Redlambs
Creator of the Caftards comics
Liverpool fan with 53,661 posts on a United forum = loser.
Loser with nothing better to add than an insult = loser.
Liverpool fan with 53,661 posts on a United forum = loser.
Liverpool fan with 53,661 posts on a United forum = loser.
But this is just what the site started off as! You are repeating history, not changing the future.
?
yes it's the equivalent of a major pruning of the main forums. you'd be promoted back if you showed you talked sense, mods could be much stricter with promotions ergo less people would get through and those that did would be those whose posts were generally of a higher quality therefore in the future the overall quality in the main forums would be higher yeah?
This bloke would be invited into the elite forum....
This is half the problem, girly posters who jump up and down and scream "wind up".
I don't know where this sensitivity has come from....the spastics probably
Not at all, I was quite happy in your thread Davo, and contributed to all manner of discussion in there. It's only when you go crying to the mods for change that I call you out as the hypocrite that you are.
And yep it's like the newbie system just a 3rd tier one with fewer members, the main forums would still be the main forums being sensibly modded and so on, but posters who while too good for the newbies because they raise valid points but who also use the forum for spam and posting shit wouldn't be invited to the 'elite' forum, as Davo said traffic would probably be very slow, this would be the main forum still and users who participated in the 'elite forum would still be posting here because here is where the majority of posters would be posting.
Again, you fail to see.
This is what the current system is supposed to do. The fact it's come to this situation now, won't be bettered by starting from scratch, which is in essence what you are suggesting. If it's to start from scratch (which isn't feasible btw), you'd need much more major changes to prevent it from becoming what the forums are now.
feck, I thought we had got rid of Thatcher!
You have a very high opinion of yourself and your opinion Davo. Especially for someone who uses the word 'Spastic' to describe people with whom you disagree.
However this is a stirling idea because when you have set up your elitist wank fest (for one) maybe you could just feck off and leave us alone.
Forums are supposed to be for all, so that you get some diverse opinion, however misguided, on any given topic.
And before you say it, I wouldn't want to be in your right wing think tank..... Power to the CAF.
yes i agree you do need to look at the way the entire place is being regulated, just seems quicker than weeding out individual posters who could then claim 'it is't fair i've been demoted.'
feck, I thought we had got rid of Thatcher!
You have a very high opinion of yourself and your opinion Davo. Especially for someone who uses the word 'Spastic' to describe people with whom you disagree.
However this is a stirling idea because when you have set up your elitist wank fest (for one) maybe you could just feck off and leave us alone.
Forums are supposed to be for all, so that you get some diverse opinion, however misguided, on any given topic.
And before you say it, I wouldn't want to be in your right wing think tank..... Power to the CAF.
There should be another forum set up for football discussion, made up of senior posters only. This could obviously grow as newer posters prove themselves not to be utter spastics
There seems to be an influx of posters on the football forum thesedays who have no knowledge of the game whatsoever...it's embarrassing to read
I'm happy to provide a list of non-spastics if required
This much is very true. It's a power trip, but one that's lead to a decent debate.
I just want to be able to discuss football occasionally without having to sift through bellends like you, Afro, Ekeke, FrancoBaresi and numerous others...
You're obviously not going to agree
It has lead to a good debate, but I find it remarkable that it is Davo that has started it all off. As I see it he is as responsible as any that he has called out as "spastics", to use his word, and as such needs to stand accountable also.
The place does need a shake up, tighter controls are needed in certain forums (not all) and maybe more moderators are needed to share the work load. The set up as it is, is not the problem, the foundations are there, all that is needed is clear boundaries and hard handed moderation to begin with to let everyone know where they stand.
feck, I thought we had got rid of Thatcher!
You have a very high opinion of yourself and your opinion Davo. Especially for someone who uses the word 'Spastic' to describe people with whom you disagree.
However this is a stirling idea because when you have set up your elitist wank fest (for one) maybe you could just feck off and leave us alone.
Forums are supposed to be for all, so that you get some diverse opinion, however misguided, on any given topic.
And before you say it, I wouldn't want to be in your right wing think tank..... Power to the CAF.
When people register they should be made to specify their age and anybody under 16 is ineligible for promotion.
we're too soft on newbies i think
If they haven't been promoted after 200 posts they should be banned because they're obviously wasting their time.
The footie forums do need cleaned up...and this season is the season for it. It needs the good regular posters to continue posting, dont let the Ihni binni dimi diniwiny anitaime destroy the threads, report the Ihni binni dimi diniwiny anitaime who take the threads off track, and we'll be along to delete posts/threads/posters.
However, and i want to make this absolutely clear, im not going to ban people simply because they support a different team. The forum would not survive if it was United only posters. It would turn into Red Issue. So, if you are a poster who prefers that environment, feel free to post there instead.
Christ, how did I know you'd find a way to work my name into this?
Am I really that bad a poster? ... I'm sure I'll cope
As for the idea, it's a crap one that would only lead to arguments, resentment even. The people who get to decide who joins won't always see eye to eye either, people get on with different types of people and that will definitely play a big part in the selection process.
You could all just put the people that really irritate you on ignore (as I mentioned to Davo earlier), and rely on the mods to weed out the rest.
It's just my opinion of you based on anything I can remember you posting. You seem clueless
Naturally you'll disagree...perhaps you can prove me wrong
PS. (bs.?) Sultan, with demotions and bannings there are going to be a lot of feelings hurt as well. Sometimes needs must, really. The nice guy thing has not been working for the last year or so. I fear for the place if we start to lag behind in the race. Thank you for trying, honestly. It is appreciated.
You know, i'm still baffled as to how you have formed this opinion of me.
Care to elaborate?
I most likely lead the banning race...
Does this mean we can have more witch hunts?
I'm interested aswell because I think you're a class poster KingEric. It seems like Davo thinks that people that don't agree with him are spastics.
A banning race between you and Blunder is the kind of thing you would only see on one of those parallel world sci fi shows.
The allies still won WWII, right?
Yes honey. How're you keeping?
BS. I'd like to make it clear that anyone trying to ban Spammy will have to do it over my bent-kneed body.
I did, but it's not happening!
I'm interested aswell because I think you're a class poster KingEric. It seems like Davo thinks that people that don't agree with him are spastics.
It did happen and the level of discussion had improved before the usual close season idiocy set in. We have been merging threads and trying to keep things on topic as well as being stricter on out and out abuse in the football forums (to mass complaining I might add).
Now that the season has started we will be policing the football forums more.
I think an elite forum is a disaster waiting to happen TBH. It will just make the football discussion even worse on the main forum and drive more decent posters away. We do have a problem with the level of cluelessness and stupidity that occurs in the football forum but I don't think this is the way to deal with it.
Absolutely spot on in every way.
Will the culling actually happen instead of just getting talked about like the last year, though?
We have been banning utter muppets but the sheer tide of them has been overwhelming.
And will opposition supporters who are useless WUMs see the door as quickly as useless MUFC supporters?
They already do. We ban the obvious loons and WUM's far more easily than we do United fans and there are actually very few of them who post regualrly. I see little issue with them really in that reducing their numbers will reduce actually football discussion even if they are irritating. I'm not going to say who but we have permanently canned 2 of the worst long term WUM's this week
The answers to both of these questions will tell whether this will work or not.
If this was really honestly done properly and aggressively, then there would be no need for the new subforum Davo is talking about.
But as Weaste says there has been no will whatsoever to clean the place up, and instead it seems to be a 'free trade in muppets' zone, with newbies getting through for basically being able to spell "United" properly at least half of the time. I think I made my feelings known before when we were trying to decide on standards under the points system.
The newbie was always meant as a way to filter out returnees, WUM's and invasions. Aclimatisation to the site was a stated aim but TBH I think it did nothing to prepare people for the main forum. It is actually working very well as is IMO.
I'm all for this working out, and I wish the mods the very best of luck. I just would like to see it in action asap.
PS. (bs.?) Sultan, with demotions and bannings there are going to be a lot of feelings hurt as well. Sometimes needs must, really. The nice guy thing has not been working for the last year or so. I fear for the place if we start to lag behind in the race. Thank you for trying, honestly. It is appreciated.
A lot of the problem in there is that one group of supporters or the other (yes, I said "or the other") will make a good point, or start a thread about something reasonable, and the other set will then say "well what about 'x'?", or just start spamming with "Champions" or "18-5" or "never won the league at Highbury" or some nonsense.
Although banter is a big part of the point, we all (me included) need to do a better job in guiding threads back onto the topic when possible.
In the MUFC forum it is just a case of the retards drowning out the intelligent posters.
Thank you, btw.
In regards to non-United fans getting banned, we have to be slightly more 'thorough'. What i mean is some United fans are quick to shout the word "WUM" if they simply don't agree with someones opinion on a match or a player. It's not very helpful because we have to decide who is genuinely shit stirring and who is worth keeping around.