- Joined
- Dec 31, 2007
- Messages
- 91,045
I've never rated Dembele. Didn't watch him last night but he's never looked all that at Fulham. Can beat a man with ease but so wasteful.
I never get the dislike for Fellaini. The lad is a pretty good player.
Agreed; he absolutely dominated yesterday.
I never get the dislike for Fellaini. The lad is a pretty good player.
I've never rated Dembele. Didn't watch him last night but he's never looked all that at Fulham. Can beat a man with ease but so wasteful.
Wasteful? I'd say the opposite. I don't think he wastes enough. Perhaps a little too safe with his passing, and doesn't shoot enough.
I never get the dislike for Fellaini. The lad is a pretty good player.
It's funny how Dembele is being judged on his first season to ever play as a midfielder.
All the talk of him moving is laughable. He still has loads to prove in the role.
Totally different to Carrick on the ball. He's a ball carrier, and dynamic. Can also pass it. Similar to Anderson actually who everything thought complemented Carrick pretty well season before this one mainly.
Same as Carrick as in he plays the safe side ways ball a lot. I think we could do with a player that offers something else to compliment Carrick, Anderson is much more forceful and explosive than Dembele looked in the game last night.
Same as Carrick as in he plays the safe side ways ball a lot. I think we could do with a player that offers something else to compliment Carrick, Anderson is much more forceful and explosive than Dembele looked in the game last night.
It's funny how Dembele is being judged on his first season to ever play as a midfielder.
All the talk of him moving is laughable. He still has loads to prove in the role.
I see your point, on the other hand there is obviously advantages in buying a player that is unproven - for instance price. He can obviously improve on certain areas as position and "defensive awareness". On the other hand, beeing one of the best midfielders in the PL in his first season as a midfielder is impressive and a sign of great promise. His abilities on the ball, and physical presence, is without doubt rare, and qualities we miss.
If we wait, and let him improve his weaknesses in another club, hemight be a difficult player to get (and certainly expensive).
That beeing said, I like Witsel better. Remind me abit of a mixture of Gerrard and Hargreaves. Both should be on Fergusons mind, in my opinion.
I never get the dislike for Fellaini. The lad is a pretty good player.
Some comments in this forum speak of Dembele as though he is the second coming. I don't know if United are genuine interested in him - if so, it just underlines the sheer fatuousness of Gill's attempt to assure fans that United are able to compete for top transfers. Time and again, it would appear United's interest falters when it comes to the concept of "value".
Do we really expect a marque signing this summer, a player of proven world/international class? (btw, I think Hazard is unproven, even on the European stage). Do we really need a player like Dembele?
Something we agree on.
Strangely not rated much for some reason.
Why on gods green earth would we want Dembele?
My issue is some people expect him to be the finished article of some sort that is why the criticism is so harsh. Which is laughable! It's his first season in the role. He has shown he has the attributes to possibly become a star in the role. But is yet to show the consistent efficiency required over more than season to be judged fairly.To be fair I don't think that's a reasonable stance, I judged him on his first game playing central midfield. He simply looks quality in that position, all the criticisms of wastefulness can't be levelled at him there, as its not as big an issue. He's literally a bit of everything that one would want in an archetypal modern central midfielder.
Are we going to try do the opposite of Spain by playing no midfielders and 6 strikers/wingers or something?
He won't play as striker for the club he signs for more a CM.
He plays behind the striker, why exactly would that change?
From what I've seen of him there's not a lot of threat in terms of goalscoring, but he keeps the ball extremely well and uses it intelligently. I reckon we could do worse, though I'm not sure he'd be the sort of player who dominates our midfield.
From what I've seen of him there's not a lot of threat in terms of goalscoring, but he keeps the ball extremely well and uses it intelligently. I reckon we could do worse, though I'm not sure he'd be the sort of player who dominates our midfield.
I'd have Dembele at Utd definitley. We are linked with every man and his dog though at the moment. Non of it seems concrete.