because the fans that want to watch the game sit on the sides and the ones that want to fart about go in the entertainment bits in the endzones. Football/soccer it's the opposite so we'll likely have that large end stand regardless.
Not really true
Also not sure where the notion of these stadiums in the US are surrounded by entertainment complexes come from. Most are either crammed into a city or are surrounded by acres of car parks due to little public transport in the US. Tailgating is a big part of the culture in US sports. Main focus of US stadium's is the concessions inside.
So wanting working class people to be able afford more than one match a season makes me a nostalgia merchant? Wanting a ground that actually caters for normal people is wrong?
Maybe we should sack off any links to our mancunian heritage and move down south? Build a 120,000 seater stadium. The atmosphere will be shite and no ordinary people will be able to afford it but the club's revenue will increase loads so we can chuck more money at overrated and overpaid bozos. Sounds ace.
Indeed...
With the money flowing through football at the moment, there shouldn't be a reason to increase ticket prices.
It's a combination of sheer greed and awful management.
I've mentioned it before but United could increase revenue loads by building some half decent bars and restaurants near the ground. There's nowhere decent near OT so would be cleae demand from day one.
Why is nostalgia considered such a bad thing?
Both those stadiums were iconic and whilst, they were too small, often created a fantastic atmosphere. West Ham's ground is now awful on every level.
I actually like the new Spurs ground but again, it's been used as a method for increasing ticket prices and outpricing working class fans.
The whole point of the new build plans is the limitations at the current site, due to the canal and the train tracks.I’d like a traditional looking stadium which is actually modern, I think they call it retro?
Maybe an Old Trafford that doesn’t look like a bloody Meccano set has been bolted to it with decent leg room and bigger seats as people are getting taller and bigger.
A capacity of around 80,000 would be ideal and build it where the existing ground is now, and when it’s been built ground share with Everton, they will be grateful of the extra revenue and we would probably get a good deal, not too far to travel for a season or two.
The end result will be a great looking traditional looking yet modern stadium fit for 100+ years.
I’m not sure Merseyside Police would back an idea where they’d have both United and Liverpool or Everton and Liverpool playing home games in such close proximity to each other on the same day or same weekend for an entire season or two.I’d like a traditional looking stadium which is actually modern, I think they call it retro?
Maybe an Old Trafford that doesn’t look like a bloody Meccano set has been bolted to it with decent leg room and bigger seats as people are getting taller and bigger.
A capacity of around 80,000 would be ideal and build it where the existing ground is now, and when it’s been built ground share with Everton, they will be grateful of the extra revenue and we would probably get a good deal, not too far to travel for a season or two.
The end result will be a great looking traditional looking yet modern stadium fit for 100+ years.
Is it? Some prefer it, others don't.The actual stadiums themselves have entertainment bits in the endzones, not that they're surrounding by entertainment complexes. Think of the pirate ship at Tampa Bay for our esteemed owners as an example.
The design of NFL stadiums prioritises seats for the fans down the sides and then scattered seating in the endzones to make space for entertainment - a direct opposite to having fans behind the goals in football/soccer stadiums.
It's fan preference and it's a well known 'thing'.
Hmm, I didn’t think that through did II’m not sure Merseyside Police would back an idea where they’d have both United and Liverpool or Everton and Liverpool playing home games in such close proximity to each other on the same day or same weekend for an entire season or two.
The actual stadiums themselves have entertainment bits in the endzones, not that they're surrounding by entertainment complexes. Think of the pirate ship at Tampa Bay for our esteemed owners as an example.
The design of NFL stadiums prioritises seats for the fans down the sides and then scattered seating in the endzones to make space for entertainment - a direct opposite to having fans behind the goals in football/soccer stadiums.
It's fan preference and it's a well known 'thing'.
I honestly don't think it matters. We still call it a United shirt, not a Snapdragon shirt, and we'll still call any stadium we build on that site Old Trafford.Oh god, I'd absolutely hate our stadium being called Snapdragon Stadium.
"But everyone else does it", "we need to finance the stadium", bla, bla, bla.
Old Trafford powered by Qualcomm
I honestly don't think it matters. We still call it a United shirt, not a Snapdragon shirt, and we'll still call any stadium we build on that site Old Trafford.
I mean if you'd read the article or even tweets about the article....Oh god, I'd absolutely hate our stadium being called Snapdragon Stadium.
"But everyone else does it", "we need to finance the stadium", bla, bla, bla.
I understand your reservations, but as the income raised is pure revenue, ultimately it means more to spend on players - perhaps the difference in choice between 'Neves or Amrabat' type signings in the future.Oh god, I'd absolutely hate our stadium being called Snapdragon Stadium.
"But everyone else does it", "we need to finance the stadium", bla, bla, bla.
No chance, it's only 6.000 more than we have now. If we're getting a new stadium, it should the biggest and best we can fit on there, and it should be 90k at a minimum.I’d like a traditional looking stadium which is actually modern, I think they call it retro?
Maybe an Old Trafford that doesn’t look like a bloody Meccano set has been bolted to it with decent leg room and bigger seats as people are getting taller and bigger.
A capacity of around 80,000 would be ideal and build it where the existing ground is now, and when it’s been built ground share with Everton, they will be grateful of the extra revenue and we would probably get a good deal, not too far to travel for a season or two.
The end result will be a great looking traditional looking yet modern stadium fit for 100+ years.
I mean if you'd read the article or even tweets about the article....
Like every time a commentator mentions the "Etihad", I don't think that'll be the case. Maybe if the new stadium didn't have a name to begin with, but not if it's the name from the beginning.I honestly don't think it matters. We still call it a United shirt, not a Snapdragon shirt, and we'll still call any stadium we build on that site Old Trafford.
I mean if you'd read the article or even tweets about the article....
To be fair, their stadium wasn't built on the same site as Maine Road, and the previous name was the uninspiring mouthful: 'The City of Manchester Stadium'.Like every time a commentator mentions the "Etihad", I don't think that'll be the case. Maybe if the new stadium didn't have a name to begin with, but not if it's the name from the beginning.
They should have just rebranded it as officially "City Stadium".To be fair, their stadium wasn't built on the same site as Maine Road, and the previous name was the uninspiring mouthful: 'The City of Manchester Stadium'.
If they want to give us £50m+ a year for naming rights to a stadium everyone will still call Old Trafford anyway, we'd be stupid not to take it.
It would be closer to £10m. Stadium naming rights really aren't worth very much.
Still, it’s not more than badly negotiated deal for a McTominay or an Amrabat. Surely not worth selling your soul for?Barca will get 20mil once the Camp Nou is fully renovated. We'll get more.
I think the old one will cease to exist personally & the new one will just be calledFrom how I understand it, Old Trafford will stay the same yes - but a new Old Trafford / stadium wont be called Old Trafford in the first place, so it has no other name than what it begins with - Which'll then be Snapdragon Something. I doubt we'll name two stadiums Old Trafford. Or just call the old one Old Old trafford? Sounds a little off.
Hopefully. I can sort of life with that, but no way in hell should it be an outright Snapdragon Arena or Snapdragon Stadium.I think the old one will cease to exist personally & the new one will just be called
“Old Trafford powered by Snapdragon” but everyone will just call it Old Trafford.
Still, it’s not more than badly negotiated deal for a McTominay or an Amrabat. Surely not worth selling your soul for?