Ban
New Member
Someone should write 'Spurs' in General forum just to see if he will emerge.
I don't understand it either. No other football forum would tolerate an obnoxious troll like him.Why isn't he banned? Derails every thread ffs
No.it's just that we don't have to sort one to deal with another.
What makes you include the goalkeeper in the formation? Have you ever seen it before? Does it feel necessary?yeah, 1-4-3-3 against bigger sides, 1-4-2-3-1 against lesser teams
I laugh every time I come into a thread and see people "talking" to themselves and arguing with what I assume is GS. Glad I blocked him. Really would like to know what he offers on this forum other than 1st class WUMming.Jesus Christ people, just ignore him.
Stop talking out of your arse. You made a negative (outrageously pedantic) observation about Matic and his age. Four or five posters responded giving you the time of day (feck knows why) and you have ignored them all, aside from one. These replies were all quite fair, too. Obviously you countered the one you found easiest to counter.
@Kostur responds to @Rado_N referencing Spurs, then you immediately jump on that and pedal some kind of narrative whereby United posters are attacking you and your beloved Spurs.
You see what you want to see and hang around these threads stinking them out. The day you're banned for good will be a great day for debate on here. You're a colossal waste of space and energy.
It was a United fan that brought Spurs into the discussion. This is usually the case: I make an observation - in this case about Matic's age (nothing to do with Spurs) - and then receive one or more replies referencing Spurs.
Several United fans have expressed concern about Matic's age. Are they too being 'outrageously pedantic'? In my view it's a reasonable point for discussion.
You accuse me of ignoring posts, then accuse me of stinking up the thread. Doubtless if I reply to every single post - as you apparently want - you'd then say I was stinking up the thread even more. It seems to be a case of heads you win, tails I lose
The issue is that he's 29.Isn't 28 pretty much "peak" for a central midfielder? Not sure what the issue is here.
Maybe, or maybe there won't. But either way you'll have another round of player-integration-into-the-squad to go through.
Unless someone quotes you in some way, be it your name or posts, how could you possibly know we're discussing Spurs? ...
28 according to my sources - unless he's going down the route of my nan and telling people he's "29 next birthday".The issue is that he's 29.
Several United fans have expressed concern about Matic's age. Are they too being 'outrageously pedantic'? In my view it's a reasonable point for discussion.
You accuse me of ignoring posts, then accuse me of stinking up the thread. Doubtless if I reply to every single post - as you apparently want - you'd then say I was stinking up the thread even more. It seems to be a case of heads you win, tails I lose
Well, I lied, a little harmless lie. He'll turn 29 tomorrow. Technically, he's still 28.28 according to my sources - unless he's going down the route of my nan and telling people he's "29 next birthday".
Obviously if he is actually 29 then that would change everything - why would we buy a has-been??
Yes they are.
Let's hope we get this thing wrapped up today then!Well, I lied, a little harmless lie. He'll turn 29 tomorrow. Technically, he's still 28.
28 according to my sources - unless he's going down the route of my nan and telling people he's "29 next birthday".
Obviously if he is actually 29 then that would change everything - why would we buy a has-been??
It's his birthday tomorrow. Don't think one day sends you spiraling over the hill or we are all in trouble.28 according to my sources - unless he's going down the route of my nan and telling people he's "29 next birthday".
Obviously if he is actually 29 then that would change everything - why would we buy a has-been??
Lloris, Vertongen, Alderweireld and Dembele are all around the same age as Matic. Must be very very concerning to have to be in the market for 4 vital players in just 2 years time.
Yeah, I agree, we should always be doing that though29 tomorrow - I don't think it's a problem but I do believe we should already be scouring Europe for his replacement (which is a little disconcerting seeing as he hasn't even signed yet!). 2/3 good years before we should start slowly introducing a younger replacement
Do you consider Pogba, Bailly, Lindeløf short term?Declaring 29 to be "peak" age is debateable. But the more important point is that it's not building for the long-term, since you'll be likely be back again looking for a replacement DM in a couple of years.
If you say Spurs 3 times in the mirror Glaston will appear to lecture you on economics.Someone should write 'Spurs' in General forum just to see if he will emerge.
on their past record yes.. but this was meant as a joke! especially as I don't see a world-class winger out there who is availableYou think the club works on transfers one by one?
Or Shaw, Martial, etc. Schneiderlin and Herrera were both about 23/24 when we bought them too, same with Darmian actually. Depay was only 21 or so, our strategy so far has been very geared towards players who can offer us years of service.Do you consider Pogba, Bailly, Lindeløf short term?
The post in question argued that 28/29 was a prime age for a footballer. It didn't really merit such a pedantic response. It's about right. The age discussion is a reasonable one, but there are good arguments to the contrary that you went out of your way to conveniently ignore.
Which is your problem. You have no interest in debate. All you're interested in doing is picking up on posts you don't like, using them to wind people up, and searching for anything Spurs-related to pursue your silly victim-playing agenda. It's relentless, really. Your entire approach to this forum is pathetic and a complete waste of your own time.
That's the last I will say on this, as I can't be arsed to waste any more of my time on you.
Declaring 29 to be "peak" age is debateable. But the more important point is that it's not building for the long-term, since you'll be likely be back again looking for a replacement DM in a couple of years.
Not until tomorrow.The issue is that he's 29.
Funny that that will feel exactly like someone inserting a hook up your anus, rummaging around, then pulling it out suddenly.If you say Spurs 3 times in the mirror Glaston will appear to lecture you on economics.
Nah, you're fishing mate. You know very well what button to push to turn a discussion onto Spurs. Talk down Utd and highlight how great your club is. It's what you do.It was a United fan that brought Spurs into the discussion. This is usually the case: I make an observation - in this case about Matic's age (nothing to do with Spurs) - and then receive one or more replies referencing Spurs.
Two years is a long time in football. Two years ago, we signed Schneiderlin who people thought could be our DM for the next 5-7 years, PL proven and moving at the right age. Look how that turned out.
United is at a stage where we simply can't afford to be stagnant for 2-3 more seasons. We need success and we need it now. Matic knows Mourinho's tactics, has won the PL twice, plays in a position where we're desperately short, and is the closest thing to Carrick in the PL today. He'll come in to the team and perform at a consistent, high level from Day 1. It's the equivalent of the Van Persie signing in CM.
It's as close to a perfect signing as you can go, and I'm really excited. Our window so far has been absolutely spot on.
Declaring 29 to be "peak" age is debateable. But the more important point is that it's not building for the long-term, since you'll be likely be back again looking for a replacement DM in a couple of years.
On the contrary, I came to the view that Spurs would not sell Dier and I'm happy that's proved to be the case. It's pretty clear that United tried for Dier, and then went for Matic as 2nd choice.