Adebesi
Full Member
PL two years in a row. In the third year he was in contention until very late, and won the FA Cup. Which is hardly a club in meltdown, is it.
However he very rarely brings through youth,
The trouble with Guardiola is that he hasn't really proven himself outside Barca where he had the once in a lifetime benefit of the Messi-Xavi-Iniesta triumvirate. Having three of the world's top five players available would tend to make most managers successful, and yet Mourinho still managed to walk off with a Copa del Rey and La Liga trophy in their time together (although Pep did much better in league Classicos). I see Barca's return to the top this year as a sign that it was the players including probably having the greatest footballer ever in his prime in his squad, that made Pep as successful as he was.
He never left Chelsea, he was removed.I agree with part of what Twigg is saying. It's a valid point to make that he's never stuck around to build more than one great team everywhere he's managed. He's usually off once the team's reached its peak.
Having said that, I'd still love to see him come here, win us trophies and leave after 3-4 years.
If anyone has the temperament to deal with taking over from Sir Alex, and being the first ever Man Utd manager from outside the British Isles it's Jose Mourinho
I have the same concerns as everyone else; he's a bit of a dick, doesn't stay very long at a club, I'm not convinced he knows the transfer market very well and doesn't bring young players through..
can't argue with his results though, and maybe if he's expected to bring young players through and is given latitude for it, he will do.
Mourinho would be a brilliant replacement for Fergie. I think he'd get Old Trafford rocking again with his antics and his words.
However, I'm not convinced he will actually be our next manager. Fergies words seem to have been taken a bit out of context, plus Mourinho recently said he thinks he'll return to the premiership whilst Fergie is still in charger here. I took that as him saying he'd be interested in the City or Chelsea jobs.
If anyone has the temperament to deal with taking over from Sir Alex, and being the first ever Man Utd manager from outside the British Isles it's Jose Mourinho
I have the same concerns as everyone else; he's a bit of a dick, doesn't stay very long at a club, I'm not convinced he knows the transfer market very well and doesn't bring young players through..
can't argue with his results though, and maybe if he's expected to bring young players through and is given latitude for it, he will do.
I know what you mean. He's made for the United job. The club can give him everything he wants and the supporters will love him. I've heard a few people mention it, but during our rivalry with Chelsea the 'Mourinho, are you listening...' chants were brilliant, but you still could sense the massive amount of respect for the guy. You just knew that you'd want him on our side, turn those into positive songs/chants and it'd be buzzing. He'd be I his element.
How much of a bearing will Bobby Charltons words have on it though? Didn't he once say that he dint like the guy?
Have to take the clubs he's been at into consideration and the job he was hired to do as well. I don't know much about his time at Porto in all honesty, so I'll just skip that. However:
Chelsea: Hired by a mad Russian who desperately wants to win trophies at all cost. There's no room (or reason) to experiment with young players when you've got an unlimited money tank and incredibly high expectations. Particularly not when you know that your boss won't think twice about firing your ass if you don't deliver.
Inter: If I'm not mistaken Mourinho was hired to deliver trophies right away. The squad was already ageing, so unless Mourinho wanted to rebuild pretty much the whole team there was no time to experiment. That being said, he did use Balotelli and if he hadn't been wearing Milan shirts around town he would probably have been used more.
Real Madrid: Bit like Chelsea, minus the Russian. Under insane pressure to deliver results on the pitch and the club doesn't have a particularly great history of bringing through young players even before Mourinho got there. Can hardly blame Mourinho for not bringing through enough young players in his time there really.
Let it be clear that I'm not really a massive fan of Mourinho. His results speak for themselves, but beyond that I'm not so sure what I think of him. It's clear from the clubs he's been at (after Porto) that they all hired him to win trophies - he wasn't hired to rebuild a squad or to start some new era. He was hired to be successful on the pitch right away which leaves little room (or reason) for trying to bring through young players. Would he do differently at United? I suspect he will, if that's what he's asked to. It's impossible to say though.
Why would you expect that the situation would be different with United? He won't be expected to win trophies right away? Will the fans wait for 5 trophy-less years before he can bring success? I don't think so.
Luckily, our board does not listen to our fans on the terraces or on RedCafe
Else they would have sacked SAF 5 years into his job with us, as fans were openly demanding!
If any new managers trophy haul was not immediate, they will know we do not in terms of philosophy or policy adopt a Chelsea/Madrid type approach to appointing senior staff members, especially the most important position in the club, which is manager. Its just not the way we do things.
Why would you expect that the situation would be different with United? He won't be expected to win trophies right away? Will the fans wait for 5 trophy-less years before he can bring success? I don't think so.
I think that if he take the job as United manager he'd see it as a long-term project. Probably the first in his career. I think that would be the difference between how he'd tackle the challenge compared to how he's tackled challenges up till now. Of course we'd expect trophies right away from him as well, but unlike Chelsea and Real Madrid we don't expect to win the league every year (well, I suppose some fans do..) and we don't expect a CL trophy right away either. United would also offer some patience, which Madrid and Chelsea are hardly known for. Basically, it'd be a completely different challenge and therefore I believe Mourinho would handle it differently.
Big question is of course if he's capable of actually building teams like Sir Alex has done so many times, but that's impossible to say really. Also begs the question; who else would be a better shot in the current market? Pep who hasn't proved anything at all outside Barca? As I said, I'm not a massive Mourinho fan but to me he does seem like the best option right now, should Fergie retire soon.
Here are my concerns:
1. I want a manager who will stay a long time. Okay, maybe not as long as SAF but no fly-by-night. Would Jose and/or his wife want to remain in gray, cold, rainy Manchester for years and years?
2. SAF has always struck me as an exceptionally shrewed human being in general. Does Jose compare in this regard?
3. SAF also has exceptional man management skills, and this is not limited to father-figure handling of certain players like Ronaldo and Rooney. Do Jose's man-mangement skills compare to Fergie's?
4. SAF's mind games top the league. (That's a facht). How do Jose's compare with Sir Alex's ability to institute and control mind games.
Did anyone watch the documentary on Mourinho tonight on itv4?
What a really interesting character. I have warmed to him.
Fergie commented alot throughout and he seems to really like him too. Very complimentary. I do think he would be good at United.
In far of the managing aspect of the game Mourinho is the closest thing to SAF you'll get. For example, when SAF is in the transfer market he usually takes a good look at a player and makes sure he's suited mentally for the team. Jose is like that as well. You probably remember the Chelsea team and how it was. The current Real team play excellent attacking football at times and every single player is hard working and dedicated. If not, you're not going to play. Benzema is a prime example.
Number 1 is the one of two concerns people generally have with him. England isn't the problem, nor the weather. He likes England, he owns a house here and he's said he wants to return.
The other thing is his character. And I mean character. Some people have a problem with it. The way he speaks and behaves. I agree that it gets out of hand at times. But the man is usually right with most things he says and does. Some find that annoying because the last thing you want from a person whom you don't like is that person being right and/or successful.
I don't know what to expect when SAF finally does retire. It will be surreal. I'm just gonna sit back, give the successor time, be patient and hope he does well.
Did anyone watch the documentary on Mourinho tonight on itv4?
What a really interesting character. I have warmed to him.
Fergie commented alot throughout and he seems to really like him too. Very complimentary. I do think he would be good at United.
Yeah. Fergie most certainly has a lot of time for him. I can understand why people don't like him, but I find his honesty likeable.
Yeah, enjoyed that. I'd love Jose at Utd. The worry is how long would he stick around if he wants to manage his country. Unless he leaves Madrid in the summer, goes for the next World Cup with Portugal and then takes over Utd when Fergie retires in time for the 2014/15 season.
Yeah I watched it and really enjoyed it. Fergie spoke very highly of him, it's obvious they have a great mutual respect for each other. Despite warming to him a bit more I still can't see him at United though. Brilliant manager but just don't think he fits the United mould.
All a matter of opinion though.
Do not want Mourinho at our club. He's a nomad: never stays longer at one club. Do we really need such a manager? No doubt is he a special one, but his pre-match antics against Atletico Madrid reminds me what kind of person he is: when facing problems he threatens to quit.
Do not want Mourinho at our club. He's a nomad: never stays longer at one club. Do we really need such a manager? No doubt is he a special one, but his pre-match antics against Atletico Madrid reminds me what kind of person he is: when facing problems he threatens to quit.
Any manager who comes in after Ferguson will only be here for about five seasons anyway, in my opinion. Managers don't stick at one club at the very highest anymore. Ferguson, Wenger etc. are the last of a dying breed.
Disagree here.
Yes he has been to a few clubs but how can you pre-empt what he will do in the future. If he finds somewhere he feels settled, which may well be England considering he is adamant he is going back, then why won't he stay and become a legend somewhere?
He is still young and has been enjoying himself. He will want to settle at somepoint I am sure.
Eh? That's just mental.
If you think of Ferguson then some of the first things that come to mind are being a one club man, playing attacking football, promoting youth players, signing young talent in the transfer market. Mourinho doesn't do any of these.
You've highlighted their transfer dealings as being similar, but they really aren't. Mourinho doesn't have Ferguson's tendency to purchase a prospect, he is much more about buying established stars. Robben was the standout buy from that era but he was bought before Jose was hired, who then bought Drogba, Carvalho, Ferreira, Kezman etc. Next year he spent £60million on Essien and Wright-Phillips, whereas Fergie spent £16million on Vidic and Evra. He doesn't have the same record of buying prospects IMO, players like Hernandez.
Same at Inter Milan where he didn't buy young players, which has left them completely fecked now with a really old team. Sneijder, Lucio, Pandev, Milito, Thiago Motta, Eto'o were all 25+. Some of them are good signings, but they are all established players which isn't the case with Ferguson.